§2.3 Integrals of a Real Variable
Contents
- §2.3(i) Integration by Parts
- §2.3(ii) Watson’s Lemma
- §2.3(iii) Laplace’s Method
- §2.3(iv) Method of Stationary Phase
- §2.3(v) Coalescing Peak and Endpoint: Bleistein’s Method
§2.3(i) Integration by Parts
Assume that the Laplace transform
converges for all sufficiently large
, and
is infinitely
differentiable in a neighborhood of the origin. Then

If, in addition,
is infinitely differentiable on
and
is finite and bounded for
, then the
th error term
(that is, the difference between the integral and
th partial sum in
(2.3.2)) is bounded in absolute value by
when
exceeds both 0 and
.
For the Fourier integral
assume
and
are finite, and
is infinitely differentiable on
. Then

Alternatively, assume
,
is infinitely differentiable on
, and each of the integrals
,
, converges as
uniformly for all sufficiently
large
. Then

In both cases the
th error term is bounded in absolute value by
, where the variational
operator
is defined by
see §1.4(v). For other examples, see Wong (1989, Chapter 1).
§2.3(ii) Watson’s Lemma
Assume again that the integral (2.3.1) converges for all
sufficiently large
, but now

where
and
are positive constants. Then the series obtained by
substituting (2.3.7) into (2.3.1) and integrating
formally term by term yields an asymptotic expansion:

For the function
see §5.2(i).
This result is probably the most frequently used method for deriving asymptotic
expansions of special functions. Since
need not be continuous (as long
as the integral converges), the case of a finite integration range is included.
Other types of singular behavior in the integrand can be treated in an analogous manner. For example,
provided that the integral on the left-hand side of (2.3.9)
converges for all sufficiently large values of
. (In other words,
differentiation of (2.3.8) with respect to the parameter
(or
) is legitimate.)
§2.3(iii) Laplace’s Method
When
is real and
is a large positive parameter, the main
contribution to the integral
derives from the neighborhood of the minimum of
in the integration
range. Without loss of generality, we assume that this minimum is at the left
endpoint
. Furthermore:
-
(a)
and
are continuous in a neighborhood of
, save
possibly at
, and the minimum of
in
is approached only at
. -
(b)
As
2.3.14

and the expansion for
is differentiable. Again
and
are
positive constants. Also
(consistent with (a)). -
(c)
The integral (2.3.13) converges absolutely for all sufficiently large
.
Then

where the coefficients
are defined by the expansion

in which
. For example,


In general
Watson’s lemma can be regarded as a special case of this result.
§2.3(iv) Method of Stationary Phase
When the parameter
is large the contributions from the real and imaginary
parts of the integrand in
oscillate rapidly and cancel themselves over most of the range. However,
cancellation does not take place near the endpoints, owing to lack of symmetry,
nor in the neighborhoods of zeros of
because
changes relatively
slowly at these stationary points.
The first result is the analog of Watson’s lemma (§2.3(ii)).
Assume that
again has the expansion (2.3.7) and this
expansion is infinitely differentiable,
is infinitely differentiable on
, and each of the integrals
,
, converges at
, uniformly for all sufficiently
large
. Then

where the coefficients
are given by (2.3.7).
For the more general integral (2.3.19) we assume, without loss of generality, that the stationary point (if any) is at the left endpoint. Furthermore:
-
(a)
On
,
and
are infinitely differentiable and
. -
(b)
As
the asymptotic expansions (2.3.14) apply,
and each is infinitely differentiable. Again
,
, and
are
positive. -
(c)
If the limit
of
as
is finite, then each of
the functions2.3.21
,
tends to a finite limit
. -
(d)
If
, then
and each of the integrals2.3.22
,
converges at
uniformly for all sufficiently large
.
If
is finite, then both endpoints contribute:

But if (d) applies, then the second sum is absent. The coefficients
are
defined as in §2.3(iii).
§2.3(v) Coalescing Peak and Endpoint: Bleistein’s Method
In the integral
(
) and
are positive constants,
is a
variable parameter in an interval
with
and
, and
is a large positive
parameter. Assume also that
and
are
continuous in
and
, and for each
the minimum value of
in
is at
, at which point
vanishes, but both
and
are nonzero. When
Laplace’s method
(§2.3(iii)) applies, but the form of the resulting approximation is
discontinuous at
. In consequence, the approximation is nonuniform
with respect to
and deteriorates severely as
.
A uniform approximation can be constructed by quadratic change of integration variable:
where
and
are functions of
chosen in such a way that
corresponds to
, and the stationary points
and
correspond. Thus
the upper or lower sign being taken according as
. The
relationship between
and
is one-to-one, and because
it is free from singularity at
.
The integral (2.3.24) transforms into
where
being the value of
at
. We now expand
in a Taylor series centered at the peak value
of the
exponential factor in the integrand:
with the coefficients
continuous at
. The
desired uniform expansion is then obtained formally as in Watson’s lemma and
Laplace’s method. We replace the limit
by
and integrate
term-by-term:

where


