About the Project

Buy lapointe 100 - www.icmat. - Priligy lapointe 30 60mg. remarke cautionation tables Online - www.icmat.

AdvancedHelp

Did you mean Buy lapointe 100 - www.icmat.. - Priligy lapointe 30 60mg. remarke cautionation tables Online - www.icmat.. ?

(0.005 seconds)

1—10 of 218 matching pages

1: 35.12 Software
For an algorithm to evaluate zonal polynomials, and an implementation of the algorithm in Maple by Zeilberger, see Lapointe and Vinet (1996).
2: 25.10 Zeros
More than 41% of all the zeros in the critical strip lie on the critical line (Bui et al. (2011)). …
3: Bibliography B
  • K. Bay, W. Lay, and A. Akopyan (1997) Avoided crossings of the quartic oscillator. J. Phys. A 30 (9), pp. 3057–3067.
  • T. A. Beu and R. I. Câmpeanu (1983a) Prolate angular spheroidal wave functions. Comput. Phys. Comm. 30 (2), pp. 187–192.
  • T. A. Beu and R. I. Câmpeanu (1983b) Prolate radial spheroidal wave functions. Comput. Phys. Comm. 30 (2), pp. 177–185.
  • J. M. Blair, C. A. Edwards, and J. H. Johnson (1976) Rational Chebyshev approximations for the inverse of the error function. Math. Comp. 30 (136), pp. 827–830.
  • H. M. Bui, B. Conrey, and M. P. Young (2011) More than 41% of the zeros of the zeta function are on the critical line. Acta Arith. 150 (1), pp. 35–64.
  • 4: Bibliography Z
  • M. R. Zaghloul (2016) Remark on “Algorithm 916: computing the Faddeyeva and Voigt functions”: efficiency improvements and Fortran translation. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 42 (3), pp. 26:1–26:9.
  • Zeilberger (website) Doron Zeilberger’s Maple Packages and Programs Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Jersey.
  • M. I. Žurina and L. N. Karmazina (1964) Tables of the Legendre functions P 1 / 2 + i τ ( x ) . Part I. Translated by D. E. Brown. Mathematical Tables Series, Vol. 22, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • M. I. Žurina and L. N. Karmazina (1965) Tables of the Legendre functions P 1 / 2 + i τ ( x ) . Part II. Translated by Prasenjit Basu. Mathematical Tables Series, Vol. 38. A Pergamon Press Book, The Macmillan Co., New York.
  • M. I. Žurina and L. N. Osipova (1964) Tablitsy vyrozhdennoi gipergeometricheskoi funktsii. Vyčisl. Centr Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (Russian).
  • 5: Bibliography L
  • L. Lapointe and L. Vinet (1996) Exact operator solution of the Calogero-Sutherland model. Comm. Math. Phys. 178 (2), pp. 425–452.
  • D. K. Lee (1990) Application of theta functions for numerical evaluation of complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds. Comput. Phys. Comm. 60 (3), pp. 319–327.
  • D. A. Levine (1969) Algorithm 344: Student’s t-distribution [S14]. Comm. ACM 12 (1), pp. 37–38.
  • J. S. Lew (1994) On the Darling-Mandelbrot probability density and the zeros of some incomplete gamma functions. Constr. Approx. 10 (1), pp. 15–30.
  • Y. L. Luke (1971b) Miniaturized tables of Bessel functions. Math. Comp. 25 (114), pp. 323–330.
  • 6: Errata
  • Chapter 1 Additions

    The following additions were made in Chapter 1:

  • Version 1.1.6 (June 30, 2022)
  • Subsection 25.10(ii)

    In the paragraph immediately below (25.10.4), it was originally stated that “more than one-third of all zeros in the critical strip lie on the critical line.” which referred to Levinson (1974). This sentence has been updated with “one-third” being replaced with “41%” now referring to Bui et al. (2011) (suggested by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23).

  • Table 18.3.1

    There has been disagreement about the identification of the Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds, denoted V n ( x ) and W n ( x ) , in published references. Originally, DLMF used the definitions given in (Andrews et al., 1999, Remark 2.5.3). However, those definitions were the reverse of those used by Mason and Handscomb (2003), Gautschi (2004) following Mason (1993) and Gautschi (1992), as was noted in several warnings added in Version 1.0.10 (August 7, 2015) of the DLMF. Since the latter definitions are more widely established, the DLMF is now adopting the definitions of Mason and Handscomb (2003). Essentially, what we previously denoted V n ( x ) is now written as W n ( x ) , and vice-versa.

    This notational interchange necessitated changes in Tables 18.3.1, 18.5.1, and 18.6.1, and in Equations (18.5.3), (18.5.4), (18.7.5), (18.7.6), (18.7.17), (18.7.18), (18.9.11), and (18.9.12).

  • Table 18.3.1

    Special cases of normalization of Jacobi polynomials for which the general formula is undefined have been stated explicitly in Table 18.3.1.

  • 7: 30 Spheroidal Wave Functions
    Chapter 30 Spheroidal Wave Functions
    8: 14.33 Tables
    §14.33 Tables
  • Zhang and Jin (1996, Chapter 4) tabulates 𝖯 n ( x ) for n = 2 ( 1 ) 5 , 10 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , 7D; 𝖯 n ( cos θ ) for n = 1 ( 1 ) 4 , 10 , θ = 0 ( 5 ) 90 , 8D; 𝖰 n ( x ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 2 , 10 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 0.9 , 8S; 𝖰 n ( cos θ ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 3 , 10 , θ = 0 ( 5 ) 90 , 8D; 𝖯 n m ( x ) for m = 1 ( 1 ) 4 , n m = 0 ( 1 ) 2 , n = 10 , x = 0 , 0.5 , 8S; 𝖰 n m ( x ) for m = 1 ( 1 ) 4 , n = 0 ( 1 ) 2 , 10 , 8S; 𝖯 ν m ( cos θ ) for m = 0 ( 1 ) 3 , ν = 0 ( .25 ) 5 , θ = 0 ( 15 ) 90 , 5D; P n ( x ) for n = 2 ( 1 ) 5 , 10 , x = 1 ( 1 ) 10 , 7S; Q n ( x ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 2 , 10 , x = 2 ( 1 ) 10 , 8S. Corresponding values of the derivative of each function are also included, as are 6D values of the first 5 ν -zeros of 𝖯 ν m ( cos θ ) and of its derivative for m = 0 ( 1 ) 4 , θ = 10 , 30 , 150 .

  • Žurina and Karmazina (1964, 1965) tabulate the conical functions 𝖯 1 2 + i τ ( x ) for τ = 0 ( .01 ) 50 , x = 0.9 ( .1 ) 0.9 , 7S; P 1 2 + i τ ( x ) for τ = 0 ( .01 ) 50 , x = 1.1 ( .1 ) 2 ( .2 ) 5 ( .5 ) 10 ( 10 ) 60 , 7D. Auxiliary tables are included to facilitate computation for larger values of τ when 1 < x < 1 .

  • Žurina and Karmazina (1963) tabulates the conical functions 𝖯 1 2 + i τ 1 ( x ) for τ = 0 ( .01 ) 25 , x = 0.9 ( .1 ) 0.9 , 7S; P 1 2 + i τ 1 ( x ) for τ = 0 ( .01 ) 25 , x = 1.1 ( .1 ) 2 ( .2 ) 5 ( .5 ) 10 ( 10 ) 60 , 7S. Auxiliary tables are included to assist computation for larger values of τ when 1 < x < 1 .

  • For tables prior to 1961 see Fletcher et al. (1962) and Lebedev and Fedorova (1960).
    9: 24.2 Definitions and Generating Functions
    §24.2(iv) Tables
    Table 24.2.1: Bernoulli and Euler numbers.
    n B n E n
    Table 24.2.2: Bernoulli and Euler polynomials.
    n B n ( x ) E n ( x )
    10: 24.1 Special Notation
    The present notation, as defined in §24.2(i), was used in Lucas (1891) and Nörlund (1924), and has become the prevailing notation; see Table 24.2.1. …
    B 2 = 1 30 ,
    B 4 = 1 30 , .
    Other historical remarks on notations can be found in Cajori (1929, pp. 42–44). …