About the Project

.今年世界杯对阵__『welcom_』_巴西世界杯梅西金球奖_w6n2c9o_2022年11月30日8时7分_lvhhtouai.com

AdvancedHelp

(0.007 seconds)

21—30 of 783 matching pages

21: Bibliography B
  • R. Barakat (1961) Evaluation of the incomplete gamma function of imaginary argument by Chebyshev polynomials. Math. Comp. 15 (73), pp. 7–11.
  • B. C. Berndt, S. Bhargava, and F. G. Garvan (1995) Ramanujan’s theories of elliptic functions to alternative bases. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (11), pp. 4163–4244.
  • F. Bethuel (1998) Vortices in Ginzburg-Landau Equations. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. III (Berlin, 1998), pp. 11–19.
  • A. Bhattacharyya and L. Shafai (1988) Theoretical and experimental investigation of the elliptical annual ring antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation 36 (11), pp. 1526–1530.
  • R. L. Bishop (1981) Rainbow over Woolsthorpe Manor. Notes and Records Roy. Soc. London 36 (1), pp. 3–11 (1 plate).
  • 22: Bibliography F
  • B. R. Fabijonas (2004) Algorithm 838: Airy functions. ACM Trans. Math. Software 30 (4), pp. 491–501.
  • V. N. Faddeyeva and N. M. Terent’ev (1961) Tables of Values of the Function w ( z ) = e z 2 ( 1 + 2 i π 1 / 2 0 z e t 2 𝑑 t ) for Complex Argument. Edited by V. A. Fok; translated from the Russian by D. G. Fry. Mathematical Tables Series, Vol. 11, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • N. Fleury and A. Turbiner (1994) Polynomial relations in the Heisenberg algebra. J. Math. Phys. 35 (11), pp. 6144–6149.
  • A. S. Fokas and M. J. Ablowitz (1982) On a unified approach to transformations and elementary solutions of Painlevé equations. J. Math. Phys. 23 (11), pp. 2033–2042.
  • L. W. Fullerton (1972) Algorithm 435: Modified incomplete gamma function. Comm. ACM 15 (11), pp. 993–995.
  • 23: Bibliography K
  • G. A. Kalugin, D. J. Jeffrey, and R. M. Corless (2012) Bernstein, Pick, Poisson and related integral expressions for Lambert W . Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 23 (11), pp. 817–829.
  • E. L. Kaplan (1948) Auxiliary table for the incomplete elliptic integrals. J. Math. Physics 27, pp. 11–36.
  • R. P. Kerr (1963) Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11 (5), pp. 237–238.
  • Y. S. Kim, A. K. Rathie, and R. B. Paris (2013) An extension of Saalschütz’s summation theorem for the series F r + 2 r + 3 . Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 24 (11), pp. 916–921.
  • K. S. Kölbig (1968) Algorithm 327: Dilogarithm [S22]. Comm. ACM 11 (4), pp. 270–271.
  • 24: Bibliography
  • M. Abramowitz (1949) Asymptotic expansions of spheroidal wave functions. J. Math. Phys. Mass. Inst. Tech. 28, pp. 195–199.
  • S. Ahmed and M. E. Muldoon (1980) On the zeros of confluent hypergeometric functions. III. Characterization by means of nonlinear equations. Lett. Nuovo Cimento (2) 29 (11), pp. 353–358.
  • V. I. Arnol’d (1974) Normal forms of functions in the neighborhood of degenerate critical points. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 29 (2(176)), pp. 11–49 (Russian).
  • V. I. Arnol’d (1975) Critical points of smooth functions, and their normal forms. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 30 (5(185)), pp. 3–65 (Russian).
  • R. Askey (1980) Some basic hypergeometric extensions of integrals of Selberg and Andrews. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 11 (6), pp. 938–951.
  • 25: Bibliography Y
  • A. I. Yablonskiĭ (1959) On rational solutions of the second Painlevé equation. Vesti Akad. Navuk. BSSR Ser. Fiz. Tkh. Nauk. 3, pp. 30–35 (Russian).
  • H. A. Yamani and W. P. Reinhardt (1975) L -squared discretizations of the continuum: Radial kinetic energy and the Coulomb Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. A 11 (4), pp. 1144–1156.
  • 26: Bibliography E
  • C. Eckart (1930) The penetration of a potential barrier by electrons. Phys. Rev. 35 (11), pp. 1303–1309.
  • A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi (1953a) Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. I. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London.
  • A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi (1953b) Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. II. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York-Toronto-London.
  • L. Euler (1768) Institutiones Calculi Integralis. Opera Omnia (1), Vol. 11, pp. 110–113.
  • W. N. Everitt (2008) Note on the X 1 -Laguerre orthogonal polynomials.
  • 27: 9.18 Tables
  • Miller (1946) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) for x = 20 ( .01 ) 2 ; log 10 Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) / Ai ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 25 ( 1 ) 75 ; Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 10 ( .1 ) 2.5 ; log 10 Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) / Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ; M ( x ) , N ( x ) , θ ( x ) , ϕ ( x ) (respectively F ( x ) , G ( x ) , χ ( x ) , ψ ( x ) ) for x = 80 ( 1 ) 30 ( .1 ) 0 . Precision is generally 8D; slightly less for some of the auxiliary functions. Extracts from these tables are included in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10), together with some auxiliary functions for large arguments.

  • Harvard University (1945) tabulates the real and imaginary parts of h 1 ( z ) , h 1 ( z ) , h 2 ( z ) , h 2 ( z ) for x 0 z x 0 , 0 z y 0 , | x 0 + i y 0 | < 6.1 , with interval 0.1 in z and z . Precision is 8D. Here h 1 ( z ) = 2 4 / 3 3 1 / 6 i Ai ( e π i / 3 z ) , h 2 ( z ) = 2 4 / 3 3 1 / 6 i Ai ( e π i / 3 z ) .

  • Sherry (1959) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; 20S.

  • National Bureau of Standards (1958) tabulates A 0 ( x ) π Hi ( x ) and A 0 ( x ) π Hi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .01 ) 1 ( .02 ) 5 ( .05 ) 11 and 1 / x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 0.1 ; 0 x A 0 ( t ) d t for x = 0.5 , 1 ( 1 ) 11 . Precision is 8D.

  • Gil et al. (2003c) tabulates the only positive zero of Gi ( z ) , the first 10 negative real zeros of Gi ( z ) and Gi ( z ) , and the first 10 complex zeros of Gi ( z ) , Gi ( z ) , Hi ( z ) , and Hi ( z ) . Precision is 11 or 12S.

  • 28: 18.8 Differential Equations
    Table 18.8.1: Classical OP’s: differential equations A ( x ) f ′′ ( x ) + B ( x ) f ( x ) + C ( x ) f ( x ) + λ n f ( x ) = 0 .
    # f ( x ) A ( x ) B ( x ) C ( x ) λ n
    11 e n 1 x x + 1 L n 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 n 1 x ) 1 0 2 x ( + 1 ) x 2 1 n 2
    12 H n ( x ) 1 2 x 0 2 n
    14 𝐻𝑒 n ( x ) 1 x 0 n
    Item 11 of Table 18.8.1 yields (18.39.36) for Z = 1 .
    29: 10.75 Tables
  • Wills et al. (1982) tabulates j 0 , m , j 1 , m , y 0 , m , y 1 , m for m = 1 ( 1 ) 30 , 35D.

  • MacDonald (1989) tabulates the first 30 zeros, in ascending order of absolute value in the fourth quadrant, of the function J 0 ( z ) i J 1 ( z ) , 6D. (Other zeros of this function can be obtained by reflection in the imaginary axis).

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 11) tabulates 0 x J 0 ( t ) d t , 0 x Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 , 10D; 0 x t 1 ( 1 J 0 ( t ) ) d t , x t 1 Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 5 , 8D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 11) tabulates e x 0 x I 0 ( t ) d t , e x x K 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 , 7D; e x 0 x t 1 ( I 0 ( t ) 1 ) d t , x e x x t 1 K 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 5 , 6D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 296–305) tabulates 𝗃 n ( x ) , 𝗃 n ( x ) , 𝗒 n ( x ) , 𝗒 n ( x ) , 𝗂 n ( 1 ) ( x ) , 𝗂 n ( 1 ) ( x ) , 𝗄 n ( x ) , 𝗄 n ( x ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 10 ( 10 ) 30 , 50, 100, x = 1 , 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 8S; x 𝗃 n ( x ) , ( x 𝗃 n ( x ) ) , x 𝗒 n ( x ) , ( x 𝗒 n ( x ) ) (Riccati–Bessel functions and their derivatives), n = 0 ( 1 ) 10 ( 10 ) 30 , 50, 100, x = 1 , 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 8S; real and imaginary parts of 𝗃 n ( z ) , 𝗃 n ( z ) , 𝗒 n ( z ) , 𝗒 n ( z ) , 𝗂 n ( 1 ) ( z ) , 𝗂 n ( 1 ) ( z ) , 𝗄 n ( z ) , 𝗄 n ( z ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 15 , 20(10)50, 100, z = 4 + 2 i , 20 + 10 i , 8S. (For the notation replace j , y , i , k by 𝗃 , 𝗒 , 𝗂 ( 1 ) , 𝗄 , respectively.)

  • 30: 26.12 Plane Partitions
    26.12.10 ( h = 1 r j = 1 s h + j + t 1 h + j 1 ) ( h = 1 r + 1 j = 1 s h + j + t 1 h + j 1 ) ;
    26.12.11 ( h = 1 r + 1 j = 1 s h + j + t 1 h + j 1 ) ( h = 1 r j = 1 s + 1 h + j + t 1 h + j 1 ) .
    The notation π B ( r , s , t ) denotes the sum over all plane partitions contained in B ( r , s , t ) , and | π | denotes the number of elements in π . … where σ 2 ( j ) is the sum of the squares of the divisors of j . …
    26.12.26 pp ( n ) ( ζ ( 3 ) ) 7 / 36 2 11 / 36 ( 3 π ) 1 / 2 n 25 / 36 exp ( 3 ( ζ ( 3 ) ) 1 / 3 ( 1 2 n ) 2 / 3 + ζ ( 1 ) ) ,