About the Project

resolvent cubic equation

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

11—20 of 456 matching pages

11: 4.43 Cubic Equations
§4.43 Cubic Equations
4.43.2 z 3 + p z + q = 0
12: Viewing DLMF Interactive 3D Graphics
Until these issues are resolved we cannot guarantee that the DLMF WebGL visualizations can be viewed in Internet Explorer. …
13: 28.31 Equations of Whittaker–Hill and Ince
§28.31 Equations of Whittaker–Hill and Ince
§28.31(i) Whittaker–Hill Equation
§28.31(ii) Equation of Ince; Ince Polynomials
ambiguities in sign being resolved by requiring C p m ( x , ξ ) and S p m ( x , ξ ) to be continuous functions of x and positive when x = 0 . … They satisfy the differential equation
14: 3.8 Nonlinear Equations
The equation to be solved is … Sometimes the equation takes the form … If p = 2 , then the convergence is quadratic; if p = 3 , then the convergence is cubic, and so on. … The rule converges locally and is cubically convergent. …
15: 4.21 Identities
4.21.1 sin u ± cos u = 2 sin ( u ± 1 4 π ) = ± 2 cos ( u 1 4 π ) .
4.21.1_5 A cos u + B sin u = A 2 + B 2 cos ( u ph ( A + B i ) ) , A , B ,
In (4.21.21)–(4.21.23) Table 4.16.1 and analytic continuation will assist in resolving sign ambiguities. …
16: Bibliography J
  • D. S. Jones, M. J. Plank, and B. D. Sleeman (2010) Differential equations and mathematical biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • D. S. Jones and B. D. Sleeman (2003) Differential equations and mathematical biology. Chapman & Hall/CRC Mathematical Biology and Medicine Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
  • N. Joshi and A. V. Kitaev (2001) On Boutroux’s tritronquée solutions of the first Painlevé equation. Stud. Appl. Math. 107 (3), pp. 253–291.
  • G. S. Joyce (1973) On the simple cubic lattice Green function. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 273, pp. 583–610.
  • G. S. Joyce (1994) On the cubic lattice Green functions. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 445, pp. 463–477.
  • 17: 28.4 Fourier Series
    Ambiguities in sign are resolved by (28.4.13)–(28.4.16) when q = 0 , and by continuity for the other values of q . …
    28.4.24 A 2 m 2 n ( q ) A 0 2 n ( q ) = ( 1 ) m ( m ! ) 2 ( q 4 ) m π ( 1 + O ( m 1 ) ) w II ( 1 2 π ; a 2 n ( q ) , q ) ,
    28.4.25 A 2 m + 1 2 n + 1 ( q ) A 1 2 n + 1 ( q ) = ( 1 ) m + 1 ( ( 1 2 ) m + 1 ) 2 ( q 4 ) m + 1 2 ( 1 + O ( m 1 ) ) w II ( 1 2 π ; a 2 n + 1 ( q ) , q ) ,
    28.4.26 B 2 m + 1 2 n + 1 ( q ) B 1 2 n + 1 ( q ) = ( 1 ) m ( ( 1 2 ) m + 1 ) 2 ( q 4 ) m + 1 2 ( 1 + O ( m 1 ) ) w I ( 1 2 π ; b 2 n + 1 ( q ) , q ) ,
    28.4.27 B 2 m 2 n + 2 ( q ) B 2 2 n + 2 ( q ) = ( 1 ) m ( m ! ) 2 ( q 4 ) m q π ( 1 + O ( m 1 ) ) w I ( 1 2 π ; b 2 n + 2 ( q ) , q ) .
    18: 23.21 Physical Applications
    The Weierstrass function plays a similar role for cubic potentials in canonical form g 3 + g 2 x 4 x 3 . …
    §23.21(ii) Nonlinear Evolution Equations
    Airault et al. (1977) applies the function to an integrable classical many-body problem, and relates the solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations. For applications to soliton solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation see McKean and Moll (1999, p. 91), Deconinck and Segur (2000), and Walker (1996, §8.1). …
    19: Errata
  • Additions

    Equation (16.16.5_5).

  • Chapters 14 Legendre and Related Functions, 15 Hypergeometric Function

    The Gegenbauer function C α ( λ ) ( z ) , was labeled inadvertently as the ultraspherical (Gegenbauer) polynomial C n ( λ ) ( z ) . In order to resolve this inconsistency, this function now links correctly to its definition. This change affects Gegenbauer functions which appear in §§14.3(iv), 15.9(iii).

  • Chapter 35 Functions of Matrix Argument

    The generalized hypergeometric function of matrix argument F q p ( a 1 , , a p ; b 1 , , b q ; 𝐓 ) , was linked inadvertently as its single variable counterpart F q p ( a 1 , , a p ; b 1 , , b q ; 𝐓 ) . Furthermore, the Jacobi function of matrix argument P ν ( γ , δ ) ( 𝐓 ) , and the Laguerre function of matrix argument L ν ( γ ) ( 𝐓 ) , were also linked inadvertently (and incorrectly) in terms of the single variable counterparts given by P ν ( γ , δ ) ( 𝐓 ) , and L ν ( γ ) ( 𝐓 ) . In order to resolve these inconsistencies, these functions now link correctly to their respective definitions.

  • Subsection 19.25(vi)

    The Weierstrass lattice roots e j , were linked inadvertently as the base of the natural logarithm. In order to resolve this inconsistency, the lattice roots e j , and lattice invariants g 2 , g 3 , now link to their respective definitions (see §§23.2(i), 23.3(i)).

    Reported by Felix Ospald.

  • Equation (14.15.23)

    Four of the terms were rewritten for improved clarity.

  • 20: Bibliography R
  • W. H. Reid (1972) Composite approximations to the solutions of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation. Studies in Appl. Math. 51, pp. 341–368.
  • W. H. Reid (1974a) Uniform asymptotic approximations to the solutions of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation. I. Plane Couette flow. Studies in Appl. Math. 53, pp. 91–110.
  • W. H. Reid (1974b) Uniform asymptotic approximations to the solutions of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation. II. The general theory. Studies in Appl. Math. 53, pp. 217–224.
  • W. H. Reid (1997a) Integral representations for products of Airy functions. II. Cubic products. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 48 (4), pp. 646–655.
  • È. Ya. Riekstynš (1991) Asymptotics and Bounds of the Roots of Equations (Russian). Zinatne, Riga.