About the Project

Whipple 3F2 sum

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

11—20 of 660 matching pages

11: 34.5 Basic Properties: 6 ⁒ j Symbol
β–ΊExamples are provided by: … β–Ί
§34.5(vi) Sums
β–ΊEquations (34.5.15) and (34.5.16) are the sum rules. They constitute addition theorems for the 6 ⁒ j symbol. … β–ΊFor other sums see Ginocchio (1991).
12: 34.3 Basic Properties: 3 ⁒ j Symbol
§34.3 Basic Properties: 3 ⁒ j Symbol
β–Ί
§34.3(ii) Symmetry
β–Ί
§34.3(iv) Orthogonality
β–Ί
§34.3(vi) Sums
β–ΊFor sums of products of 3 ⁒ j symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, pp. 259–262). …
13: 34.4 Definition: 6 ⁒ j Symbol
§34.4 Definition: 6 ⁒ j Symbol
β–ΊThe 6 ⁒ j symbol is defined by the following double sum of products of 3 ⁒ j symbols: … β–ΊExcept in degenerate cases the combination of the triangle inequalities for the four 3 ⁒ j symbols in (34.4.1) is equivalent to the existence of a tetrahedron (possibly degenerate) with edges of lengths j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , l 1 , l 2 , l 3 ; see Figure 34.4.1. … β–ΊThe 6 ⁒ j symbol can be expressed as the finite sumβ–ΊFor alternative expressions for the 6 ⁒ j symbol, written either as a finite sum or as other terminating generalized hypergeometric series F 3 4 of unit argument, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §§9.2.1, 9.2.3).
14: 5.16 Sums
§5.16 Sums
β–Ί
5.16.2 k = 1 1 k ⁒ ψ ⁑ ( k + 1 ) = ΞΆ ⁑ ( 3 ) = 1 2 ⁒ ψ ′′ ⁑ ( 1 ) .
β–ΊFor further sums involving the psi function see Hansen (1975, pp. 360–367). For sums of gamma functions see Andrews et al. (1999, Chapters 2 and 3) and §§15.2(i), 16.2. β–ΊFor related sums involving finite field analogs of the gamma and beta functions (Gauss and Jacobi sums) see Andrews et al. (1999, Chapter 1) and Terras (1999, pp. 90, 149).
15: 34.13 Methods of Computation
§34.13 Methods of Computation
β–ΊMethods of computation for 3 ⁒ j and 6 ⁒ j symbols include recursion relations, see Schulten and Gordon (1975a), Luscombe and Luban (1998), and Edmonds (1974, pp. 42–45, 48–51, 97–99); summation of single-sum expressions for these symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §§8.2.6, 9.2.1) and Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of the generalized hypergeometric functions of unit argument that represent these symbols, see Srinivasa Rao and Venkatesh (1978) and Srinivasa Rao (1981). β–ΊFor 9 ⁒ j symbols, methods include evaluation of the single-sum series (34.6.2), see Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of triple-sum series, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §10.2.1) and Srinivasa Rao et al. (1989). …
16: 34.9 Graphical Method
§34.9 Graphical Method
β–ΊFor specific examples of the graphical method of representing sums involving the 3 ⁒ j , 6 ⁒ j , and 9 ⁒ j symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, Chapters 11, 12) and Lehman and O’Connell (1973, §3.3).
17: 23.9 Laurent and Other Power Series
β–Ί
23.9.1 c n = ( 2 ⁒ n 1 ) ⁒ w 𝕃 βˆ– { 0 } w 2 ⁒ n , n = 2 , 3 , 4 , .
β–Ί
c 3 = 1 28 ⁒ g 3 ⁑ ,
β–Ί
23.9.5 c n = 3 ( 2 ⁒ n + 1 ) ⁒ ( n 3 ) ⁒ m = 2 n 2 c m ⁒ c n m , n 4 .
β–ΊExplicit coefficients c n in terms of c 2 and c 3 are given up to c 19 in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, p. 636). β–ΊFor j = 1 , 2 , 3 , and with e j ⁑ as in §23.3(i), …
18: 34.6 Definition: 9 ⁒ j Symbol
β–ΊThe 9 ⁒ j symbol may be defined either in terms of 3 ⁒ j symbols or equivalently in terms of 6 ⁒ j symbols: β–Ί
34.6.1 { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = all  ⁒ m r ⁒ s ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ⁒ ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ⁒ ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ⁒ ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ⁒ ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 ) ⁒ ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) ,
β–Ί
34.6.2 { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = j ( 1 ) 2 ⁒ j ⁒ ( 2 ⁒ j + 1 ) ⁒ { j 11 j 21 j 31 j 32 j 33 j } ⁒ { j 12 j 22 j 32 j 21 j j 23 } ⁒ { j 13 j 23 j 33 j j 11 j 12 } .
β–ΊThe 9 ⁒ j symbol may also be written as a finite triple sum equivalent to a terminating generalized hypergeometric series of three variables with unit arguments. …
19: 10.19 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Order
β–ΊIn these expansions U k ⁑ ( p ) and V k ⁑ ( p ) are the polynomials in p of degree 3 ⁒ k defined in §10.41(ii). … β–Ίwith sectors of validity 1 2 ⁒ Ο€ + Ξ΄ ± ph ⁑ Ξ½ 3 2 ⁒ Ο€ Ξ΄ . … β–Ί
J Ξ½ ⁑ ( Ξ½ + a ⁒ Ξ½ 1 3 ) 2 2 3 Ξ½ 2 3 ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( 2 1 3 ⁒ a ) ⁒ k = 0 R k ⁑ ( a ) Ξ½ 2 ⁒ k / 3 + 2 1 3 Ξ½ 4 3 ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( 2 1 3 ⁒ a ) ⁒ k = 0 S k ⁑ ( a ) Ξ½ 2 ⁒ k / 3 , | ph ⁑ Ξ½ | 1 2 ⁒ Ο€ Ξ΄ ,
β–Ί
Y Ξ½ ⁑ ( Ξ½ + a ⁒ Ξ½ 1 3 ) 2 2 3 Ξ½ 2 3 ⁒ Bi ⁑ ( 2 1 3 ⁒ a ) ⁒ k = 0 R k ⁑ ( a ) Ξ½ 2 ⁒ k / 3 2 1 3 Ξ½ 4 3 ⁒ Bi ⁑ ( 2 1 3 ⁒ a ) ⁒ k = 0 S k ⁑ ( a ) Ξ½ 2 ⁒ k / 3 , | ph ⁑ Ξ½ | 1 2 ⁒ Ο€ Ξ΄ .
β–Ίwith sectors of validity 1 2 ⁒ Ο€ + Ξ΄ ph ⁑ Ξ½ 3 2 ⁒ Ο€ Ξ΄ and 3 2 ⁒ Ο€ + Ξ΄ ph ⁑ Ξ½ 1 2 ⁒ Ο€ Ξ΄ , respectively. …
20: 23.3 Differential Equations
β–Ίand are denoted by e 1 ⁑ , e 2 ⁑ , e 3 ⁑ . … β–ΊLet g 2 3 ⁑ 27 ⁒ g 3 2 ⁑ , or equivalently Ξ” be nonzero, or e 1 ⁑ , e 2 ⁑ , e 3 ⁑ be distinct. …Similarly for ΞΆ ⁑ ( z ; g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ ) and Οƒ ⁑ ( z ; g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ ) . As functions of g 2 ⁑ and g 3 ⁑ , ⁑ ( z ; g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ ) and ΞΆ ⁑ ( z ; g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ ) are meromorphic and Οƒ ⁑ ( z ; g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ ) is entire. β–ΊConversely, g 2 ⁑ , g 3 ⁑ , and the set { e 1 ⁑ , e 2 ⁑ , e 3 ⁑ } are determined uniquely by the lattice 𝕃 independently of the choice of generators. …