23.9 Laurent and Other Power Series23.11 Integral Representations

§23.10 Addition Theorems and Other Identities

Contents

§23.10(i) Addition Theorems

23.10.1 \mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(u+v\right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(u\right)-{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(v\right)}{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right)-\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right)}\right)^{2}-\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right)-\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right),
23.10.2 \mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(u+v\right)=\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right)+\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime\prime}}}\!\left(u\right)-{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime\prime}}}\!\left(v\right)}{{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(u\right)-{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(v\right)},
23.10.3 \frac{\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u+v\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u-v\right)}{{\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits^{{2}}}\!\left(u\right){\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits^{{2}}}\!\left(v\right)}=\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right)-\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right),
23.10.4 \mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u+v\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u-v\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(x+y\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(x-y\right)+\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(v+x\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(v-x\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u+y\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(u-y\right)+{\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(x+u\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(x-u\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(v+y\right)\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(v-y\right)=0.}

For further addition-type identities for the \mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits-function see Lawden (1989, §6.4).

If u+v+w=0, then

23.10.5 \begin{vmatrix}1&\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right)&{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(u\right)\\
1&\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right)&{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(v\right)\\
1&\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(w\right)&{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(w\right)\end{vmatrix}=0,

and

23.10.6 \left(\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(u\right)+\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(v\right)+\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(w\right)\right)^{2}+{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(u\right)+{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(v\right)+{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(w\right)=0.

§23.10(ii) Duplication Formulas

23.10.7 \mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(2z\right)=-2\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(z\right)+\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime\prime}}}\!\left(z\right)}{{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(z\right)}\right)^{2},
23.10.8 (\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(2z\right)-e_{1}){{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}}^{2}(z)=\left((\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(z\right)-e_{1})^{2}-(e_{1}-e_{2})(e_{1}-e_{3})\right)^{2}.

(23.10.8) continues to hold when e_{1}, e_{2}, e_{3} are permuted cyclically.

23.10.9 \mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(2z\right)=2\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(z\right)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime\prime\prime}}}\!\left(z\right)}{{\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits^{{\prime\prime}}}\!\left(z\right)},
23.10.10 \mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(2z\right)=-{\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits^{{\prime}}}\!\left(z\right){\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits^{{4}}}\!\left(z\right).

§23.10(iii) n-Tuple Formulas

§23.10(iv) Homogeneity

For any nonzero real or complex constant c

23.10.17 \mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(cz|c\mathbb{L}\right)=c^{{-2}}\mathop{\wp\/}\nolimits\!\left(z|\mathbb{L}\right),
23.10.18 \mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(cz|c\mathbb{L}\right)=c^{{-1}}\mathop{\zeta\/}\nolimits\!\left(z|\mathbb{L}\right),
23.10.19 \mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(cz|c\mathbb{L}\right)=c\mathop{\sigma\/}\nolimits\!\left(z|\mathbb{L}\right).

Also, when \mathbb{L} is replaced by c\mathbb{L} the lattice invariants g_{2} and g_{3} are divided by c^{4} and c^{6}, respectively.

For these results and further identities see Lawden (1989, §6.6) and Apostol (1990, p. 14).