About the Project

of%20imaginary%20argument

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

1—10 of 12 matching pages

1: 5.22 Tables
Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 6) tabulates Γ ( x ) , ln Γ ( x ) , ψ ( x ) , and ψ ( x ) for x = 1 ( .005 ) 2 to 10D; ψ ′′ ( x ) and ψ ( 3 ) ( x ) for x = 1 ( .01 ) 2 to 10D; Γ ( n ) , 1 / Γ ( n ) , Γ ( n + 1 2 ) , ψ ( n ) , log 10 Γ ( n ) , log 10 Γ ( n + 1 3 ) , log 10 Γ ( n + 1 2 ) , and log 10 Γ ( n + 2 3 ) for n = 1 ( 1 ) 101 to 8–11S; Γ ( n + 1 ) for n = 100 ( 100 ) 1000 to 20S. … Abramov (1960) tabulates ln Γ ( x + i y ) for x = 1 ( .01 ) 2 , y = 0 ( .01 ) 4 to 6D. Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 6) tabulates ln Γ ( x + i y ) for x = 1 ( .1 ) 2 , y = 0 ( .1 ) 10 to 12D. This reference also includes ψ ( x + i y ) for the same arguments to 5D. Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 70, 71, and 73) tabulates the real and imaginary parts of Γ ( x + i y ) , ln Γ ( x + i y ) , and ψ ( x + i y ) for x = 0.5 , 1 , 5 , 10 , y = 0 ( .5 ) 10 to 8S.
2: Software Index
3: Bibliography B
  • G. Backenstoss (1970) Pionic atoms. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 20, pp. 467–508.
  • A. Bañuelos and R. A. Depine (1980) A program for computing the Riemann zeta function for complex argument. Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 441–445.
  • R. Barakat (1961) Evaluation of the incomplete gamma function of imaginary argument by Chebyshev polynomials. Math. Comp. 15 (73), pp. 7–11.
  • K. L. Bell and N. S. Scott (1980) Coulomb functions (negative energies). Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 447–458.
  • W. Bühring (1992) Generalized hypergeometric functions at unit argument. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1), pp. 145–153.
  • 4: Bibliography D
  • B. Döring (1966) Complex zeros of cylinder functions. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 215–222.
  • C. F. du Toit (1993) Bessel functions J n ( z ) and Y n ( z ) of integer order and complex argument. Comput. Phys. Comm. 78 (1-2), pp. 181–189.
  • T. M. Dunster (1989) Uniform asymptotic expansions for Whittaker’s confluent hypergeometric functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (3), pp. 744–760.
  • T. M. Dunster (1990a) Bessel functions of purely imaginary order, with an application to second-order linear differential equations having a large parameter. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21 (4), pp. 995–1018.
  • T. M. Dunster (2013) Conical functions of purely imaginary order and argument. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 143 (5), pp. 929–955.
  • 5: 20.10 Integrals
    20.10.1 0 x s 1 θ 2 ( 0 | i x 2 ) d x = 2 s ( 1 2 s ) π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 1 ,
    20.10.2 0 x s 1 ( θ 3 ( 0 | i x 2 ) 1 ) d x = π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 1 ,
    20.10.3 0 x s 1 ( 1 θ 4 ( 0 | i x 2 ) ) d x = ( 1 2 1 s ) π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 0 .
    Let s , , and β be constants such that s > 0 , > 0 , and | β | + | β | . … For corresponding results for argument derivatives of the theta functions see Erdélyi et al. (1954a, pp. 224–225) or Oberhettinger and Badii (1973, p. 193). …
    6: 9.18 Tables
  • Miller (1946) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) for x = 20 ( .01 ) 2 ; log 10 Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) / Ai ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 25 ( 1 ) 75 ; Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 10 ( .1 ) 2.5 ; log 10 Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) / Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ; M ( x ) , N ( x ) , θ ( x ) , ϕ ( x ) (respectively F ( x ) , G ( x ) , χ ( x ) , ψ ( x ) ) for x = 80 ( 1 ) 30 ( .1 ) 0 . Precision is generally 8D; slightly less for some of the auxiliary functions. Extracts from these tables are included in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10), together with some auxiliary functions for large arguments.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 337) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) , Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( 1 ) 20 to 8S and for x = 20 ( 1 ) 0 to 9D.

  • Miller (1946) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; b k , Bi ( b k ) , b k , Bi ( b k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 . Precision is 8D. Entries for k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 are reproduced in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10).

  • Sherry (1959) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; 20S.

  • Corless et al. (1992) gives the real and imaginary parts of β k for k = 1 ( 1 ) 13 ; 14S.

  • 7: Bibliography G
  • W. Gautschi (1965) Algorithm 259: Legendre functions for arguments larger than one. Comm. ACM 8 (8), pp. 488–492.
  • A. Gervois and H. Navelet (1984) Some integrals involving three Bessel functions when their arguments satisfy the triangle inequalities. J. Math. Phys. 25 (11), pp. 3350–3356.
  • A. Gil, J. Segura, and N. M. Temme (2004a) Algorithm 831: Modified Bessel functions of imaginary order and positive argument. ACM Trans. Math. Software 30 (2), pp. 159–164.
  • A. Gil, J. Segura, and N. M. Temme (2004b) Computing solutions of the modified Bessel differential equation for imaginary orders and positive arguments. ACM Trans. Math. Software 30 (2), pp. 145–158.
  • A. Gil, J. Segura, and N. M. Temme (2014) Algorithm 939: computation of the Marcum Q-function. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 40 (3), pp. 20:1–20:21.
  • 8: 22.3 Graphics
    sn ( x , k ) , cn ( x , k ) , and dn ( x , k ) as functions of real arguments x and k . …
    See accompanying text
    Figure 22.3.26: Density plot of | sn ( 5 , k ) | as a function of complex k 2 , 10 ( k 2 ) 20 , 10 ( k 2 ) 10 . … Magnify
    See accompanying text
    Figure 22.3.27: Density plot of | sn ( 10 , k ) | as a function of complex k 2 , 10 ( k 2 ) 20 , 10 ( k 2 ) 10 . … Magnify
    See accompanying text
    Figure 22.3.28: Density plot of | sn ( 20 , k ) | as a function of complex k 2 , 10 ( k 2 ) 20 , 10 ( k 2 ) 10 . … Magnify
    See accompanying text
    Figure 22.3.29: Density plot of | sn ( 30 , k ) | as a function of complex k 2 , 10 ( k 2 ) 20 , 10 ( k 2 ) 10 . … Magnify
    9: 20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
    20.11.1 G ( m , n ) = k = 0 n 1 e π i k 2 m / n ;
    If both m , n are positive, then G ( m , n ) allows inversion of its arguments as a modular transformation (compare (23.15.3) and (23.15.4)):
    20.11.2 1 n G ( m , n ) = 1 n k = 0 n 1 e π i k 2 m / n = e π i / 4 m j = 0 m 1 e π i j 2 n / m = e π i / 4 m G ( n , m ) .
    With the substitutions a = q e 2 i z , b = q e 2 i z , with q = e i π τ , we have …
    10: 25.6 Integer Arguments
    §25.6 Integer Arguments
    §25.6(i) Function Values
    25.6.3 ζ ( n ) = B n + 1 n + 1 , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .
    §25.6(ii) Derivative Values
    25.6.13 ( 1 ) k ζ ( k ) ( 2 n ) = 2 ( 1 ) n ( 2 π ) 2 n + 1 m = 0 k r = 0 m ( k m ) ( m r ) ( c k m ) Γ ( r ) ( 2 n + 1 ) ζ ( m r ) ( 2 n + 1 ) ,