§19.9 Inequalities
Contents
§19.9(i) Complete Integrals
Throughout this subsection
, except in (19.9.4).
The left-hand inequalities in (19.9.2) and (19.9.3) are
equivalent, but the right-hand inequality of (19.9.3) is sharper
than that of (19.9.2) when
.
for
.
The lower bound in (19.9.4) is sharper than
when
.
For a sharper, but more complicated, version of (19.9.5) see Anderson et al. (1990).
Other inequalities are:
Further inequalities for
and
can be found
in Alzer and Qiu (2004), Anderson et al. (1992a, b, 1997), and Qiu and Vamanamurthy (1996).
The perimeter
of an ellipse with semiaxes
is given by
Almkvist and Berndt (1988) list thirteen approximations to
that have
been proposed by various authors. The earliest is due to Kepler and the most
accurate to Ramanujan. Ramanujan’s approximation and its leading error term
yield the following approximation to
:
Even for the extremely eccentric ellipse with
and
, this is
correct within 0.023%.
Barnard et al. (2000) shows that nine of the thirteen approximations,
including Ramanujan’s, are from below and four are from above. See also
Barnard et al. (2001).
§19.9(ii) Incomplete Integrals
Throughout this subsection we assume that
,
, and
.
Simple inequalities for incomplete integrals follow directly from the defining integrals (§19.2(ii)) together with (19.6.12):
where
is given by (4.23.41) and
(4.23.42). Also,
Sharper inequalities for
are:
(19.9.15) is useful when
and
are both close
to 1, since the bounds are then nearly equal; otherwise (19.9.14)
is preferable.
Inequalities for both
and
involving
inverse circular or inverse hyperbolic functions are given in
Carlson (1961b, §4). For example,
where

