About the Project

generalized functions

AdvancedHelp

(0.010 seconds)

31—40 of 376 matching pages

31: 16.5 Integral Representations and Integrals
§16.5 Integral Representations and Integrals
where the contour of integration separates the poles of Γ ( a k + s ) , k = 1 , , p , from those of Γ ( s ) . … Lastly, when p > q + 1 the right-hand side of (16.5.1) can be regarded as the definition of the (customarily undefined) left-hand side. … Laplace transforms and inverse Laplace transforms of generalized hypergeometric functions are given in Prudnikov et al. (1992a, §3.38) and Prudnikov et al. (1992b, §3.36). …
32: 16.18 Special Cases
§16.18 Special Cases
The F 1 1 and F 1 2 functions introduced in Chapters 13 and 15, as well as the more general F q p functions introduced in the present chapter, are all special cases of the Meijer G -function. …
16.18.1 F q p ( a 1 , , a p b 1 , , b q ; z ) = ( k = 1 q Γ ( b k ) / k = 1 p Γ ( a k ) ) G p , q + 1 1 , p ( z ; 1 a 1 , , 1 a p 0 , 1 b 1 , , 1 b q ) = ( k = 1 q Γ ( b k ) / k = 1 p Γ ( a k ) ) G q + 1 , p p , 1 ( 1 z ; 1 , b 1 , , b q a 1 , , a p ) .
33: 10.39 Relations to Other Functions
34: 16.10 Expansions in Series of F q p Functions
§16.10 Expansions in Series of F q p Functions
16.10.1 F q + s p + r ( a 1 , , a p , c 1 , , c r b 1 , , b q , d 1 , , d s ; z ζ ) = k = 0 ( 𝐚 ) k ( α ) k ( β ) k ( z ) k ( 𝐛 ) k ( γ + k ) k k ! F q + 1 p + 2 ( α + k , β + k , a 1 + k , , a p + k γ + 2 k + 1 , b 1 + k , , b q + k ; z ) F s + 2 r + 2 ( k , γ + k , c 1 , , c r α , β , d 1 , , d s ; ζ ) .
Expansions of the form n = 1 ( ± 1 ) n F p + 1 p ( 𝐚 ; 𝐛 ; n 2 z 2 ) are discussed in Miller (1997), and further series of generalized hypergeometric functions are given in Luke (1969b, Chapter 9), Luke (1975, §§5.10.2 and 5.11), and Prudnikov et al. (1990, §§5.3, 6.8–6.9).
35: 18.34 Bessel Polynomials
§18.34(i) Definitions and Recurrence Relation
For the confluent hypergeometric function F 1 1 and the generalized hypergeometric function F 0 2 , the Laguerre polynomial L n ( α ) and the Whittaker function W κ , μ see §16.2(ii), §16.2(iv), (18.5.12), and (13.14.3), respectively.
18.34.1 y n ( x ; a ) = F 0 2 ( n , n + a 1 ; x 2 ) = ( n + a 1 ) n ( x 2 ) n F 1 1 ( n 2 n a + 2 ; 2 x ) = n ! ( 1 2 x ) n L n ( 1 a 2 n ) ( 2 x 1 ) = ( 1 2 x ) 1 1 2 a e 1 / x W 1 1 2 a , 1 2 ( a 1 ) + n ( 2 x 1 ) .
18.34.7_1 ϕ n ( x ; λ ) = e λ e x ( 2 λ e x ) λ 1 2 y n ( λ 1 e x ; 2 2 λ ) / n ! = ( 1 ) n e λ e x ( 2 λ e x ) λ n 1 2 L n ( 2 λ 2 n 1 ) ( 2 λ e x ) = ( 2 λ ) 1 2 e x / 2 W λ , n + 1 2 λ ( 2 λ e x ) / n ! , n = 0 , 1 , , N = λ 3 2 , λ > 1 2 ,
36: 10.16 Relations to Other Functions
37: 4.44 Other Applications
For applications of generalized exponentials and generalized logarithms to computer arithmetic see §3.1(iv). For an application of the Lambert W -function to generalized Gaussian noise see Chapeau-Blondeau and Monir (2002). …
38: 8.21 Generalized Sine and Cosine Integrals
From §§8.2(i) and 8.2(ii) it follows that each of the four functions si ( a , z ) , ci ( a , z ) , Si ( a , z ) , and Ci ( a , z ) is a multivalued function of z with branch point at z = 0 . Furthermore, si ( a , z ) and ci ( a , z ) are entire functions of a , and Si ( a , z ) and Ci ( a , z ) are meromorphic functions of a with simple poles at a = 1 , 3 , 5 , and a = 0 , 2 , 4 , , respectively. … From here on it is assumed that unless indicated otherwise the functions si ( a , z ) , ci ( a , z ) , Si ( a , z ) , and Ci ( a , z ) have their principal values. …
Spherical-Bessel-Function Expansions
§8.21(vii) Auxiliary Functions
39: 18.20 Hahn Class: Explicit Representations
§18.20(ii) Hypergeometric Function and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
For the definition of hypergeometric and generalized hypergeometric functions see §16.2. …
40: 34.13 Methods of Computation
Methods of computation for 3 j and 6 j symbols include recursion relations, see Schulten and Gordon (1975a), Luscombe and Luban (1998), and Edmonds (1974, pp. 42–45, 48–51, 97–99); summation of single-sum expressions for these symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §§8.2.6, 9.2.1) and Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of the generalized hypergeometric functions of unit argument that represent these symbols, see Srinivasa Rao and Venkatesh (1978) and Srinivasa Rao (1981). …