About the Project

reduction to basic elliptic integrals

AdvancedHelp

(0.004 seconds)

21—30 of 907 matching pages

21: Bibliography G
  • F. Gao and V. J. W. Guo (2013) Contiguous relations and summation and transformation formulae for basic hypergeometric series. J. Difference Equ. Appl. 19 (12), pp. 2029–2042.
  • G. Gasper and M. Rahman (1990) Basic Hypergeometric Series. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • M. L. Glasser (1976) Definite integrals of the complete elliptic integral K . J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect. B 80B (2), pp. 313–323.
  • N. Gray (2002) Automatic reduction of elliptic integrals using Carlson’s relations. Math. Comp. 71 (237), pp. 311–318.
  • R. A. Gustafson (1987) Multilateral summation theorems for ordinary and basic hypergeometric series in U ( n ) . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 18 (6), pp. 1576–1596.
  • 22: 19.1 Special Notation
    All derivatives are denoted by differentials, not by primes. … We use also the function D ( ϕ , k ) , introduced by Jahnke et al. (1966, p. 43). … In Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 17) the functions (19.1.1) and (19.1.2) are denoted, in order, by K ( α ) , E ( α ) , Π ( n \ α ) , F ( ϕ \ α ) , E ( ϕ \ α ) , and Π ( n ; ϕ \ α ) , where α = arcsin k and n is the α 2 (not related to k ) in (19.1.1) and (19.1.2). …However, it should be noted that in Chapter 8 of Abramowitz and Stegun (1964) the notation used for elliptic integrals differs from Chapter 17 and is consistent with that used in the present chapter and the rest of the NIST Handbook and DLMF. … R a ( b 1 , b 2 , , b n ; z 1 , z 2 , , z n ) is a multivariate hypergeometric function that includes all the functions in (19.1.3). …
    23: Bibliography N
  • W. J. Nellis and B. C. Carlson (1966) Reduction and evaluation of elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 223–231.
  • E. Neuman (1969a) Elliptic integrals of the second and third kinds. Zastos. Mat. 11, pp. 99–102.
  • E. Neuman (1969b) On the calculation of elliptic integrals of the second and third kinds. Zastos. Mat. 11, pp. 91–94.
  • E. Neuman (2003) Bounds for symmetric elliptic integrals. J. Approx. Theory 122 (2), pp. 249–259.
  • Number Theory Web (website)
  • 24: 16.16 Transformations of Variables
    §16.16(i) Reduction Formulas
    See Erdélyi et al. (1953a, §5.10) for these and further reduction formulas. …
    25: 15.11 Riemann’s Differential Equation
    15.11.1 d 2 w d z 2 + ( 1 a 1 a 2 z α + 1 b 1 b 2 z β + 1 c 1 c 2 z γ ) d w d z + ( ( α β ) ( α γ ) a 1 a 2 z α + ( β α ) ( β γ ) b 1 b 2 z β + ( γ α ) ( γ β ) c 1 c 2 z γ ) w ( z α ) ( z β ) ( z γ ) = 0 ,
    These constants can be chosen to map any two sets of three distinct points { α , β , γ } and { α ~ , β ~ , γ ~ } onto each other. …The reduction of a general homogeneous linear differential equation of the second order with at most three regular singularities to the hypergeometric differential equation is given by …
    26: 19.36 Methods of Computation
    The reductions in §19.29(i) represent x , y , z as squares, for example x = U 12 2 in (19.29.4). … Because of cancellations in (19.26.21) it is advisable to compute R G from R F and R D by (19.21.10) or else to use §19.36(ii). … Descending Gauss transformations of Π ( ϕ , α 2 , k ) (see (19.8.20)) are used in Fettis (1965) to compute a large table (see §19.37(iii)). … Quadratic transformations can be applied to compute Bulirsch’s integrals19.2(iii)). …
    27: 19.35 Other Applications
    §19.35(i) Mathematical
    Generalizations of elliptic integrals appear in analysis of modular theorems of Ramanujan (Anderson et al. (2000)); analysis of Selberg integrals (Van Diejen and Spiridonov (2001)); use of Legendre’s relation (19.7.1) to compute π to high precision (Borwein and Borwein (1987, p. 26)).
    §19.35(ii) Physical
    28: 20.7 Identities
    Also, in further development along the lines of the notations of Neville (§20.1) and of Glaisher (§22.2), the identities (20.7.6)–(20.7.9) have been recast in a more symmetric manner with respect to suffices 2 , 3 , 4 . The symmetry, applicable also to §§20.7(iii) and 20.7(vii), is obtained by modifying traditional theta functions in the manner recommended by Carlson (2011) and used for further purposes by Fukushima (2012). …
    §20.7(iv) Reduction Formulas for Products
    §20.7(vi) Landen Transformations
    §20.7(ix) Addendum to 20.7(iv) Reduction Formulas for Products
    29: Bibliography W
  • S. S. Wagstaff (1978) The irregular primes to 125000 . Math. Comp. 32 (142), pp. 583–591.
  • P. L. Walker (2009) The distribution of the zeros of Jacobian elliptic functions with respect to the parameter k . Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 9 (2), pp. 579–591.
  • P. L. Walker (2012) Reduction formulae for products of theta functions. J. Res. Nat. Inst. Standards and Technology 117, pp. 297–303.
  • L. C. Washington (1997) Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields. 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • A. Weil (1999) Elliptic Functions According to Eisenstein and Kronecker. Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • 30: Bibliography L
  • G. Labahn and M. Mutrie (1997) Reduction of Elliptic Integrals to Legendre Normal Form. Technical report Technical Report 97-21, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
  • D. K. Lee (1990) Application of theta functions for numerical evaluation of complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds. Comput. Phys. Comm. 60 (3), pp. 319–327.
  • J. L. López (2001) Uniform asymptotic expansions of symmetric elliptic integrals. Constr. Approx. 17 (4), pp. 535–559.
  • Y. L. Luke (1968) Approximations for elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 22 (103), pp. 627–634.
  • Y. L. Luke (1970) Further approximations for elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 24 (109), pp. 191–198.