About the Project

integral identities

AdvancedHelp

(0.004 seconds)

31—40 of 61 matching pages

31: 2.5 Mellin Transform Methods
when this integral converges. … When x = 1 , this identity is a Parseval-type formula; compare §1.14(iv). … To ensure that the integral (2.5.3) converges we assume that … where … To verify (2.5.48) we may use …
32: 25.5 Integral Representations
25.5.6 ζ ( s ) = 1 2 + 1 s 1 + 1 Γ ( s ) 0 ( 1 e x 1 1 x + 1 2 ) x s 1 e x d x , s > 1 .
33: Bibliography B
  • R. J. Baxter (1981) Rogers-Ramanujan identities in the hard hexagon model. J. Statist. Phys. 26 (3), pp. 427–452.
  • A. Berkovich and B. M. McCoy (1998) Rogers-Ramanujan Identities: A Century of Progress from Mathematics to Physics. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. III (Berlin, 1998), pp. 163–172.
  • M. V. Berry and F. J. Wright (1980) Phase-space projection identities for diffraction catastrophes. J. Phys. A 13 (1), pp. 149–160.
  • J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein (1991) A cubic counterpart of Jacobi’s identity and the AGM. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 323 (2), pp. 691–701.
  • J. L. Burchnall and T. W. Chaundy (1948) The hypergeometric identities of Cayley, Orr, and Bailey. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 50, pp. 56–74.
  • 34: 2.4 Contour Integrals
    §2.4 Contour Integrals
    §2.4(i) Watson’s Lemma
    Then by integration by parts the integralIf p ( t 0 ) 0 , then μ = 1 , λ is a positive integer, and the two resulting asymptotic expansions are identical. … Consider the integral
    35: 20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
    This is the discrete analog of the Poisson identity1.8(iv)). … In the case z = 0 identities for theta functions become identities in the complex variable q , with | q | < 1 , that involve rational functions, power series, and continued fractions; see Adiga et al. (1985), McKean and Moll (1999, pp. 156–158), and Andrews et al. (1988, §10.7). … As in §20.11(ii), the modulus k of elliptic integrals19.2(ii)), Jacobian elliptic functions (§22.2), and Weierstrass elliptic functions (§23.6(ii)) can be expanded in q -series via (20.9.1). … Similar identities can be constructed for F 1 2 ( 1 3 , 2 3 ; 1 ; k 2 ) , F 1 2 ( 1 4 , 3 4 ; 1 ; k 2 ) , and F 1 2 ( 1 6 , 5 6 ; 1 ; k 2 ) . …
    36: 18.2 General Orthogonal Polynomials
    More generally than (18.2.1)–(18.2.3), w ( x ) d x may be replaced in (18.2.1) by d μ ( x ) , where the measure μ is the Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure μ α corresponding to a bounded nondecreasing function α on the closure of ( a , b ) with an infinite number of points of increase, and such that a b | x | n d μ ( x ) < for all n . … The constant function p 0 ( x ) will often, but not always, be identically 1 (see, for example, (18.2.11_8)), p 1 ( x ) = 0 in all cases, by convention, as indicated in §18.1(i). … As in §18.1(i) we assume that p 1 ( x ) 0 . …
    v ( x 2 ) w ( x ) .
    v ( 2 x 2 1 ) w ( x ) .
    37: 17.2 Calculus
    §17.2(v) Integrals
    If f ( x ) is continuous at x = 0 , then …
    17.2.47 lim q 1 0 a f ( x ) d q x = 0 a f ( x ) d x .
    §17.2(vi) Rogers–Ramanujan Identities
    These identities are the first in a large collection of similar results. …
    38: 25.11 Hurwitz Zeta Function
    25.11.27 ζ ( s , a ) = 1 2 a s + a 1 s s 1 + 1 Γ ( s ) 0 ( 1 e x 1 1 x + 1 2 ) x s 1 e a x d x , s > 1 , s 1 , a > 0 .
    39: Errata
  • Equation (25.15.6)
    25.15.6 G ( χ ) r = 1 k 1 χ ( r ) e 2 π i r / k .

    The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was k , was replaced with k 1 since χ ( k ) = 0 .

    Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23

  • Notation

    The overloaded operator is now more clearly separated (and linked) to two distinct cases: equivalence by definition (in §§1.4(ii), 1.4(v), 2.7(i), 2.10(iv), 3.1(i), 3.1(iv), 4.18, 9.18(ii), 9.18(vi), 9.18(vi), 18.2(iv), 20.2(iii), 20.7(vi), 23.20(ii), 25.10(i), 26.15, 31.17(i)); and modular equivalence (in §§24.10(i), 24.10(ii), 24.10(iii), 24.10(iv), 24.15(iii), 24.19(ii), 26.14(i), 26.21, 27.2(i), 27.8, 27.9, 27.11, 27.12, 27.14(v), 27.14(vi), 27.15, 27.16, 27.19).

  • Subsection 5.2(iii)

    Three new identities for Pochhammer’s symbol (5.2.6)–(5.2.8) have been added at the end of this subsection.

    Suggested by Tom Koornwinder.

  • Equation (36.10.14)
    36.10.14 3 ( 2 Ψ ( E ) x 2 2 Ψ ( E ) y 2 ) + 2 i z Ψ ( E ) x x Ψ ( E ) = 0

    Originally this equation appeared with Ψ ( H ) x in the second term, rather than Ψ ( E ) x .

    Reported 2010-04-02.

  • Notations

    The definition of R C ( x , y ) was revised in Notations.

  • 40: 27.12 Asymptotic Formulas: Primes
    For the logarithmic integral li ( x ) see (6.2.8). … π ( x ) li ( x ) changes sign infinitely often as x ; see Littlewood (1914), Bays and Hudson (2000). …
    27.12.7 | π ( x ) li ( x ) | < 1 8 π x ln x .
    For example, if 2 n 2 ( mod n ) , then n is composite. … A Carmichael number is a composite number n for which b n b ( mod n ) for all b . …