About the Project

boundary conditions and the Weyl alternative

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—20 of 36 matching pages

11: 18.39 Applications in the Physical Sciences
The solutions of (18.39.8) are subject to boundary conditions at a and b . … Namely the k th eigenfunction, listed in order of increasing eigenvalues, starting at k = 0 , has precisely k nodes, as real zeros of wave-functions away from boundaries are often referred to. … An alternative, and often used, form of (18.39.25) is that for the spherical radial function ψ n , l ( r ) = r R n , l ( r ) , … These cases correspond to the two distinct orthogonality conditions of (18.35.6) and (18.35.6_3). … The Coulomb–Pollaczek polynomials provide alternate representations of the positive energy Coulomb wave functions of Chapter 33. …
12: 27.13 Functions
If 3 k = q 2 k + r with 0 < r < 2 k , then equality holds in (27.13.2) provided r + q 2 k , a condition that is satisfied with at most a finite number of exceptions. …
27.13.4 ϑ ( x ) = 1 + 2 m = 1 x m 2 , | x | < 1 .
27.13.5 ( ϑ ( x ) ) 2 = 1 + n = 1 r 2 ( n ) x n .
27.13.6 ( ϑ ( x ) ) 2 = 1 + 4 n = 1 ( δ 1 ( n ) δ 3 ( n ) ) x n ,
13: Mathematical Introduction
This section may also include important alternative notations that have appeared in the literature. … In the corresponding section for the DLMF some of the alternative notations that appear in the first section of the special function chapters are also included. … Lastly, users may notice some lack of smoothness in the color boundaries of some of the 4D-type surfaces; see, for example, Figure 10.3.9. This nonsmoothness arises because the mesh that was used to generate the figure was optimized only for smoothness of the surface, and not for smoothness of the color boundaries. …
14: 18.37 Classical OP’s in Two or More Variables
The following three conditions, taken together, determine R m , n ( α ) ( z ) uniquely: … Orthogonal polynomials associated with root systems are certain systems of trigonometric polynomials in several variables, symmetric under a certain finite group (Weyl group), and orthogonal on a torus. …
15: Bibliography
  • V. I. Arnol’d (1972) Normal forms of functions near degenerate critical points, the Weyl groups A k , D k , E k and Lagrangian singularities. Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 6 (4), pp. 3–25 (Russian).
  • U. M. Ascher, R. M. M. Mattheij, and R. D. Russell (1995) Numerical Solution of Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations. Classics in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 13, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA.
  • 16: 10.22 Integrals
    Sufficient conditions for the validity of (10.22.77) are that 0 | f ( x ) | d x < when ν 1 2 , or that 0 | f ( x ) | d x < and 0 1 x ν + 1 2 | f ( x ) | d x < when 1 < ν < 1 2 ; see Titchmarsh (1986a, Theorem 135, Chapter 8) and Akhiezer (1988, p. 62). … These are examples of the self-adjoint extensions and the Weyl alternatives of §1.18(ix). …A sufficient condition for the validity is a | f ( y ) | d y < . …Sufficient conditions for the validity of (10.22.79) are that 0 | f ( x ) | d x < when 0 < ν 1 2 , or that 0 | f ( x ) | d x < and 0 1 x 1 2 ν | f ( x ) | d x < when 1 2 < ν < 1 ; see Titchmarsh (1962a, pp. 88–90). …
    17: 16.11 Asymptotic Expansions
    (If this condition is violated, then the definition of H p , q ( z ) has to be modified so that the residues are those associated with the multiple poles. …
    18: 16.5 Integral Representations and Integrals
    Then the integral converges when p < q + 1 provided that z 0 , or when p = q + 1 provided that 0 < | z | < 1 , and provides an integral representation of the left-hand side with these conditions. …
    16.5.2 F q + 1 p + 1 ( a 0 , , a p b 0 , , b q ; z ) = Γ ( b 0 ) Γ ( a 0 ) Γ ( b 0 a 0 ) 0 1 t a 0 1 ( 1 t ) b 0 a 0 1 F q p ( a 1 , , a p b 1 , , b q ; z t ) d t , b 0 > a 0 > 0 ,
    19: 16.4 Argument Unity
    16.4.2_5 F 2 3 ( n , a , 1 n , c ; 1 ) = k = 0 n ( a ) k ( c ) k = c 1 c a 1 ( 1 ( a ) n + 1 ( c 1 ) n + 1 ) ,
    16.4.5 F 2 3 ( n , b , c 1 b n , 1 c n ; 1 ) = { 0 , n = 2 k + 1 , ( 2 k ) ! Γ ( b + k ) Γ ( c + k ) Γ ( b + c + 2 k ) k ! Γ ( b + 2 k ) Γ ( c + 2 k ) Γ ( b + c + k ) , n = 2 k ,
    16.4.7 F 2 3 ( a , 1 a , c d , 2 c d + 1 ; 1 ) = π Γ ( d ) Γ ( 2 c d + 1 ) 2 1 2 c Γ ( c + 1 2 ( a d + 1 ) ) Γ ( c + 1 1 2 ( a + d ) ) Γ ( 1 2 ( a + d ) ) Γ ( 1 2 ( d a + 1 ) ) ,
    The last condition is equivalent to the sum of the top parameters plus 2 equals the sum of the bottom parameters, that is, the series is 2-balanced. …
    20: 2.10 Sums and Sequences
    Sufficient conditions for the validity of this second result are: … First, the conditions can be weakened. …For example, Condition (b) can be replaced by: … Furthermore, (2.10.31) remains valid with the weaker conditionIn Condition (c) we have …