Buy Plaquenil - www.RxLara.net - Price Hydroxychloroquine sulfate 200mg. For lupus, arthritis. Get online - RXLARA.NET

SearchAdvancedHelp

Did you mean Buy quesn - www.barnett - Price hydrologe slatere 200mg. For lucas, artists. Get online - barnett ?

(0.004 seconds)

1—10 of 28 matching pages

1: 25.10 Zeros

… ►More than 41% of all the zeros in the critical strip lie on the critical line (Bui et al. (2011)). …

2: Browsers

… ►Although we have attempted to follow standards and maintain backwards compatibility with older browsers, you will generally get the best results by upgrading to the latest version of your preferred browser.

3: Bibliography B

… ►

Numerical evaluation of the zero-order Hankel transform using Filon quadrature philosophy. Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (5), pp. 21–26.

ⓘ

External Links:

ISSN 0893-9659, Document, MathReview, ZentralBlatt

Referenced by:

§10.74(vii).

Encodings:

BibTeX

… ►

Irregular primes to one million. Math. Comp. 59 (200), pp. 717–722.

ⓘ

External Links:

ISSN 0025-5718, FullText, MathReview (Duncan A. Buell), ZentralBlatt

Referenced by:

2nd item.

Encodings:

BibTeX

… ►

More than 41% of the zeros of the zeta function are on the critical line. Acta Arith. 150 (1), pp. 35–64.

ⓘ

External Links:

ISSN 0065-1036, Document, Link, MathReview (Timothy S. Trudgian), ZentralBlatt

Referenced by:

§25.10(ii), §25.10(ii), Erratum (V1.1.4) for Subsection 25.10(ii).

Encodings:

BibTeX

…

4: 21.1 Special Notation

… ► ►►►

$g,h$	positive integers.
…
$a\circ b$	intersection index of $a$ and $b$, two cycles lying on a closed surface. $a\circ b=0$ if $a$ and $b$ do not intersect. Otherwise $a\circ b$ gets an additive contribution from every intersection point. This contribution is $1$ if the basis of the tangent vectors of the $a$ and $b$ cycles (§21.7(i)) at the point of intersection is positively oriented; otherwise it is $-1$.
…

…

5: Guide to Searching the DLMF

… ►Be careful, however, because if you put quotes around math expressions involving math symbols, you may not get the matches you’d expect. …

6: 4.10 Integrals

…

7: 19.22 Quadratic Transformations

… ►

19.22.5 $$2p_{\pm }=\sqrt{(p+x)(p+y)}\pm \sqrt{(p-x)(p-y)},$$

ⓘ

Defines:

$p_{\pm }$: modified parameter (locally)

Referenced by:

§19.22(iii), §19.22(iii)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.22.E5

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

See also:

Annotations for §19.22(i), §19.22 and Ch.19

… ►

$4(p_{\pm }^2-a^2)={(\sqrt{p^2-x^2}\pm \sqrt{p^2-y^2})}^2.$

… ►

$2z_{\pm }=\sqrt{(z+x)(z+y)}\pm \sqrt{(z-x)(z-y)},$

… ►

$4(z_{\pm }^2-a^2)={(\sqrt{z^2-x^2}\pm \sqrt{z^2-y^2})}^2.$

… ►However, if $x$ and $y$ are complex conjugates and $z$ and $p$ are real, then the right-hand sides of all transformations in §§19.22(i) and 19.22(iii)—except (19.22.3) and (19.22.22)—are free of complex numbers and $p_{\pm }^2-p_{\mp }^2=\pm |p^2-x^2|\ne 0$. …

8: 1.11 Zeros of Polynomials

… ►Add $-\frac{1}{4}a$ to the roots of $g(w)=0$ to get those of $f(z)=0$. …

9: Errata

… ►

In the paragraph immediately below (25.10.4), it was originally stated that “more than one-third of all zeros in the critical strip lie on the critical line.” which referred to Levinson (1974). This sentence has been updated with “one-third” being replaced with “41%” now referring to Bui et al. (2011) (suggested by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23).

…

10: 19.25 Relations to Other Functions

… ►

19.25.35 $$z+2\omega =\pm R_F(\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_1,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_2,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_3),$$

ⓘ

Symbols:

$R_F(x,y,z)$: symmetric elliptic integral of first kind, $\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$ (= $\mathrm{\wp }\left(z|𝕃\right)$ = $\mathrm{\wp }(z;g_2,g_3)$): Weierstrass $\mathrm{\wp }$-function, $e_j$: Weierstrass lattice roots and $z$: complex number

Proof sketch:

Use (23.6.36) with $z=\mathrm{\wp }\left(\omega \right)$ as prescribed in the text that follows (23.6.36), substitute $u=t+\mathrm{\wp }\left(\omega \right)$ and compare with (19.16.1). The undetermined $\pm$ is a consequence of the multivaluedness of the square-roots in (19.16.4).

Referenced by:

(19.25.38), (19.25.40), §19.25(v), §19.25(vi), §19.25(vi), §20.9(i), Erratum (V1.1.0) for Subsection 19.25(vi)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.25.E35

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Correction (effective with 1.1.0):

This equation has been corrected, namely the left-hand side which was originally $z$, has been replaced by $z+2\omega$ and the right-hand side has been multiplied by $\pm 1$.

See also:

Annotations for §19.25(vi), §19.25 and Ch.19

… ►

19.25.36 $$\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_j\in ℂ\setminus (-\mathrm{\infty },0],$$ $j=1,2,3.$

ⓘ

Symbols:

$\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$ (= $\mathrm{\wp }\left(z|𝕃\right)$ = $\mathrm{\wp }(z;g_2,g_3)$): Weierstrass $\mathrm{\wp }$-function, $e_j$: Weierstrass lattice roots, $ℂ$: complex plane, $\in$: element of, $(a,b]$: half-closed interval, $\setminus$: set subtraction, $j$: $(=1,2,3)$ and $z$: complex number

Referenced by:

(19.25.39)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.25.E36

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

See also:

Annotations for §19.25(vi), §19.25 and Ch.19

… ►

19.25.37 $$\zeta \left(z+2\omega \right)+(z+2\omega )\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)=\pm 2R_G(\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_1,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_2,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_3),$$

ⓘ

Symbols:

$R_G(x,y,z)$: symmetric elliptic integral of second kind, $\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$ (= $\mathrm{\wp }\left(z|𝕃\right)$ = $\mathrm{\wp }(z;g_2,g_3)$): Weierstrass $\mathrm{\wp }$-function, $e_j$: Weierstrass lattice roots, $\zeta \left(z\right)$ (= $\zeta \left(z|𝕃\right)$ = $\zeta (z;g_2,g_3)$): Weierstrass zeta function and $z$: complex number

Referenced by:

§19.25(vi), Erratum (V1.0.18) for Equation (19.25.37), Erratum (V1.1.0) for Subsection 19.25(vi)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.25.E37

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Correction (effective with 1.1.0):

This equation has been corrected, namely the left-hand side which was originally $\zeta \left(z\right)+z\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$, has been replaced by $\zeta \left(z+2\omega \right)+(z+2\omega )\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$, and the right-hand side has been multiplied by $\pm 1$.

Clarification (effective with 1.0.18):

The Weierstrass zeta function in this equation incorrectly linked to the definition of the Riemann zeta function. However, to the eye, the functions appeared correct.

See also:

Annotations for §19.25(vi), §19.25 and Ch.19

… ►

19.25.40 $$z+2\omega =\pm \sigma \left(z\right)R_F({\sigma }_1^2(z),{\sigma }_2^2(z),{\sigma }_3^2(z)),$$

ⓘ

Symbols:

$R_F(x,y,z)$: symmetric elliptic integral of first kind, $\sigma \left(z\right)$ (= $\sigma \left(z|𝕃\right)$ = $\sigma (z;g_2,g_3)$): Weierstrass sigma function, $z$: complex number and ${\sigma }_j(z)$: function

Proof sketch:

Combine Erdélyi et al. (1953b, §§13.12(22), 13.13(22)), (19.25.35) and (19.16.1).

Referenced by:

§19.25(vi), §19.25(vi), Erratum (V1.1.0) for Subsection 19.25(vi)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/19.25.E40

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Correction (effective with 1.1.0):

This equation has been corrected, namely the left-hand side which was originally $z$, has been replaced by $z+2\omega$ and the right-hand side has been multiplied by $\pm 1$.

See also:

Annotations for §19.25(vi), §19.25 and Ch.19

…