About the Project

reflection formulas for arguments and orders

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

5 matching pages

1: 10.61 Definitions and Basic Properties
§10.61(iii) Reflection Formulas for Arguments
§10.61(iv) Reflection Formulas for Orders
2: 11.9 Lommel Functions
11.9.1 d 2 w d z 2 + 1 z d w d z + ( 1 ν 2 z 2 ) w = z μ 1
11.9.3 s μ , ν ( z ) = z μ + 1 k = 0 ( 1 ) k z 2 k a k + 1 ( μ , ν ) ,
Reflection Formulas
§11.9(iii) Asymptotic Expansion
3: Bibliography F
  • P. Falloon (2001) Theory and Computation of Spheroidal Harmonics with General Arguments. Master’s Thesis, The University of Western Australia, Department of Physics.
  • L. Fox (1960) Tables of Weber Parabolic Cylinder Functions and Other Functions for Large Arguments. National Physical Laboratory Mathematical Tables, Vol. 4. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
  • C. K. Frederickson and P. L. Marston (1992) Transverse cusp diffraction catastrophes produced by the reflection of ultrasonic tone bursts from a curved surface in water. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 92 (5), pp. 2869–2877.
  • C. K. Frederickson and P. L. Marston (1994) Travel time surface of a transverse cusp caustic produced by reflection of acoustical transients from a curved metal surface. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 95 (2), pp. 650–660.
  • C. L. Frenzen (1992) Error bounds for the asymptotic expansion of the ratio of two gamma functions with complex argument. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 23 (2), pp. 505–511.
  • 4: 10.68 Modulus and Phase Functions
    With arguments ( x ) suppressed, …
    §10.68(iii) Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
    10.68.16 M ν ( x ) = e x / 2 ( 2 π x ) 1 2 ( 1 μ 1 8 2 1 x + ( μ 1 ) 2 256 1 x 2 ( μ 1 ) ( μ 2 + 14 μ 399 ) 6144 2 1 x 3 + O ( 1 x 4 ) ) ,
    10.68.17 ln M ν ( x ) = x 2 1 2 ln ( 2 π x ) μ 1 8 2 1 x ( μ 1 ) ( μ 25 ) 384 2 1 x 3 ( μ 1 ) ( μ 13 ) 128 1 x 4 + O ( 1 x 5 ) ,
    10.68.18 θ ν ( x ) = x 2 + ( 1 2 ν 1 8 ) π + μ 1 8 2 1 x + μ 1 16 1 x 2 ( μ 1 ) ( μ 25 ) 384 2 1 x 3 + O ( 1 x 5 ) .
    5: Errata
  • Chapter 1 Additions

    The following additions were made in Chapter 1:

  • Section 1.13

    In Equation (1.13.4), the determinant form of the two-argument Wronskian

    1.13.4 𝒲 { w 1 ( z ) , w 2 ( z ) } = det [ w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) ] = w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 1 ( z )

    was added as an equality. In ¶Wronskian (in §1.13(i)), immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added indicating that in general the n -argument Wronskian is given by 𝒲 { w 1 ( z ) , , w n ( z ) } = det [ w k ( j 1 ) ( z ) ] , where 1 j , k n . Immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added giving the definition of the n -argument Wronskian. It is explained just above (1.13.5) that this equation is often referred to as Abel’s identity. Immediately below Equation (1.13.5), a sentence was added explaining how it generalizes for n th-order differential equations. A reference to Ince (1926, §5.2) was added.

  • Chapter 35 Functions of Matrix Argument

    The generalized hypergeometric function of matrix argument F q p ( a 1 , , a p ; b 1 , , b q ; 𝐓 ) , was linked inadvertently as its single variable counterpart F q p ( a 1 , , a p ; b 1 , , b q ; 𝐓 ) . Furthermore, the Jacobi function of matrix argument P ν ( γ , δ ) ( 𝐓 ) , and the Laguerre function of matrix argument L ν ( γ ) ( 𝐓 ) , were also linked inadvertently (and incorrectly) in terms of the single variable counterparts given by P ν ( γ , δ ) ( 𝐓 ) , and L ν ( γ ) ( 𝐓 ) . In order to resolve these inconsistencies, these functions now link correctly to their respective definitions.

  • Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions

    A number of additions and changes have been made to the metadata to reflect new and changed references as well as to how some equations have been derived.

  • References

    An addition was made to the Software Index to reflect a multiple precision (MP) package written in C++ which uses a variety of different MP interfaces. See Kormanyos (2011).