About the Project

Jacobi%20theta%20functions

AdvancedHelp

(0.006 seconds)

1—10 of 12 matching pages

1: 20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
§20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
§20.11(ii) Ramanujan’s Theta Function and q -Series
§20.11(iv) Theta Functions with Characteristics
For m = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , and m n , define twelve combined theta functions φ m , n ( z , q ) by …
2: 20.7 Identities
20.7.34 θ 1 ( z , q 2 ) θ 3 ( z , q 2 ) θ 1 ( z , i q ) = θ 2 ( z , q 2 ) θ 4 ( z , q 2 ) θ 2 ( z , i q ) = i 1 / 4 θ 2 ( 0 , q 2 ) θ 4 ( 0 , q 2 ) 2 .
3: 20.10 Integrals
§20.10 Integrals
§20.10(i) Mellin Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
§20.10(ii) Laplace Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
For corresponding results for argument derivatives of the theta functions see Erdélyi et al. (1954a, pp. 224–225) or Oberhettinger and Badii (1973, p. 193). … For further integrals of theta functions see Erdélyi et al. (1954a, pp. 61–62 and 339), Prudnikov et al. (1990, pp. 356–358), Prudnikov et al. (1992a, §3.41), and Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, pp. 627–628).
4: Bibliography B
  • W. N. Bailey (1938) The generating function of Jacobi polynomials. J. London Math. Soc. 13, pp. 8–12.
  • A. Bañuelos and R. A. Depine (1980) A program for computing the Riemann zeta function for complex argument. Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 441–445.
  • K. L. Bell and N. S. Scott (1980) Coulomb functions (negative energies). Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 447–458.
  • W. G. Bickley and J. Nayler (1935) A short table of the functions Ki n ( x ) , from n = 1 to n = 16 . Phil. Mag. Series 7 20, pp. 343–347.
  • S. Bochner (1952) Bessel functions and modular relations of higher type and hyperbolic differential equations. Comm. Sém. Math. Univ. Lund [Medd. Lunds Univ. Mat. Sem.] 1952 (Tome Supplementaire), pp. 12–20.
  • 5: Bibliography M
  • Fr. Mechel (1966) Calculation of the modified Bessel functions of the second kind with complex argument. Math. Comp. 20 (95), pp. 407–412.
  • S. C. Milne (2002) Infinite families of exact sums of squares formulas, Jacobi elliptic functions, continued fractions, and Schur functions. Ramanujan J. 6 (1), pp. 7–149.
  • S. C. Milne (1996) New infinite families of exact sums of squares formulas, Jacobi elliptic functions, and Ramanujan’s tau function. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (26), pp. 15004–15008.
  • D. S. Moak (1981) The q -analogue of the Laguerre polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 81 (1), pp. 20–47.
  • D. Mumford (1984) Tata Lectures on Theta. II. Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA.
  • 6: Bibliography R
  • H. Rademacher (1938) On the partition function p(n). Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 43 (4), pp. 241–254.
  • M. Rahman (1981) A non-negative representation of the linearization coefficients of the product of Jacobi polynomials. Canad. J. Math. 33 (4), pp. 915–928.
  • H. E. Rauch and A. Lebowitz (1973) Elliptic Functions, Theta Functions, and Riemann Surfaces. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD.
  • J. Raynal (1979) On the definition and properties of generalized 6 - j  symbols. J. Math. Phys. 20 (12), pp. 2398–2415.
  • R. Reynolds and A. Stauffer (2021) Infinite Sum of the Incomplete Gamma Function Expressed in Terms of the Hurwitz Zeta Function. Mathematics 9 (16).
  • 7: Bibliography I
  • J. Igusa (1972) Theta Functions. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • E. L. Ince (1932) Tables of the elliptic cylinder functions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 52, pp. 355–433.
  • K. Inkeri (1959) The real roots of Bernoulli polynomials. Ann. Univ. Turku. Ser. A I 37, pp. 1–20.
  • M. E. H. Ismail and D. R. Masson (1991) Two families of orthogonal polynomials related to Jacobi polynomials. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 21 (1), pp. 359–375.
  • M. E. H. Ismail (1986) Asymptotics of the Askey-Wilson and q -Jacobi polynomials. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17 (6), pp. 1475–1482.
  • 8: 18.5 Explicit Representations
    With x = cos θ = 1 2 ( z + z 1 ) , …
    §18.5(iii) Finite Power Series, the Hypergeometric Function, and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
    Jacobi
    The first of each of equations (18.5.7) and (18.5.8) can be regarded as definitions of P n ( α , β ) ( x ) when the conditions α > 1 and β > 1 are not satisfied. …For this reason, and also in the interest of simplicity, in the case of the Jacobi polynomials P n ( α , β ) ( x ) we assume throughout this chapter that α > 1 and β > 1 , unless stated otherwise. …
    9: Bibliography D
  • B. Deconinck, M. Heil, A. Bobenko, M. van Hoeij, and M. Schmies (2004) Computing Riemann theta functions. Math. Comp. 73 (247), pp. 1417–1442.
  • B. Döring (1966) Complex zeros of cylinder functions. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 215–222.
  • T. M. Dunster (1989) Uniform asymptotic expansions for Whittaker’s confluent hypergeometric functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (3), pp. 744–760.
  • T. M. Dunster (1999) Asymptotic approximations for the Jacobi and ultraspherical polynomials, and related functions. Methods Appl. Anal. 6 (3), pp. 21–56.
  • L. Durand (1978) Product formulas and Nicholson-type integrals for Jacobi functions. I. Summary of results. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (1), pp. 76–86.
  • 10: Errata
  • Figure 20.3.1
    See accompanying text

    Figure 20.3.1 θ j ( π x , 0.15 ) , 0 x 2 , j = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .

    The locations of the tick marks denoting 1.5 and 2 on the x -axis were corrected.

    Reported 2017-05-22 by Paul Abbott.

  • Equation (22.19.2)
    22.19.2 sin ( 1 2 θ ( t ) ) = sin ( 1 2 α ) sn ( t + K , sin ( 1 2 α ) )

    Originally the first argument to the function sn was given incorrectly as t . The correct argument is t + K .

    Reported 2014-03-05 by Svante Janson.

  • Equation (22.19.3)
    22.19.3 θ ( t ) = 2 am ( t E / 2 , 2 / E )

    Originally the first argument to the function am was given incorrectly as t . The correct argument is t E / 2 .

    Reported 2014-03-05 by Svante Janson.

  • Table 22.4.3

    Originally a minus sign was missing in the entries for cd u and dc u in the second column (headed z + K + i K ). The correct entries are k 1 ns z and k sn z . Note: These entries appear online but not in the published print edition. More specifically, Table 22.4.3 in the published print edition is restricted to the three Jacobian elliptic functions sn , cn , dn , whereas Table 22.4.3 covers all 12 Jacobian elliptic functions.

    u
    z + K z + K + i K z + i K z + 2 K z + 2 K + 2 i K z + 2 i K
    cd u sn z k 1 ns z k 1 dc z cd z cd z cd z
    dc u ns z k sn z k cd z dc z dc z dc z

    Reported 2014-02-28 by Svante Janson.

  • Chapters 8, 20, 36

    Several new equations have been added. See (8.17.24), (20.7.34), §20.11(v), (26.12.27), (36.2.28), and (36.2.29).