About the Project

logarithmic%20integral

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

11—20 of 26 matching pages

11: 22.3 Graphics
The period diverges logarithmically as k 1 ; see §19.12.
See accompanying text
Figure 22.3.13: sn ( x , k ) for k = 1 e n , n = 0 to 20, 5 π x 5 π . Magnify 3D Help
See accompanying text
Figure 22.3.14: cn ( x , k ) for k = 1 e n , n = 0 to 20, 5 π x 5 π . Magnify 3D Help
See accompanying text
Figure 22.3.15: dn ( x , k ) for k = 1 e n , n = 0 to 20, 5 π x 5 π . Magnify 3D Help
See accompanying text
Figure 22.3.28: Density plot of | sn ( 20 , k ) | as a function of complex k 2 , 10 ( k 2 ) 20 , 10 ( k 2 ) 10 . … Magnify
12: 7.23 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 7) includes erf x , ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , x [ 0 , 2 ] , 10D; ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , x [ 2 , 10 ] , 8S; x e x 2 erfc x , x 2 [ 0 , 0.25 ] , 7D; 2 n Γ ( 1 2 n + 1 ) i n erfc ( x ) , n = 1 ( 1 ) 6 , 10 , 11 , x [ 0 , 5 ] , 6S; F ( x ) , x [ 0 , 2 ] , 10D; x F ( x ) , x 2 [ 0 , 0.25 ] , 9D; C ( x ) , S ( x ) , x [ 0 , 5 ] , 7D; f ( x ) , g ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] , x 1 [ 0 , 1 ] , 15D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Table 27.6) includes the Goodwin–Staton integral G ( x ) , x = 1 ( .1 ) 3 ( .5 ) 8 , 4D; also G ( x ) + ln x , x = 0 ( .05 ) 1 , 4D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 637, 639) includes ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , erf x , x = 0 ( .02 ) 1 ( .04 ) 3 , 8D; C ( x ) , S ( x ) , x = 0 ( .2 ) 10 ( 2 ) 100 ( 100 ) 500 , 8D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 638, 640–641) includes the real and imaginary parts of erf z , x [ 0 , 5 ] , y = 0.5 ( .5 ) 3 , 7D and 8D, respectively; the real and imaginary parts of x e ± i t 2 d t , ( 1 / π ) e i ( x 2 + ( π / 4 ) ) x e ± i t 2 d t , x = 0 ( .5 ) 20 ( 1 ) 25 , 8D, together with the corresponding modulus and phase to 8D and 6D (degrees), respectively.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 642) includes the first 10 zeros of erf z , 9D; the first 25 distinct zeros of C ( z ) and S ( z ) , 8S.

  • 13: 10.75 Tables
  • The main tables in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 9) give J 0 ( x ) to 15D, J 1 ( x ) , J 2 ( x ) , Y 0 ( x ) , Y 1 ( x ) to 10D, Y 2 ( x ) to 8D, x = 0 ( .1 ) 17.5 ; Y n ( x ) ( 2 / π ) J n ( x ) ln x , n = 0 , 1 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 2 , 8D; J n ( x ) , Y n ( x ) , n = 3 ( 1 ) 9 , x = 0 ( .2 ) 20 , 5D or 5S; J n ( x ) , Y n ( x ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 ( 10 ) 50 , 100 , x = 1 , 2 , 5 , 10 , 50 , 100 , 10S; modulus and phase functions x M n ( x ) , θ n ( x ) x , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 1 / x = 0 ( .01 ) 0.1 , 8D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 270) tabulates 0 x J 0 ( t ) d t , 0 x t 1 ( 1 J 0 ( t ) ) d t , 0 x Y 0 ( t ) d t , x t 1 Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 ( .5 ) 20 , 8D.

  • Bickley et al. (1952) tabulates x n I n ( x ) or e x I n ( x ) , x n K n ( x ) or e x K n ( x ) , n = 2 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 (.01 or .1) 10(.1) 20, 8S; I n ( x ) , K n ( x ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 or 0.1 ( .1 ) 20 , 10S.

  • The main tables in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 9) give e x I n ( x ) , e x K n ( x ) , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ( .2 ) 20 , 8D–10D or 10S; x e x I n ( x ) , ( x / π ) e x K n ( x ) , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 1 / x = 0 ( .002 ) 0.05 ; K 0 ( x ) + I 0 ( x ) ln x , x ( K 1 ( x ) I 1 ( x ) ln x ) , x = 0 ( .1 ) 2 , 8D; e x I n ( x ) , e x K n ( x ) , n = 3 ( 1 ) 9 , x = 0 ( .2 ) 10 ( .5 ) 20 , 5S; I n ( x ) , K n ( x ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 ( 10 ) 50 , 100 , x = 1 , 2 , 5 , 10 , 50 , 100 , 9–10S.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 271) tabulates e x 0 x I 0 ( t ) d t , e x 0 x t 1 ( I 0 ( t ) 1 ) d t , e x x K 0 ( t ) d t , x e x x t 1 K 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 ( .5 ) 20 , 8D.

  • 14: 3.4 Differentiation
    If f can be extended analytically into the complex plane, then from Cauchy’s integral formula (§1.9(iii)) …The integral on the right-hand side can be approximated by the composite trapezoidal rule (3.5.2). … The integral (3.4.18) becomes …With the choice r = k (which is crucial when k is large because of numerical cancellation) the integrand equals e k at the dominant points θ = 0 , 2 π , and in combination with the factor k k in front of the integral sign this gives a rough approximation to 1 / k ! . …As explained in §§3.5(i) and 3.5(ix) the composite trapezoidal rule can be very efficient for computing integrals with analytic periodic integrands. …
    15: 12.10 Uniform Asymptotic Expansions for Large Parameter
    12.10.7 ξ = 1 2 t t 2 1 1 2 ln ( t + t 2 1 ) .
    12.10.15 h ( μ ) = 2 1 4 μ 2 1 4 e 1 4 μ 2 μ 1 2 μ 2 1 2 ,
    12.10.26 ξ ¯ = 1 2 t t 2 + 1 + 1 2 ln ( t + t 2 + 1 ) ,
    12.10.33 𝖠 s + 1 ( τ ) = 4 τ 2 ( τ + 1 ) 2 d d τ 𝖠 s ( τ ) 1 4 0 τ ( 20 u 2 + 20 u + 3 ) 𝖠 s ( u ) d u , s = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
    𝖠 1 ( τ ) = 1 12 τ ( 20 τ 2 + 30 τ + 9 ) ,
    16: Bibliography K
  • D. Karp and S. M. Sitnik (2007) Asymptotic approximations for the first incomplete elliptic integral near logarithmic singularity. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 205 (1), pp. 186–206.
  • R. B. Kearfott, M. Dawande, K. Du, and C. Hu (1994) Algorithm 737: INTLIB: A portable Fortran 77 interval standard-function library. ACM Trans. Math. Software 20 (4), pp. 447–459.
  • M. K. Kerimov (1980) Methods of computing the Riemann zeta-function and some generalizations of it. USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 20 (6), pp. 212–230.
  • A. V. Kitaev and A. H. Vartanian (2004) Connection formulae for asymptotics of solutions of the degenerate third Painlevé equation. I. Inverse Problems 20 (4), pp. 1165–1206.
  • T. H. Koornwinder (2009) The Askey scheme as a four-manifold with corners. Ramanujan J. 20 (3), pp. 409–439.
  • 17: 11.6 Asymptotic Expansions
    11.6.3 0 z 𝐊 0 ( t ) d t 2 π ( ln ( 2 z ) + γ ) 2 π k = 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 k 1 ) ! ( k ! ) 2 ( 2 z ) 2 k , | ph z | π δ ,
    11.6.4 0 z 𝐌 0 ( t ) d t + 2 π ( ln ( 2 z ) + γ ) 2 π k = 1 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 k 1 ) ! ( k ! ) 2 ( 2 z ) 2 k , | ph z | 1 2 π δ ,
    c 3 ( λ ) = 20 λ 6 4 λ 4 ,
    18: Bibliography
  • M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur (1977) Exact linearization of a Painlevé transcendent. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (20), pp. 1103–1106.
  • A. Abramov (1960) Tables of ln Γ ( z ) for Complex Argument. Pergamon Press, New York.
  • A. Adelberg (1992) On the degrees of irreducible factors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials. Acta Arith. 62 (4), pp. 329–342.
  • S. V. Aksenov, M. A. Savageau, U. D. Jentschura, J. Becher, G. Soff, and P. J. Mohr (2003) Application of the combined nonlinear-condensation transformation to problems in statistical analysis and theoretical physics. Comput. Phys. Comm. 150 (1), pp. 1–20.
  • D. E. Amos (1989) Repeated integrals and derivatives of K Bessel functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (1), pp. 169–175.
  • 19: 9.18 Tables
  • Miller (1946) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) for x = 20 ( .01 ) 2 ; log 10 Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) / Ai ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 25 ( 1 ) 75 ; Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 10 ( .1 ) 2.5 ; log 10 Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) / Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ; M ( x ) , N ( x ) , θ ( x ) , ϕ ( x ) (respectively F ( x ) , G ( x ) , χ ( x ) , ψ ( x ) ) for x = 80 ( 1 ) 30 ( .1 ) 0 . Precision is generally 8D; slightly less for some of the auxiliary functions. Extracts from these tables are included in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10), together with some auxiliary functions for large arguments.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 337) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) , Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( 1 ) 20 to 8S and for x = 20 ( 1 ) 0 to 9D.

  • Miller (1946) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; b k , Bi ( b k ) , b k , Bi ( b k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 . Precision is 8D. Entries for k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 are reproduced in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10).

  • Sherry (1959) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; 20S.

  • §9.18(v) Integrals
    20: 25.6 Integer Arguments
    25.6.3 ζ ( n ) = B n + 1 n + 1 , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .
    25.6.7 ζ ( 2 ) = 0 1 0 1 1 1 x y d x d y .
    25.6.11 ζ ( 0 ) = 1 2 ln ( 2 π ) .
    25.6.12 ζ ′′ ( 0 ) = 1 2 ( ln ( 2 π ) ) 2 + 1 2 γ 2 1 24 π 2 + γ 1 ,
    25.6.15 ζ ( 2 n ) = ( 1 ) n + 1 ( 2 π ) 2 n 2 ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 n ζ ( 1 2 n ) ( ψ ( 2 n ) ln ( 2 π ) ) B 2 n ) .