About the Project

removable discontinuity

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

31—40 of 52 matching pages

31: 25.2 Definition and Expansions
25.2.4 ζ ( s ) = 1 s 1 + n = 0 ( 1 ) n n ! γ n ( s 1 ) n ,
32: Errata
  • Subsection 14.3(iv)

    A sentence was added at the end of this subsection indicating that from (15.9.15), it follows that 1 2 μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , and ν + μ + 1 = 0 , 1 , 2 , are removable singularities.

  • Equation (5.11.14)

    The previous constraint ( b a ) > 0 was removed, see Fields (1966, (3)).

  • Section 36.1 Special Notation

    The entry for to represent complex conjugation was removed (see Version 1.0.19).

  • Equation (25.2.4)

    The original constraint, s > 0 , was removed because, as stated after (25.2.1), ζ ( s ) is meromorphic with a simple pole at s = 1 , and therefore ζ ( s ) ( s 1 ) 1 is an entire function.

    Suggested by John Harper.

  • References

    Bibliographic citations and clarifications have been added, removed, or modified in §§5.6(i), 5.10, 7.8, 7.25(iii), and 32.16.

  • 33: 1.18 Linear Second Order Differential Operators and Eigenfunction Expansions
    Often circumstances allow rather stronger statements, such as uniform convergence, or pointwise convergence at points where f ( x ) is continuous, with convergence to ( f ( x 0 ) + f ( x 0 + ) ) / 2 if x 0 is an isolated point of discontinuity. … This is the discontinuity across the branch cut in (1.18.52) 𝝈 c , from z below to above the cut, divided by 2 π i . … This representation has poles with residues | f ^ ( λ n ) | 2 at the discrete eigenvalues and a branch cut along [ 0 , ) with discontinuity, from below to above the cut, 2 π i | f ^ ( λ ) | 2 , as in (1.18.53), see Newton (2002, §7.1.1). …
    34: 14.3 Definitions and Hypergeometric Representations
    From (15.9.15) it follows that 1 2 μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , and ν + μ + 1 = 0 , 1 , 2 , are removable singularities of the right-hand sides of (14.3.21) and (14.3.22).
    35: 19.29 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
    If both square roots in (19.29.22) are 0, then the indeterminacy in the two preceding equations can be removed by using (19.27.8) to evaluate the integral as R G ( a 1 b 2 , a 2 b 1 , 0 ) multiplied either by 2 / ( b 1 b 2 ) or by 2 / ( a 1 a 2 ) in the cases of (19.29.20) or (19.29.21), respectively. …
    36: 18.3 Definitions
    37: 19.21 Connection Formulas
    19.21.10 2 R G ( x , y , z ) = z R F ( x , y , z ) 1 3 ( x z ) ( y z ) R D ( x , y , z ) + x 1 / 2 y 1 / 2 z 1 / 2 , z 0 .
    38: 21.7 Riemann Surfaces
    Removing the singularities of this curve gives rise to a two-dimensional connected manifold with a complex-analytic structure, that is, a Riemann surface. All compact Riemann surfaces can be obtained this way.
    39: 33.14 Definitions and Basic Properties
    40: Bibliography B
  • M. V. Berry (1989) Uniform asymptotic smoothing of Stokes’s discontinuities. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 422, pp. 7–21.