About the Project
NIST

quadratic equations

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—15 of 15 matching pages

11: 32.7 Bäcklund Transformations
§32.7(ii) Second Painlevé Equation
§32.7(iii) Third Painlevé Equation
P VI  also has quadratic and quartic transformations. …The quadratic transformation … …
12: 19.22 Quadratic Transformations
§19.22 Quadratic Transformations
As n , p n and ε n converge quadratically to M ( a 0 , g 0 ) and 0, respectively, and Q n converges to 0 faster than quadratically. … The equations inverse to (19.22.5) and (19.22.16) are given by …and the corresponding equations with z , z + , and z - replaced by p , p + , and p - , respectively. …
13: Bibliography
  • A. S. Abdullaev (1985) Asymptotics of solutions of the generalized sine-Gordon equation, the third Painlevé equation and the d’Alembert equation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 280 (2), pp. 265–268 (Russian).
  • V. È. Adler (1994) Nonlinear chains and Painlevé equations. Phys. D 73 (4), pp. 335–351.
  • F. M. Arscott (1967) The Whittaker-Hill equation and the wave equation in paraboloidal co-ordinates. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 67, pp. 265–276.
  • U. M. Ascher and L. R. Petzold (1998) Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential-Algebraic Equations. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA.
  • M. J. Atia, A. Martínez-Finkelshtein, P. Martínez-González, and F. Thabet (2014) Quadratic differentials and asymptotics of Laguerre polynomials with varying complex parameters. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 416 (1), pp. 52–80.
  • 14: 31.7 Relations to Other Functions
    They are analogous to quadratic and cubic hypergeometric transformations (§§15.8(iii)15.8(v)). … equation (31.2.1) becomes Lamé’s equation with independent variable ζ ; compare (29.2.1) and (31.2.8). The solutions (31.3.1) and (31.3.5) transform into even and odd solutions of Lamé’s equation, respectively. …
    15: 19.29 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
    If both square roots in (19.29.22) are 0, then the indeterminacy in the two preceding equations can be removed by using (19.27.8) to evaluate the integral as R G ( a 1 b 2 , a 2 b 1 , 0 ) multiplied either by - 2 / ( b 1 b 2 ) or by - 2 / ( a 1 a 2 ) in the cases of (19.29.20) or (19.29.21), respectively. …