The six Painlevé equations – are as follows:
32.2.1 | |||
32.2.2 | |||
32.2.3 | |||
32.2.4 | |||
32.2.5 | |||
32.2.6 | |||
with , , , and arbitrary constants. The solutions of – are called the Painlevé transcendents. The six equations are sometimes referred to as the Painlevé transcendents, but in this chapter this term will be used only for their solutions.
Let
32.2.7 | |||
be a nonlinear second-order differential equation in which is a rational function of and , and is locally analytic in , that is, analytic except for isolated singularities in . In general the singularities of the solutions are movable in the sense that their location depends on the constants of integration associated with the initial or boundary conditions. An equation is said to have the Painlevé property if all its solutions are free from movable branch points; the solutions may have movable poles or movable isolated essential singularities (§1.10(iii)), however.
There are fifty equations with the Painlevé property. They are distinct modulo Möbius (bilinear) transformations
32.2.8 | ||||
in which , , , , and are locally analytic functions. The fifty equations can be reduced to linear equations, solved in terms of elliptic functions (Chapters 22 and 23), or reduced to one of –.
For arbitrary values of the parameters , , , and , the general solutions of – are transcendental, that is, they cannot be expressed in closed-form elementary functions. However, for special values of the parameters, equations – have special solutions in terms of elementary functions, or special functions defined elsewhere in the DLMF.
If in , then set and , without loss of generality, by rescaling and if necessary. If and in , then set and , without loss of generality. Lastly, if and , then set and , without loss of generality.
If in , then set , without loss of generality.
In , if with , then
32.2.9 | |||
which is known as .
In , if , , and , then
32.2.10 | |||
In , if with and , then
32.2.11 | |||
When this is a nonlinear harmonic oscillator.
In , if with , then
32.2.12 | |||
Let
32.2.15 | ||||
where , , are constants, , , are functions of , with
32.2.16 | |||
32.2.17 | |||
Then satisfies with
32.2.18 | |||
See Noumi and Yamada (1998).
Next, let
32.2.19 | ||||
where , , , are constants, , , , are functions of , with
32.2.20 | |||
32.2.21 | |||
32.2.22 | |||
Then satisfies with
32.2.23 | |||
– are obtained from by a coalescence cascade:
32.2.24 | |||
For example, if in
32.2.25 | |||
32.2.26 | ||||
then
32.2.27 | |||
thus in the limit as , satisfies with .
If in
32.2.28 | |||
32.2.29 | ||||
then as , satisfies with , .
If in
32.2.30 | |||
32.2.31 | ||||
then as , satisfies with , .
If in
32.2.32 | |||
32.2.33 | ||||
then as , satisfies with , , , , .
If in
32.2.34 | |||
32.2.35 | ||||
then as , satisfies with , , .
Lastly, if in
32.2.36 | |||
32.2.37 | ||||
then as , satisfies with , , , , .