About the Project

hyperbolic cosecant function

AdvancedHelp

(0.006 seconds)

21—30 of 32 matching pages

21: 19.11 Addition Theorems
γ = ( ( csc 2 θ ) α 2 ) ( ( csc 2 ϕ ) α 2 ) ( ( csc 2 ψ ) α 2 ) ,
19.11.6_5 R C ( γ δ , γ ) = 1 δ arctan ( δ sin θ sin ϕ sin ψ α 2 1 α 2 cos θ cos ϕ cos ψ ) .
Hence, care has to be taken with the multivalued functions in (19.11.5). …
γ = ( 1 α 2 ) ( ( csc 2 θ ) α 2 ) ( ( csc 2 ϕ ) α 2 ) ,
γ = ( ( csc 2 θ ) α 2 ) 2 ( ( csc 2 ψ ) α 2 ) ,
22: 19.6 Special Cases
For the inverse Gudermannian function gd 1 ( ϕ ) see §4.23(viii). … Circular and hyperbolic cases, including Cauchy principal values, are unified by using R C ( x , y ) . Let c = csc 2 ϕ α 2 and Δ = 1 k 2 sin 2 ϕ . …
§19.6(v) R C ( x , y )
23: 4.15 Graphics
§4.15(i) Real Arguments
§4.15(iii) Complex Arguments: Surfaces
In the graphics shown in this subsection height corresponds to the absolute value of the function and color to the phase. … The corresponding surfaces for arccos ( x + i y ) , arccot ( x + i y ) , arcsec ( x + i y ) can be visualized from Figures 4.15.9, 4.15.11, 4.15.13 with the aid of equations (4.23.16)–(4.23.18).
24: 1.14 Integral Transforms
The Fourier transform of a real- or complex-valued function f ( t ) is defined by … Suppose f ( t ) is a real- or complex-valued function and s is a real or complex parameter. …
Periodic Functions
The Mellin transform of a real- or complex-valued function f ( x ) is defined by … The Stieltjes transform of a real-valued function f ( t ) is defined by …
25: 19.8 Quadratic Transformations
19.8.4 1 M ( a 0 , g 0 ) = 2 π 0 π / 2 d θ a 0 2 cos 2 θ + g 0 2 sin 2 θ = 1 π 0 d t t ( t + a 0 2 ) ( t + g 0 2 ) .
c 1 = csc 2 ϕ 1 .
c = csc 2 ϕ .
26: 19.16 Definitions
§19.16(ii) R a ( 𝐛 ; 𝐳 )
The R -function is often used to make a unified statement of a property of several elliptic integrals. …where B ( x , y ) is the beta function5.12) and … For generalizations and further information, especially representation of the R -function as a Dirichlet average, see Carlson (1977b). …
27: 11.5 Integral Representations
§11.5(i) Integrals Along the Real Line
§11.5(ii) Contour Integrals
Mellin–Barnes Integrals
11.5.8 ( 1 2 x ) ν 1 𝐇 ν ( x ) = 1 2 π i i i π csc ( π s ) Γ ( 3 2 + s ) Γ ( 3 2 + ν + s ) ( 1 4 x 2 ) s d s , x > 0 , ν > 1 ,
§11.5(iii) Compendia
28: 10.22 Integrals
§10.22(i) Indefinite Integrals
Products
Orthogonality
Orthogonality
The Hankel transform (or Bessel transform) of a function f ( x ) is defined as …
29: 22.11 Fourier and Hyperbolic Series
§22.11 Fourier and Hyperbolic Series
22.11.7 ns ( z , k ) π 2 K csc ζ = 2 π K n = 0 q 2 n + 1 sin ( ( 2 n + 1 ) ζ ) 1 q 2 n + 1 ,
In (22.11.7)–(22.11.12) the left-hand sides are replaced by their limiting values at the poles of the Jacobian functions. … A related hyperbolic series is …
30: Errata
  • Equation (10.22.72)
    10.22.72 0 J μ ( a t ) J ν ( b t ) J ν ( c t ) t 1 μ d t = ( b c ) μ 1 sin ( ( μ ν ) π ) ( sinh χ ) μ 1 2 ( 1 2 π 3 ) 1 2 a μ e ( μ 1 2 ) i π Q ν 1 2 1 2 μ ( cosh χ ) , μ > 1 2 , ν > 1 , a > b + c , cosh χ = ( a 2 b 2 c 2 ) / ( 2 b c )

    Originally, the factor on the right-hand side was written as ( b c ) μ 1 cos ( ν π ) ( sinh χ ) μ 1 2 ( 1 2 π 3 ) 1 2 a μ , which was taken directly from Watson (1944, p. 412, (13.46.5)), who uses a different normalization for the associated Legendre function of the second kind Q ν μ . Watson’s Q ν μ equals sin ( ( ν + μ ) π ) sin ( ν π ) e μ π i Q ν μ in the DLMF.

    Reported by Arun Ravishankar on 2018-10-22

  • Figures 36.3.9, 36.3.10, 36.3.11, 36.3.12

    Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.9: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.10: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.11: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.12: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) | .

    Reported 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi.

  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • Section 4.43

    The first paragraph has been rewritten to correct reported errors. The new version is reproduced here.

    Let p ( 0 ) and q be real constants and

    4.43.1
    A = ( 4 3 p ) 1 / 2 ,
    B = ( 4 3 p ) 1 / 2 .

    The roots of

    4.43.2 z 3 + p z + q = 0

    are:

    1. (a)

      A sin a , A sin ( a + 2 3 π ) , and A sin ( a + 4 3 π ) , with sin ( 3 a ) = 4 q / A 3 , when 4 p 3 + 27 q 2 0 .

    2. (b)

      A cosh a , A cosh ( a + 2 3 π i ) , and A cosh ( a + 4 3 π i ) , with cosh ( 3 a ) = 4 q / A 3 , when p < 0 , q < 0 , and 4 p 3 + 27 q 2 > 0 .

    3. (c)

      B sinh a , B sinh ( a + 2 3 π i ) , and B sinh ( a + 4 3 π i ) , with sinh ( 3 a ) = 4 q / B 3 , when p > 0 .

    Note that in Case (a) all the roots are real, whereas in Cases (b) and (c) there is one real root and a conjugate pair of complex roots. See also §1.11(iii).

    Reported 2014-10-31 by Masataka Urago.

  • Table 22.5.4

    Originally the limiting form for sc ( z , k ) in the last line of this table was incorrect ( cosh z , instead of sinh z ).

    sn ( z , k ) tanh z cd ( z , k ) 1 dc ( z , k ) 1 ns ( z , k ) coth z
    cn ( z , k ) sech z sd ( z , k ) sinh z nc ( z , k ) cosh z ds ( z , k ) csch z
    dn ( z , k ) sech z nd ( z , k ) cosh z sc ( z , k ) sinh z cs ( z , k ) csch z

    Reported 2010-11-23.