About the Project

finite sum of 3j symbols

AdvancedHelp

(0.008 seconds)

11—20 of 23 matching pages

11: Errata
  • Chapters 10 Bessel Functions, 18 Orthogonal Polynomials, 34 3j, 6j, 9j Symbols

    The Legendre polynomial P n was mistakenly identified as the associated Legendre function P n in §§10.54, 10.59, 10.60, 18.18, 18.41, 34.3 (and was thus also affected by the bug reported below). These symbols now link correctly to their definitions. Reported by Roy Hughes on 2022-05-23

  • Section 34.1

    The relation between Clebsch-Gordan and 3 j symbols was clarified, and the sign of m 3 was changed for readability. The reference Condon and Shortley (1935) for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959) and the references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise in §34.1.

  • Section 34.1

    The reference for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Condon and Shortley (1935), was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959). The references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise.

  • Equation (34.7.4)
    34.7.4 ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = m r 1 , m r 2 , r = 1 , 2 , 3 ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 )

    Originally the third 3 j symbol in the summation was written incorrectly as ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) .

    Reported 2015-01-19 by Yan-Rui Liu.

  • Equation (34.3.7)
    34.3.7 ( j 1 j 2 j 3 j 1 j 1 m 3 m 3 ) = ( 1 ) j 1 j 2 m 3 ( ( 2 j 1 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + m 3 ) ! ( j 3 m 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + j 3 + 1 ) ! ( j 1 j 2 + j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 m 3 ) ! ( j 3 + m 3 ) ! ) 1 2

    In the original equation the prefactor of the above 3j symbol read ( 1 ) j 2 + j 3 + m 3 . It is now replaced by its correct value ( 1 ) j 1 j 2 m 3 .

    Reported 2014-06-12 by James Zibin.

  • 12: Bibliography F
  • J. L. Fields and Y. L. Luke (1963a) Asymptotic expansions of a class of hypergeometric polynomials with respect to the order. II. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (3), pp. 440–451.
  • J. L. Fields and Y. L. Luke (1963b) Asymptotic expansions of a class of hypergeometric polynomials with respect to the order. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 6 (3), pp. 394–403.
  • J. L. Fields (1965) Asymptotic expansions of a class of hypergeometric polynomials with respect to the order. III. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 12 (3), pp. 593–601.
  • J. P. M. Flude (1998) The Edmonds asymptotic formulas for the 3 j and 6 j symbols. J. Math. Phys. 39 (7), pp. 3906–3915.
  • T. Fort (1948) Finite Differences and Difference Equations in the Real Domain. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • 13: 1.9 Calculus of a Complex Variable
    A domain D , say, is an open set in that is connected, that is, any two points can be joined by a polygonal arc (a finite chain of straight-line segments) lying in the set. … When a n z n and b n z n both converge … If a double series is absolutely convergent, then it is also convergent and its sum is given by either of the repeated sumsfor any finite contour C in D . … Let ( a , b ) be a finite or infinite interval, and f 0 ( t ) , f 1 ( t ) , be real or complex continuous functions, t ( a , b ) . …
    14: Bibliography W
  • R. S. Ward (1987) The Nahm equations, finite-gap potentials and Lamé functions. J. Phys. A 20 (10), pp. 2679–2683.
  • J. K. G. Watson (1999) Asymptotic approximations for certain 6 - j and 9 - j symbols. J. Phys. A 32 (39), pp. 6901–6902.
  • J. V. Wehausen and E. V. Laitone (1960) Surface Waves. In Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 9, Part 3, pp. 446–778.
  • E. J. Weniger (1996) Computation of the Whittaker function of the second kind by summing its divergent asymptotic series with the help of nonlinear sequence transformations. Computers in Physics 10 (5), pp. 496–503.
  • J. A. Wilson (1991) Asymptotics for the F 3 4 polynomials. J. Approx. Theory 66 (1), pp. 58–71.
  • 15: 3.7 Ordinary Differential Equations
    Assume that we wish to integrate (3.7.1) along a finite path 𝒫 from z = a to z = b in a domain D . … Then for s = 2 , 3 , , … Write τ j = z j + 1 z j , j = 0 , 1 , , P , expand w ( z ) and w ( z ) in Taylor series (§1.10(i)) centered at z = z j , and apply (3.7.2). … This is a set of 2 P equations for the 2 P + 2 unknowns, w ( z j ) and w ( z j ) , j = 0 , 1 , , P . … Let ( a , b ) be a finite or infinite interval and q ( x ) be a real-valued continuous (or piecewise continuous) function on the closure of ( a , b ) . …
    16: 18.38 Mathematical Applications
    3 j and 6 j Symbols
    The 3 j symbol (34.2.6), with an alternative expression as a terminating F 2 3 of unit argument, can be expressed in terms of Hahn polynomials (18.20.5) or, by (18.21.1), dual Hahn polynomials. The orthogonality relations in §34.3(iv) for the 3 j symbols can be rewritten in terms of orthogonality relations for Hahn or dual Hahn polynomials as given by §§18.2(i), 18.2(iii) and Table 18.19.1 or by §18.25(iii), respectively. … …
    17: 25.11 Hurwitz Zeta Function
    See accompanying text
    Figure 25.11.1: Hurwitz zeta function ζ ( x , a ) , a = 0. 3, 0. … Magnify
    where h , k are integers with 1 h k and n = 1 , 2 , 3 , . …
    25.11.36Removed because it is just (25.15.1) combined with (25.15.3).
    §25.11(xi) Sums
    For further sums see Prudnikov et al. (1990, pp. 396–397) and Hansen (1975, pp. 358–360). …
    18: 18.25 Wilson Class: Definitions
    Under certain conditions on their parameters the orthogonality range for the Wilson polynomials and continuous dual Hahn polynomials is ( 0 , ) S , where S is a specific finite set, e. …
    18.25.5 h n = n !  2 π j < Γ ( n + a j + a ) ( 2 n 1 + j a j ) Γ ( n 1 + j a j ) .
    18.25.9 y = 0 N p n ( y ( y + γ + δ + 1 ) ) p m ( y ( y + γ + δ + 1 ) ) γ + δ + 1 + 2 y γ + δ + 1 + y ω y = h n δ n , m .
    18.25.11 ω y = ( α + 1 ) y ( β + δ + 1 ) y ( γ + 1 ) y ( γ + δ + 2 ) y ( α + γ + δ + 1 ) y ( β + γ + 1 ) y ( δ + 1 ) y y ! ,
    18.25.15 h n = n ! ( N n ) ! ( γ + δ + 2 ) N N ! ( γ + 1 ) n ( δ + 1 ) N n .
    19: 24.4 Basic Properties
    §24.4(iii) Sums of Powers
    24.4.11 k = 1 ( k , m ) = 1 m k n = 1 n + 1 j = 1 n + 1 ( n + 1 j ) ( p | m ( 1 p n j ) B n + 1 j ) m j .
    §24.4(iv) Finite Expansions
    24.4.24 B n ( m x ) = m n B n ( x ) + n k = 1 n j = 0 k 1 ( 1 ) j ( n k ) ( r = 1 m 1 e 2 π i ( k j ) r / m ( 1 e 2 π i r / m ) n ) ( j + m x ) n 1 , n = 1 , 2 , , m = 2 , 3 , .
    §24.4(viii) Symbolic Operations
    20: 18.39 Applications in the Physical Sciences
    where x is a spatial coordinate, m the mass of the particle with potential energy V ( x ) , = h / ( 2 π ) is the reduced Planck’s constant, and ( a , b ) a finite or infinite interval. … As in classical dynamics this sum is the total energy of the one particle system. … The finite system of functions ψ n is orthonormal in L 2 ( , d x ) , see (18.34.7_3). …
    §18.39(iv) Coulomb–Pollaczek Polynomials and J-Matrix Methods
    This equivalent quadrature relationship, see Heller et al. (1973), Yamani and Reinhardt (1975), allows extraction of scattering information from the finite dimensional L 2 functions of (18.39.53), provided that such information involves potentials, or projections onto L 2 functions, exactly expressed, or well approximated, in the finite basis of (18.39.44). …