argument xe±3πi/4
(0.002 seconds)
11—20 of 619 matching pages
11: 20.16 Software
12: 22.22 Software
13: 13.19 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
§13.19 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
… ►
13.19.1
.
…
►provided that both .
…
►
13.19.3
.
…
►
14: 16.24 Physical Applications
…
►
§16.24(iii) , , and Symbols
►The symbols, or Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, play an important role in the decomposition of reducible representations of the rotation group into irreducible representations. They can be expressed as functions with unit argument. …These are balanced functions with unit argument. Lastly, special cases of the symbols are functions with unit argument. …15: 10.40 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
§10.40 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
… ►Products
… ► … ►§10.40(ii) Error Bounds for Real Argument and Order
… ►§10.40(iii) Error Bounds for Complex Argument and Order
…16: 34.13 Methods of Computation
§34.13 Methods of Computation
►Methods of computation for and symbols include recursion relations, see Schulten and Gordon (1975a), Luscombe and Luban (1998), and Edmonds (1974, pp. 42–45, 48–51, 97–99); summation of single-sum expressions for these symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §§8.2.6, 9.2.1) and Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of the generalized hypergeometric functions of unit argument that represent these symbols, see Srinivasa Rao and Venkatesh (1978) and Srinivasa Rao (1981). …17: 10.17 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
§10.17 Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument
… ►§10.17(ii) Asymptotic Expansions of Derivatives
… ►§10.17(iii) Error Bounds for Real Argument and Order
… ►§10.17(iv) Error Bounds for Complex Argument and Order
… ►§10.17(v) Exponentially-Improved Expansions
…18: 4.46 Tables
…
►Extensive numerical tables of all the elementary functions for real values of their arguments appear in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 4).
…
►(These roots are zeros of the Bessel function ; see §10.21.)
…
19: Software Index
…
►
►
…
Open Source | With Book | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||
… | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16.27(ii) Real Arguments | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | a | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||||||
16.27(iii) Complex Arguments | ✓ | a | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||||||||||
… | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
22.22(ii) Real Argument | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
22.22(iii) Complex Argument | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | a | ✓ | |||||||||||||||
… | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23.24(ii) Real Argument | ✓ | ✓ | a | ||||||||||||||||||||||
… |
20: 19.14 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
…
►
19.14.1
,
.
►
19.14.2
,
.
…
►
19.14.5
…
►The classical method of reducing (19.2.3) to Legendre’s integrals is described in many places, especially Erdélyi et al. (1953b, §13.5), Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 17), and Labahn and Mutrie (1997, §3).
…If no such branch point is accessible from the interval of integration (for example, if the integrand is and the interval is [1,2]), then no method using this assumption succeeds.
…