About the Project

Bulirsch%0Aelliptic%20integrals

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

21—30 of 792 matching pages

21: Bibliography M
  • D. A. MacDonald (1989) The roots of J 0 ( z ) i J 1 ( z ) = 0 . Quart. Appl. Math. 47 (2), pp. 375–378.
  • A. J. MacLeod (1996b) Rational approximations, software and test methods for sine and cosine integrals. Numer. Algorithms 12 (3-4), pp. 259–272.
  • C. S. Meijer (1932) Über die asymptotische Entwicklung von 0 i ( arg w μ ) e ν z w sinh z 𝑑 z , ( π 2 < μ < π 2 ) für große Werte von | w | und | ν | . I, II. Proc. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam 35, pp. 1170–1180, 1291–1303 (German).
  • P. Midy (1975) An improved calculation of the general elliptic integral of the second kind in the neighbourhood of x = 0 . Numer. Math. 25 (1), pp. 99–101.
  • D. S. Moak (1981) The q -analogue of the Laguerre polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 81 (1), pp. 20–47.
  • 22: 3.3 Interpolation
    where the nodes x k = x 0 + k h ( h > 0 ) and function f are real, … For example, for k + 1 coincident points the limiting form is given by [ z 0 , z 0 , , z 0 ] f = f ( k ) ( z 0 ) / k ! . … It can be used for solving a nonlinear scalar equation f ( z ) = 0 approximately. … and with f = 0 we find that x = 2.33823 2462 , with 4 correct digits. … For Hermite interpolation, trigonometric interpolation, spline interpolation, rational interpolation (by using continued fractions), interpolation based on Chebyshev points, and bivariate interpolation, see Bulirsch and Rutishauser (1968), Davis (1975, pp. 27–31), and Mason and Handscomb (2003, Chapter 6). …
    23: 6.20 Approximations
  • Cody and Thacher (1968) provides minimax rational approximations for E 1 ( x ) , with accuracies up to 20S.

  • Cody and Thacher (1969) provides minimax rational approximations for Ei ( x ) , with accuracies up to 20S.

  • MacLeod (1996b) provides rational approximations for the sine and cosine integrals and for the auxiliary functions f and g , with accuracies up to 20S.

  • Luke and Wimp (1963) covers Ei ( x ) for x 4 (20D), and Si ( x ) and Ci ( x ) for x 4 (20D).

  • Luke (1969b, pp. 321–322) covers Ein ( x ) and Ein ( x ) for 0 x 8 (the Chebyshev coefficients are given to 20D); E 1 ( x ) for x 5 (20D), and Ei ( x ) for x 8 (15D). Coefficients for the sine and cosine integrals are given on pp. 325–327.

  • 24: 10.75 Tables
  • Achenbach (1986) tabulates J 0 ( x ) , J 1 ( x ) , Y 0 ( x ) , Y 1 ( x ) , x = 0 ( .1 ) 8 , 20D or 18–20S.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 11) tabulates 0 x J 0 ( t ) d t , 0 x Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 , 10D; 0 x t 1 ( 1 J 0 ( t ) ) d t , x t 1 Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 5 , 8D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 270) tabulates 0 x J 0 ( t ) d t , 0 x t 1 ( 1 J 0 ( t ) ) d t , 0 x Y 0 ( t ) d t , x t 1 Y 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 ( .5 ) 20 , 8D.

  • Bickley et al. (1952) tabulates x n I n ( x ) or e x I n ( x ) , x n K n ( x ) or e x K n ( x ) , n = 2 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 (.01 or .1) 10(.1) 20, 8S; I n ( x ) , K n ( x ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 or 0.1 ( .1 ) 20 , 10S.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 271) tabulates e x 0 x I 0 ( t ) d t , e x 0 x t 1 ( I 0 ( t ) 1 ) d t , e x x K 0 ( t ) d t , x e x x t 1 K 0 ( t ) d t , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 ( .5 ) 20 , 8D.

  • 25: 11.14 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 12) tabulates 𝐇 n ( x ) , 𝐇 n ( x ) Y n ( x ) , and I n ( x ) 𝐋 n ( x ) for n = 0 , 1 and x = 0 ( .1 ) 5 , x 1 = 0 ( .01 ) 0.2 to 6D or 7D.

  • Agrest et al. (1982) tabulates 𝐇 n ( x ) and e x 𝐋 n ( x ) for n = 0 , 1 and x = 0 ( .001 ) 5 ( .005 ) 15 ( .01 ) 100 to 11D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996) tabulates 𝐇 n ( x ) and 𝐋 n ( x ) for n = 4 ( 1 ) 3 and x = 0 ( 1 ) 20 to 8D or 7S.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 12) tabulates 0 x ( I 0 ( t ) 𝐋 0 ( t ) ) d t and ( 2 / π ) x t 1 𝐇 0 ( t ) d t for x = 0 ( .1 ) 5 to 5D or 7D; 0 x ( 𝐇 0 ( t ) Y 0 ( t ) ) d t ( 2 / π ) ln x , 0 x ( I 0 ( t ) 𝐋 0 ( t ) ) d t ( 2 / π ) ln x , and x t 1 ( 𝐇 0 ( t ) Y 0 ( t ) ) d t for x 1 = 0 ( .01 ) 0.2 to 6D.

  • Agrest et al. (1982) tabulates 0 x 𝐇 0 ( t ) d t and e x 0 x 𝐋 0 ( t ) d t for x = 0 ( .001 ) 5 ( .005 ) 15 ( .01 ) 100 to 11D.

  • 26: 33.24 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 14) tabulates F 0 ( η , ρ ) , G 0 ( η , ρ ) , F 0 ( η , ρ ) , and G 0 ( η , ρ ) for η = 0.5 ( .5 ) 20 and ρ = 1 ( 1 ) 20 , 5S; C 0 ( η ) for η = 0 ( .05 ) 3 , 6S.

  • Curtis (1964a) tabulates P ( ϵ , r ) , Q ( ϵ , r ) 33.1), and related functions for = 0 , 1 , 2 and ϵ = 2 ( .2 ) 2 , with x = 0 ( .1 ) 4 for ϵ < 0 and x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 for ϵ 0 ; 6D.

  • 27: 7.23 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 7) includes erf x , ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , x [ 0 , 2 ] , 10D; ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , x [ 2 , 10 ] , 8S; x e x 2 erfc x , x 2 [ 0 , 0.25 ] , 7D; 2 n Γ ( 1 2 n + 1 ) i n erfc ( x ) , n = 1 ( 1 ) 6 , 10 , 11 , x [ 0 , 5 ] , 6S; F ( x ) , x [ 0 , 2 ] , 10D; x F ( x ) , x 2 [ 0 , 0.25 ] , 9D; C ( x ) , S ( x ) , x [ 0 , 5 ] , 7D; f ( x ) , g ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] , x 1 [ 0 , 1 ] , 15D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Table 27.6) includes the Goodwin–Staton integral G ( x ) , x = 1 ( .1 ) 3 ( .5 ) 8 , 4D; also G ( x ) + ln x , x = 0 ( .05 ) 1 , 4D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 637, 639) includes ( 2 / π ) e x 2 , erf x , x = 0 ( .02 ) 1 ( .04 ) 3 , 8D; C ( x ) , S ( x ) , x = 0 ( .2 ) 10 ( 2 ) 100 ( 100 ) 500 , 8D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 7) includes w ( z ) , x = 0 ( .1 ) 3.9 , y = 0 ( .1 ) 3 , 6D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 638, 640–641) includes the real and imaginary parts of erf z , x [ 0 , 5 ] , y = 0.5 ( .5 ) 3 , 7D and 8D, respectively; the real and imaginary parts of x e ± i t 2 d t , ( 1 / π ) e i ( x 2 + ( π / 4 ) ) x e ± i t 2 d t , x = 0 ( .5 ) 20 ( 1 ) 25 , 8D, together with the corresponding modulus and phase to 8D and 6D (degrees), respectively.

  • 28: 6.16 Mathematical Applications
    §6.16(i) The Gibbs Phenomenon
    Hence, if x is fixed and n , then S n ( x ) 1 4 π , 0 , or 1 4 π according as 0 < x < π , x = 0 , or π < x < 0 ; compare (6.2.14). … The first maximum of 1 2 Si ( x ) for positive x occurs at x = π and equals ( 1.1789 ) × 1 4 π ; compare Figure 6.3.2. …
    §6.16(ii) Number-Theoretic Significance of li ( x )
    If we assume Riemann’s hypothesis that all nonreal zeros of ζ ( s ) have real part of 1 2 25.10(i)), then …
    29: 9.18 Tables
  • Zhang and Jin (1996, p. 337) tabulates Ai ( x ) , Ai ( x ) , Bi ( x ) , Bi ( x ) for x = 0 ( 1 ) 20 to 8S and for x = 20 ( 1 ) 0 to 9D.

  • Rothman (1954b) tabulates 0 x Ai ( t ) d t and 0 x Bi ( t ) d t for x = 10 ( .1 ) and 10 ( .1 ) 2 , respectively; 7D. The entries in the columns headed 0 x Ai ( x ) d x and 0 x Bi ( x ) d x all have the wrong sign. The tables are reproduced in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10), and the sign errors are corrected in later reprintings.

  • National Bureau of Standards (1958) tabulates 0 x Ai ( t ) d t and 0 x 0 v Ai ( t ) d t d v (see (9.10.20)) for x = 2 ( .01 ) 5 to 8D and 7D, respectively.

  • Scorer (1950) tabulates Gi ( x ) and Hi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ; 7D.

  • Rothman (1954a) tabulates 0 x Gi ( t ) d t , Gi ( x ) , 0 x Hi ( t ) d t , Hi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 ; 7D.

  • 30: 25.12 Polylogarithms
    When z = e i θ , 0 θ 2 π , (25.12.1) becomes …
    Integral Representation
    valid when s > 0 , a > 0 or s > 1 , a = 0 . … The Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein integrals are defined by … In terms of polylogarithms …