About the Project

umbilics

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—17 of 17 matching pages

11: 36.7 Zeros
§36.7(iii) Elliptic Umbilic Canonical Integral
The zeros are lines in 𝐱 = ( x , y , z ) space where ph Ψ ( E ) ( 𝐱 ) is undetermined. …Near z = z n , and for small x and y , the modulus | Ψ ( E ) ( 𝐱 ) | has the symmetry of a lattice with a rhombohedral unit cell that has a mirror plane and an inverse threefold axis whose z and x repeat distances are given by …
§36.7(iv) Swallowtail and Hyperbolic Umbilic Canonical Integrals
The zeros of these functions are curves in 𝐱 = ( x , y , z ) space; see Nye (2007) for Φ 3 and Nye (2006) for Φ ( H ) .
12: Bibliography U
  • T. Uzer, J. T. Muckerman, and M. S. Child (1983) Collisions and umbilic catastrophes. The hyperbolic umbilic canonical diffraction integral. Molecular Phys. 50 (6), pp. 1215–1230.
  • 13: 36.15 Methods of Computation
    (For the umbilics, representations as one-dimensional integrals (§36.2) are used.) …
    14: Errata
  • Figures 36.3.9, 36.3.10, 36.3.11, 36.3.12

    Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.9: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.10: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.11: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.12: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) | .

    Reported 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi.

  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • Equation (36.10.14)
    36.10.14 3 ( 2 Ψ ( E ) x 2 2 Ψ ( E ) y 2 ) + 2 i z Ψ ( E ) x x Ψ ( E ) = 0

    Originally this equation appeared with Ψ ( H ) x in the second term, rather than Ψ ( E ) x .

    Reported 2010-04-02.

  • 15: 36.12 Uniform Approximation of Integrals
    For further information concerning integrals with several coalescing saddle points see Arnol’d et al. (1988), Berry and Howls (1993, 1994), Bleistein (1967), Duistermaat (1974), Ludwig (1966), Olde Daalhuis (2000), and Ursell (1972, 1980).
    16: Bibliography N
  • J. F. Nye (2006) Dislocation lines in the hyperbolic umbilic diffraction catastrophe. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 462, pp. 2299–2313.
  • 17: Bibliography B
  • M. V. Berry, J. F. Nye, and F. J. Wright (1979) The elliptic umbilic diffraction catastrophe. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 291 (1382), pp. 453–484.