About the Project

q-Pochhammer%20symbol

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

11—20 of 288 matching pages

11: 34.13 Methods of Computation
§34.13 Methods of Computation
β–ΊMethods of computation for 3 ⁒ j and 6 ⁒ j symbols include recursion relations, see Schulten and Gordon (1975a), Luscombe and Luban (1998), and Edmonds (1974, pp. 42–45, 48–51, 97–99); summation of single-sum expressions for these symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §§8.2.6, 9.2.1) and Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of the generalized hypergeometric functions of unit argument that represent these symbols, see Srinivasa Rao and Venkatesh (1978) and Srinivasa Rao (1981). β–ΊFor 9 ⁒ j symbols, methods include evaluation of the single-sum series (34.6.2), see Fang and Shriner (1992); evaluation of triple-sum series, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, §10.2.1) and Srinivasa Rao et al. (1989). …
12: 34.9 Graphical Method
§34.9 Graphical Method
β–ΊThe graphical method establishes a one-to-one correspondence between an analytic expression and a diagram by assigning a graphical symbol to each function and operation of the analytic expression. …For specific examples of the graphical method of representing sums involving the 3 ⁒ j , 6 ⁒ j , and 9 ⁒ j symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, Chapters 11, 12) and Lehman and O’Connell (1973, §3.3).
13: 8 Incomplete Gamma and Related
Functions
14: 28 Mathieu Functions and Hill’s Equation
15: 8.26 Tables
β–Ί
  • Khamis (1965) tabulates P ⁑ ( a , x ) for a = 0.05 ⁒ ( .05 ) ⁒ 10 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 20 ⁒ ( .25 ) ⁒ 70 , 0.0001 x 250 to 10D.

  • β–Ί
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, pp. 245–248) tabulates E n ⁑ ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x = 0 ⁒ ( .01 ) ⁒ 2 to 7D; also ( x + n ) ⁒ e x ⁒ E n ⁑ ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x 1 = 0 ⁒ ( .01 ) ⁒ 0.1 ⁒ ( .05 ) ⁒ 0.5 to 6S.

  • β–Ί
  • Pagurova (1961) tabulates E n ⁑ ( x ) for n = 0 ⁒ ( 1 ) ⁒ 20 , x = 0 ⁒ ( .01 ) ⁒ 2 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 10 to 4-9S; e x ⁒ E n ⁑ ( x ) for n = 2 ⁒ ( 1 ) ⁒ 10 , x = 10 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 20 to 7D; e x ⁒ E p ⁑ ( x ) for p = 0 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 1 , x = 0.01 ⁒ ( .01 ) ⁒ 7 ⁒ ( .05 ) ⁒ 12 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 20 to 7S or 7D.

  • β–Ί
  • Zhang and Jin (1996, Table 19.1) tabulates E n ⁑ ( x ) for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 15 , 20 , x = 0 ⁒ ( .1 ) ⁒ 1 , 1.5 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 50 , 100 to 7D or 8S.

  • 16: 23 Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular
    Functions
    17: Bibliography R
    β–Ί
  • J. Raynal (1979) On the definition and properties of generalized 6 - j  symbols. J. Math. Phys. 20 (12), pp. 2398–2415.
  • β–Ί
  • REDUCE (free interactive system)
  • β–Ί
  • C. C. J. Roothaan and S. Lai (1997) Calculation of 3 ⁒ n - j symbols by Labarthe’s method. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 63 (1), pp. 57–64.
  • β–Ί
  • H. Rosengren (1999) Another proof of the triple sum formula for Wigner 9 ⁒ j -symbols. J. Math. Phys. 40 (12), pp. 6689–6691.
  • β–Ί
  • M. Rotenberg, R. Bivins, N. Metropolis, and J. K. Wooten, Jr. (1959) The 3 - j and 6 - j Symbols. The Technology Press, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 18: 36 Integrals with Coalescing Saddles
    19: GergΕ‘ Nemes
    β–ΊAs of September 20, 2021, Nemes performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions. …
    20: Wolter Groenevelt
    β–ΊAs of September 20, 2022, Groenevelt performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 18 Orthogonal Polynomials. …