About the Project

inversion formula

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

41—50 of 56 matching pages

41: 18.17 Integrals
Just as the indefinite integrals (18.17.1), (18.17.3) and (18.17.4), many similar formulas can be obtained by applying (1.4.26) to the differentiation formulas (18.9.15), (18.9.16) and (18.9.19)–(18.9.28). … Formulas (18.17.9), (18.17.10) and (18.17.11) are fractional generalizations of n -th derivative formulas which are, after substitution of (18.5.7), special cases of (15.5.4), (15.5.5) and (15.5.3), respectively. … Formulas (18.17.12) and (18.17.13) are fractional generalizations of the differentiation formulas given in (Erdélyi et al., 1953b, §10.9(15)). … Some of the resulting formulas are given below. … Formulas (18.17.45) and (18.17.49) are integrated forms of the linearization formulas (18.18.22) and (18.18.23), respectively. …
42: 15.12 Asymptotic Approximations
  • (d)

    z > 1 2 and α 1 2 π + δ ph c α + + 1 2 π δ , where

    15.12.1 α ± = arctan ( ph z ph ( 1 z ) π ln | 1 z 1 | ) ,

    with z restricted so that ± α ± [ 0 , 1 2 π ) .

  • 15.12.6 ζ = arccosh z .
    15.12.10 ζ = arccosh ( 1 4 z 1 ) ,
    By combination of the foregoing results of this subsection with the linear transformations of §15.8(i) and the connection formulas of §15.10(ii), similar asymptotic approximations for F ( a + e 1 λ , b + e 2 λ ; c + e 3 λ ; z ) can be obtained with e j = ± 1 or 0 , j = 1 , 2 , 3 . …
    43: Bibliography E
  • U. T. Ehrenmark (1995) The numerical inversion of two classes of Kontorovich-Lebedev transform by direct quadrature. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 61 (1), pp. 43–72.
  • D. Elliott (1998) The Euler-Maclaurin formula revisited. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 40 (E), pp. E27–E76 (electronic).
  • E. B. Elliott (1903) A formula including Legendre’s E K + K E K K = 1 2 π . Messenger of Math. 33, pp. 31–32.
  • 44: 10.68 Modulus and Phase Functions
    θ ν ( x ) = Arctan ( bei ν x / ber ν x ) ,
    ϕ ν ( x ) = Arctan ( kei ν x / ker ν x ) .
    45: 3.8 Nonlinear Equations
    Regula Falsi
    Inverse linear interpolation (§3.3(v)) is used to obtain the first approximation: …
    §3.8(iv) Zeros of Polynomials
    Explicit formulas for the zeros are available if n 4 ; see §§1.11(iii) and 4.43. No explicit general formulas exist when n 5 . …
    46: 36.7 Zeros
    More general asymptotic formulas are given in Kaminski and Paris (1999). … Near z = z n , and for small x and y , the modulus | Ψ ( E ) ( 𝐱 ) | has the symmetry of a lattice with a rhombohedral unit cell that has a mirror plane and an inverse threefold axis whose z and x repeat distances are given by …
    47: 10.43 Integrals
    10.43.21 0 sin ( a t ) K 0 ( t ) d t = arcsinh a ( 1 + a 2 ) 1 2 , | a | < 1 .
    For asymptotic expansions of the direct transform (10.43.30) see Wong (1981), and for asymptotic expansions of the inverse transform (10.43.31) see Naylor (1990, 1996). …
    48: 15.9 Relations to Other Functions
    with inverse … … The following formulas apply with principal branches of the hypergeometric functions, associated Legendre functions, and fractional powers. …
    49: Bibliography D
  • A. R. DiDonato and A. H. Morris (1986) Computation of the incomplete gamma function ratios and their inverses. ACM Trans. Math. Software 12 (4), pp. 377–393.
  • A. R. DiDonato and A. H. Morris (1987) Algorithm 654: Fortran subroutines for computing the incomplete gamma function ratios and their inverses. ACM Trans. Math. Software 13 (3), pp. 318–319.
  • A. M. Din (1981) A simple sum formula for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. Lett. Math. Phys. 5 (3), pp. 207–211.
  • L. Durand (1978) Product formulas and Nicholson-type integrals for Jacobi functions. I. Summary of results. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (1), pp. 76–86.
  • 50: 19.29 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
    Cubic cases of these formulas are obtained by setting one of the factors in (19.29.3) equal to 1. The advantages of symmetric integrals for tables of integrals and symbolic integration are illustrated by (19.29.4) and its cubic case, which replace the 8 + 8 + 12 = 28 formulas in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, 3.147, 3.131, 3.152) after taking x 2 as the variable of integration in 3. …(19.29.7) subsumes all 72 formulas in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, 3.168), and its cubic cases similarly replace the 18 + 36 + 18 = 72 formulas in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, 3.133, 3.142, and 3.141(1-18)). … The first choice gives a formula that includes the 18+9+18 = 45 formulas in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, 3.133, 3.156, 3.158), and the second choice includes the 8+8+8+12 = 36 formulas in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2000, 3.151, 3.149, 3.137, 3.157) (after setting x 2 = t in some cases). … The first formula replaces (19.14.4)–(19.14.10). …