Cayley identity for Schwarzian derivatives
(0.003 seconds)
11—20 of 366 matching pages
11: 9.18 Tables
Yakovleva (1969) tabulates Fock’s functions , , , for . Precision is 7S.
Sherry (1959) tabulates , , , , ; 20S.
National Bureau of Standards (1958) tabulates and for and ; for . Precision is 8D.
Nosova and Tumarkin (1965) tabulates , , , for ; 7D. Also included are the real and imaginary parts of and , where and ; 6-7D.
12: 13.3 Recurrence Relations and Derivatives
§13.3 Recurrence Relations and Derivatives
… ►§13.3(ii) Differentiation Formulas
… ►13: 27.14 Unrestricted Partitions
§27.14(v) Divisibility Properties
►Ramanujan (1921) gives identities that imply divisibility properties of the partition function. For example, the Ramanujan identity …implies . …For example, . …14: 24.10 Arithmetic Properties
15: 20.4 Values at = 0
§20.4 Values at = 0
►§20.4(i) Functions and First Derivatives
… ►Jacobi’s Identity
… ►§20.4(ii) Higher Derivatives
…16: 19.11 Addition Theorems
17: 20.7 Identities
§20.7 Identities
… ►Also, in further development along the lines of the notations of Neville (§20.1) and of Glaisher (§22.2), the identities (20.7.6)–(20.7.9) have been recast in a more symmetric manner with respect to suffices . … ►§20.7(v) Watson’s Identities
… ►§20.7(vii) Derivatives of Ratios of Theta Functions
… ►This reference also gives the eleven additional identities for the permutations of the four theta functions. …18: 16.19 Identities
§16.19 Identities
… ►where again . …This reference and Mathai (1993, §§2.2 and 2.4) also supply additional identities.19: Errata
The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was , was replaced with since .
Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23
In Equation (1.13.4), the determinant form of the two-argument Wronskian
was added as an equality. In ¶Wronskian (in §1.13(i)), immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added indicating that in general the -argument Wronskian is given by , where . Immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added giving the definition of the -argument Wronskian. It is explained just above (1.13.5) that this equation is often referred to as Abel’s identity. Immediately below Equation (1.13.5), a sentence was added explaining how it generalizes for th-order differential equations. A reference to Ince (1926, §5.2) was added.
A sentence and unnumbered equation
were added which indicate that care must be taken with the multivalued functions in (19.11.5). See (Cayley, 1961, pp. 103-106).
Suggested by Albert Groenenboom.
The overloaded operator is now more clearly separated (and linked) to two distinct cases: equivalence by definition (in §§1.4(ii), 1.4(v), 2.7(i), 2.10(iv), 3.1(i), 3.1(iv), 4.18, 9.18(ii), 9.18(vi), 9.18(vi), 18.2(iv), 20.2(iii), 20.7(vi), 23.20(ii), 25.10(i), 26.15, 31.17(i)); and modular equivalence (in §§24.10(i), 24.10(ii), 24.10(iii), 24.10(iv), 24.15(iii), 24.19(ii), 26.14(i), 26.21, 27.2(i), 27.8, 27.9, 27.11, 27.12, 27.14(v), 27.14(vi), 27.15, 27.16, 27.19).
Three new identities for Pochhammer’s symbol (5.2.6)–(5.2.8) have been added at the end of this subsection.
Suggested by Tom Koornwinder.