About the Project

Cayley identity for Schwarzian derivatives

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

11—20 of 366 matching pages

11: 9.18 Tables
  • Yakovleva (1969) tabulates Fock’s functions U ( x ) π Bi ( x ) , U ( x ) = π Bi ( x ) , V ( x ) π Ai ( x ) , V ( x ) = π Ai ( x ) for x = 9 ( .001 ) 9 . Precision is 7S.

  • Miller (1946) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; b k , Bi ( b k ) , b k , Bi ( b k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 . Precision is 8D. Entries for k = 1 ( 1 ) 20 are reproduced in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 10).

  • Sherry (1959) tabulates a k , Ai ( a k ) , a k , Ai ( a k ) , k = 1 ( 1 ) 50 ; 20S.

  • National Bureau of Standards (1958) tabulates A 0 ( x ) π Hi ( x ) and A 0 ( x ) π Hi ( x ) for x = 0 ( .01 ) 1 ( .02 ) 5 ( .05 ) 11 and 1 / x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 0.1 ; 0 x A 0 ( t ) d t for x = 0.5 , 1 ( 1 ) 11 . Precision is 8D.

  • Nosova and Tumarkin (1965) tabulates e 0 ( x ) π Hi ( x ) , e 0 ( x ) = π Hi ( x ) , e ~ 0 ( x ) π Gi ( x ) , e ~ 0 ( x ) = π Gi ( x ) for x = 1 ( .01 ) 10 ; 7D. Also included are the real and imaginary parts of e 0 ( z ) and i e 0 ( z ) , where z = i y and y = 0 ( .01 ) 9 ; 6-7D.

  • 12: 13.3 Recurrence Relations and Derivatives
    §13.3 Recurrence Relations and Derivatives
    §13.3(ii) Differentiation Formulas
    13.3.22 d d z U ( a , b , z ) = a U ( a + 1 , b + 1 , z ) ,
    Other versions of several of the identities in this subsection can be constructed with the aid of the operator identity
    13.3.29 ( z d d z z ) n = z n d n d z n z n , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .
    13: 27.14 Unrestricted Partitions
    §27.14(v) Divisibility Properties
    Ramanujan (1921) gives identities that imply divisibility properties of the partition function. For example, the Ramanujan identity …implies p ( 5 n + 4 ) 0 ( mod 5 ) . …For example, p ( 1575 25693 n + 1 11247 ) 0 ( mod 13 ) . …
    14: 24.10 Arithmetic Properties
    where m n 0 ( mod p 1 ) . …valid when m n ( mod ( p 1 ) p ) and n 0 ( mod p 1 ) , where ( 0 ) is a fixed integer. …
    24.10.8 N 2 n 0 ( mod p ) ,
    valid for fixed integers ( 1 ) , and for all n ( 1 ) such that 2 n 0 ( mod p 1 ) and p | 2 n .
    24.10.9 E 2 n { 0 ( mod p ) if  p 1 ( mod 4 ) , 2 ( mod p ) if  p 3 ( mod 4 ) ,
    15: 20.4 Values at z = 0
    §20.4 Values at z = 0
    §20.4(i) Functions and First Derivatives
    Jacobi’s Identity
    §20.4(ii) Higher Derivatives
    16: 19.11 Addition Theorems
    17: 20.7 Identities
    §20.7 Identities
    Also, in further development along the lines of the notations of Neville (§20.1) and of Glaisher (§22.2), the identities (20.7.6)–(20.7.9) have been recast in a more symmetric manner with respect to suffices 2 , 3 , 4 . …
    §20.7(v) Watson’s Identities
    §20.7(vii) Derivatives of Ratios of Theta Functions
    This reference also gives the eleven additional identities for the permutations of the four theta functions. …
    18: 16.19 Identities
    §16.19 Identities
    where again ϑ = z d / d z . …This reference and Mathai (1993, §§2.2 and 2.4) also supply additional identities.
    19: Errata
  • Equation (25.15.6)
    25.15.6 G ( χ ) r = 1 k 1 χ ( r ) e 2 π i r / k .

    The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was k , was replaced with k 1 since χ ( k ) = 0 .

    Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23

  • Section 1.13

    In Equation (1.13.4), the determinant form of the two-argument Wronskian

    1.13.4 𝒲 { w 1 ( z ) , w 2 ( z ) } = det [ w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) ] = w 1 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 2 ( z ) w 1 ( z )

    was added as an equality. In ¶Wronskian (in §1.13(i)), immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added indicating that in general the n -argument Wronskian is given by 𝒲 { w 1 ( z ) , , w n ( z ) } = det [ w k ( j 1 ) ( z ) ] , where 1 j , k n . Immediately below Equation (1.13.4), a sentence was added giving the definition of the n -argument Wronskian. It is explained just above (1.13.5) that this equation is often referred to as Abel’s identity. Immediately below Equation (1.13.5), a sentence was added explaining how it generalizes for n th-order differential equations. A reference to Ince (1926, §5.2) was added.

  • Subsection 19.11(i)

    A sentence and unnumbered equation

    R C ( γ δ , γ ) = 1 δ arctan ( δ sin θ sin ϕ sin ψ α 2 1 α 2 cos θ cos ϕ cos ψ ) ,

    were added which indicate that care must be taken with the multivalued functions in (19.11.5). See (Cayley, 1961, pp. 103-106).

    Suggested by Albert Groenenboom.

  • Notation

    The overloaded operator is now more clearly separated (and linked) to two distinct cases: equivalence by definition (in §§1.4(ii), 1.4(v), 2.7(i), 2.10(iv), 3.1(i), 3.1(iv), 4.18, 9.18(ii), 9.18(vi), 9.18(vi), 18.2(iv), 20.2(iii), 20.7(vi), 23.20(ii), 25.10(i), 26.15, 31.17(i)); and modular equivalence (in §§24.10(i), 24.10(ii), 24.10(iii), 24.10(iv), 24.15(iii), 24.19(ii), 26.14(i), 26.21, 27.2(i), 27.8, 27.9, 27.11, 27.12, 27.14(v), 27.14(vi), 27.15, 27.16, 27.19).

  • Subsection 5.2(iii)

    Three new identities for Pochhammer’s symbol (5.2.6)–(5.2.8) have been added at the end of this subsection.

    Suggested by Tom Koornwinder.

  • 20: 15.5 Derivatives and Contiguous Functions
    §15.5 Derivatives and Contiguous Functions
    §15.5(i) Differentiation Formulas
    Other versions of several of the identities in this subsection can be constructed with the aid of the operator identity
    15.5.10 ( z d d z z ) n = z n d n d z n z n , n = 1 , 2 , 3 , .