About the Project

threej symbols

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—18 of 18 matching pages

11: 34.4 Definition: 6 j Symbol
§34.4 Definition: 6 j Symbol
The 6 j symbol is defined by the following double sum of products of 3 j symbols:
34.4.1 { j 1 j 2 j 3 l 1 l 2 l 3 } = m r m s ( 1 ) l 1 + m 1 + l 2 + m 2 + l 3 + m 3 ( j 1 j 2 j 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ( j 1 l 2 l 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ( l 1 j 2 l 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ( l 1 l 2 j 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ,
where the summation is taken over all admissible values of the m ’s and m ’s for each of the four 3 j symbols; compare (34.2.2) and (34.2.3). Except in degenerate cases the combination of the triangle inequalities for the four 3 j symbols in (34.4.1) is equivalent to the existence of a tetrahedron (possibly degenerate) with edges of lengths j 1 , j 2 , j 3 , l 1 , l 2 , l 3 ; see Figure 34.4.1. …
12: 16.24 Physical Applications
§16.24(iii) 3 j , 6 j , and 9 j Symbols
The 3 j symbols, or Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, play an important role in the decomposition of reducible representations of the rotation group into irreducible representations. …
13: 34.7 Basic Properties: 9 j Symbol
34.7.4 ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = m r 1 , m r 2 , r = 1 , 2 , 3 ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 ) .
14: 34.5 Basic Properties: 6 j Symbol
34.5.23 ( j 1 j 2 j 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) { j 1 j 2 j 3 l 1 l 2 l 3 } = m 1 m 2 m 3 ( 1 ) l 1 + l 2 + l 3 + m 1 + m 2 + m 3 ( j 1 l 2 l 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ( l 1 j 2 l 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) ( l 1 l 2 j 3 m 1 m 2 m 3 ) .
15: 16.4 Argument Unity
See Raynal (1979) for a statement in terms of 3 j symbols (Chapter 34). …
16: 16.7 Relations to Other Functions
For 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols see Chapter 34. …
17: 34 3j, 6j, 9j Symbols
Chapter 34 3 j , 6 j , 9 j Symbols
18: Errata
  • Section 34.1

    The relation between Clebsch-Gordan and 3 j symbols was clarified, and the sign of m 3 was changed for readability. The reference Condon and Shortley (1935) for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959) and the references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise in §34.1.

  • Section 34.1

    The reference for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Condon and Shortley (1935), was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959). The references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise.

  • Equation (34.7.4)
    34.7.4 ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = m r 1 , m r 2 , r = 1 , 2 , 3 ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 )

    Originally the third 3 j symbol in the summation was written incorrectly as ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) .

    Reported 2015-01-19 by Yan-Rui Liu.

  • Equation (34.3.7)
    34.3.7 ( j 1 j 2 j 3 j 1 j 1 m 3 m 3 ) = ( 1 ) j 1 j 2 m 3 ( ( 2 j 1 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + m 3 ) ! ( j 3 m 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 + j 3 + 1 ) ! ( j 1 j 2 + j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 j 3 ) ! ( j 1 + j 2 m 3 ) ! ( j 3 + m 3 ) ! ) 1 2

    In the original equation the prefactor of the above 3j symbol read ( 1 ) j 2 + j 3 + m 3 . It is now replaced by its correct value ( 1 ) j 1 j 2 m 3 .

    Reported 2014-06-12 by James Zibin.