About the Project

scaling of variables and parameters

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

21—27 of 27 matching pages

21: 10.43 Integrals
β–Ί
10.43.2 z Ξ½ ⁒ 𝒡 Ξ½ ⁑ ( z ) ⁒ d z = Ο€ 1 2 ⁒ 2 Ξ½ 1 ⁒ Ξ“ ⁑ ( Ξ½ + 1 2 ) ⁒ z ⁒ ( 𝒡 Ξ½ ⁑ ( z ) ⁒ 𝐋 Ξ½ 1 ⁑ ( z ) 𝒡 Ξ½ 1 ⁑ ( z ) ⁒ 𝐋 Ξ½ ⁑ ( z ) ) , Ξ½ 1 2 .
β–Ί
10.43.7 0 x e ± t ⁒ t Ξ½ ⁒ I Ξ½ ⁑ ( t ) ⁒ d t = e ± x ⁒ x Ξ½ + 1 2 ⁒ Ξ½ + 1 ⁒ ( I Ξ½ ⁑ ( x ) βˆ“ I Ξ½ + 1 ⁑ ( x ) ) , ⁑ Ξ½ > 1 2 ,
β–Ί
10.43.10 x e t ⁒ t ν ⁒ K ν ⁑ ( t ) ⁒ d t = e x ⁒ x ν + 1 2 ⁒ ν 1 ⁒ ( K ν ⁑ ( x ) + K ν 1 ⁑ ( x ) ) , ⁑ ν > 1 2 .
β–Ί
10.43.26 0 K ΞΌ ⁑ ( a ⁒ t ) ⁒ J Ξ½ ⁑ ( b ⁒ t ) t Ξ» ⁒ d t = b Ξ½ ⁒ Ξ“ ⁑ ( 1 2 ⁒ Ξ½ 1 2 ⁒ Ξ» + 1 2 ⁒ ΞΌ + 1 2 ) ⁒ Ξ“ ⁑ ( 1 2 ⁒ Ξ½ 1 2 ⁒ Ξ» 1 2 ⁒ ΞΌ + 1 2 ) 2 Ξ» + 1 ⁒ a Ξ½ Ξ» + 1 ⁒ 𝐅 ⁑ ( Ξ½ Ξ» + ΞΌ + 1 2 , Ξ½ Ξ» ΞΌ + 1 2 ; Ξ½ + 1 ; b 2 a 2 ) , ⁑ ( Ξ½ + 1 Ξ» ) > | ⁑ ΞΌ | , ⁑ a > | ⁑ b | .
β–ΊFor the hypergeometric function 𝐅 see §15.2(i). …
22: Bibliography W
β–Ί
  • E. Wagner (1986) Asymptotische Darstellungen der hypergeometrischen Funktion für große Parameter unterschiedlicher Größenordnung. Z. Anal. Anwendungen 5 (3), pp. 265–276 (German).
  • β–Ί
  • E. Wagner (1990) Asymptotische Entwicklungen der Gaußschen hypergeometrischen Funktion für unbeschränkte Parameter. Z. Anal. Anwendungen 9 (4), pp. 351–360 (German).
  • β–Ί
  • P. L. Walker (2003) The analyticity of Jacobian functions with respect to the parameter k . Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser A 459, pp. 2569–2574.
  • β–Ί
  • R. Wong (1973a) An asymptotic expansion of W k , m ⁒ ( z ) with large variable and parameters. Math. Comp. 27 (122), pp. 429–436.
  • β–Ί
  • T. T. Wu, B. M. McCoy, C. A. Tracy, and E. Barouch (1976) Spin-spin correlation functions for the two-dimensional Ising model: Exact theory in the scaling region. Phys. Rev. B 13, pp. 316–374.
  • 23: 19.16 Definitions
    β–Ί
    19.16.4 s ⁑ ( t ) = t + x ⁒ t + y ⁒ t + z .
    β–ΊA fourth integral that is symmetric in only two variables is defined by … β–ΊThus R a ⁑ ( 𝐛 ; 𝐳 ) is symmetric in the variables z j and z β„“ if the parameters b j and b β„“ are equal. … β–Ί R a ⁑ ( 𝐛 ; 𝐳 ) is an elliptic integral iff the z ’s are distinct and exactly four of the parameters a , a , b 1 , , b n are half-odd-integers, the rest are integers, and none of a , a , a + a is zero or a negative integer. … β–ΊWhen one variable is 0 without destroying convergence, any one of (19.16.14)–(19.16.17) is said to be complete and can be written as an R -function with one less variable: …
    24: 15.3 Graphics
    β–Ί
    β–Ί
    See accompanying text
    β–Ί
    Figure 15.3.7: | 𝐅 ⁑ ( 3 , 3 5 ; u + i ⁒ v ; 1 2 ) | , 6 u 2 , 2 v 2 . Magnify 3D Help
    25: Mathematical Introduction
    β–ΊFor example, for the hypergeometric function we often use the notation 𝐅 ⁑ ( a , b ; c ; z ) 15.2(i)) in place of the more conventional F 1 2 ⁑ ( a , b ; c ; z ) or F ⁑ ( a , b ; c ; z ) . This is because 𝐅 is akin to the notation used for Bessel functions (§10.2(ii)), inasmuch as 𝐅 is an entire function of each of its parameters a , b , and c :​ this results in fewer restrictions and simpler equations. … β–ΊSpecial functions with one real variable are depicted graphically with conventional two-dimensional (2D) line graphs. … β–ΊSpecial functions with a complex variable are depicted as colored 3D surfaces in a similar way to functions of two real variables, but with the vertical height corresponding to the modulus (absolute value) of the function. … β–ΊThis means that the variable x ranges from 0 to 1 in intervals of 0. …
    26: 18.39 Applications in the Physical Sciences
    β–ΊThe solutions (18.39.8) are called the stationary states as separation of variables in (18.39.9) yields solutions of form … β–Ί
    §18.39(ii) A 3D Separable Quantum System, the Hydrogen Atom
    β–ΊThe fact that both the eigenvalues of (18.39.31) and the scaling of the r co-ordinate in the eigenfunctions, (18.39.30), depend on the sum p + l + 1 leads to the substitution … β–ΊA major difficulty in such calculations, loss of precision, is addressed in Gautschi (2009) where use of variable precision arithmetic is discussed and employed. … β–Ίwhere s is a real, positive, scaling factor, and l a non-negative integer. …
    27: Errata
    β–Ί
  • Rearrangement

    In previous versions of the DLMF, in §8.18(ii), the notation Ξ“ ~ ⁒ ( z ) was used for the scaled gamma function Ξ“ ⁑ ( z ) . Now in §8.18(ii), we adopt the notation which was introduced in Version 1.1.7 (October 15, 2022) and correspondingly, Equation (8.18.13) has been removed. In place of Equation (8.18.13), it is now mentioned to see (5.11.3).

  • β–Ί
  • Additions

    Equations: (5.9.2_5), (5.9.10_1), (5.9.10_2), (5.9.11_1), (5.9.11_2), the definition of the scaled gamma function Ξ“ ⁑ ( z ) was inserted after the first equals sign in (5.11.3), post equality added in (7.17.2) which gives “ = m = 0 a m ⁒ t 2 ⁒ m + 1 ”, (7.17.2_5), (31.11.3_1), (31.11.3_2) with some explanatory text.

  • β–Ί
  • Equations (15.6.1)–(15.6.9)

    The Olver hypergeometric function 𝐅 ⁑ ( a , b ; c ; z ) , previously omitted from the left-hand sides to make the formulas more concise, has been added. In Equations (15.6.1)–(15.6.5), (15.6.7)–(15.6.9), the constraint | ph ⁑ ( 1 z ) | < Ο€ has been added. In (15.6.6), the constraint | ph ⁑ ( z ) | < Ο€ has been added. In Section 15.6 Integral Representations, the sentence immediately following (15.6.9), “These representations are valid when | ph ⁑ ( 1 z ) | < Ο€ , except (15.6.6) which holds for | ph ⁑ ( z ) | < Ο€ .”, has been removed.

  • β–Ί
  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • β–Ί
  • Equation (14.19.2)
    14.19.2 P Ξ½ 1 2 ΞΌ ⁑ ( cosh ⁑ ΞΎ ) = Ξ“ ⁑ ( 1 2 ΞΌ ) Ο€ 1 / 2 ⁒ ( 1 e 2 ⁒ ΞΎ ) ΞΌ ⁒ e ( Ξ½ + ( 1 / 2 ) ) ⁒ ΞΎ ⁒ 𝐅 ⁑ ( 1 2 ΞΌ , 1 2 + Ξ½ ΞΌ ; 1 2 ⁒ ΞΌ ; 1 e 2 ⁒ ΞΎ ) , ΞΌ 1 2 , 3 2 , 5 2 ,

    Originally the argument to 𝐅 in this equation was incorrect ( e 2 ⁒ ΞΎ , rather than 1 e 2 ⁒ ΞΎ ), and the condition on ΞΌ was too weak ( ΞΌ 1 2 , rather than ΞΌ 1 2 , 3 2 , 5 2 , ). Also, the factor multiplying 𝐅 was rewritten to clarify the poles; originally it was Ξ“ ⁑ ( 1 2 ⁒ ΞΌ ) ⁒ 2 2 ⁒ ΞΌ Ξ“ ⁑ ( 1 ΞΌ ) ⁒ ( 1 e 2 ⁒ ΞΎ ) ΞΌ ⁒ e ( Ξ½ + ( 1 / 2 ) ) ⁒ ΞΎ .

    Reported 2010-11-02 by Alvaro Valenzuela.