About the Project

reduction to basic elliptic integrals

AdvancedHelp

(0.004 seconds)

11—20 of 907 matching pages

11: 7.2 Definitions
§7.2(ii) Dawson’s Integral
§7.2(iii) Fresnel Integrals
Values at Infinity
§7.2(iv) Auxiliary Functions
§7.2(v) Goodwin–Staton Integral
12: 7.18 Repeated Integrals of the Complementary Error Function
§7.18 Repeated Integrals of the Complementary Error Function
Hermite Polynomials
Confluent Hypergeometric Functions
Parabolic Cylinder Functions
Probability Functions
13: 22.16 Related Functions
§22.16(i) Jacobi’s Amplitude ( am ) Function
Integral Representation
Relation to Elliptic Integrals
Relation to the Elliptic Integral E ( ϕ , k )
Definition
14: 19.29 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
§19.29 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
§19.29(i) Reduction Theorems
§19.29(ii) Reduction to Basic Integrals
Partial fractions provide a reduction to integrals in which 𝐦 has at most one nonzero component, and these are then reduced to basic integrals by the recurrence relations. … For an implementation by James FitzSimons of the method for reducing I ( 𝐦 ) to basic integrals and extensive tables of such reductions, see Carlson (1999) and Carlson and FitzSimons (2000). …
15: 19.14 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
§19.14 Reduction of General Elliptic Integrals
It then improves the classical method by first applying Hermite reduction to (19.2.3) to arrive at integrands without multiple poles and uses implicit full partial-fraction decomposition and implicit root finding to minimize computing with algebraic extensions. The choice among 21 transformations for final reduction to Legendre’s normal form depends on inequalities involving the limits of integration and the zeros of the cubic or quartic polynomial. A similar remark applies to the transformations given in Erdélyi et al. (1953b, §13.5) and to the choice among explicit reductions in the extensive table of Byrd and Friedman (1971), in which one limit of integration is assumed to be a branch point of the integrand at which the integral converges. …
16: 19.15 Advantages of Symmetry
§19.15 Advantages of Symmetry
Symmetry makes possible the reduction theorems of §19.29(i), permitting remarkable compression of tables of integrals while generalizing the interval of integration. …These reduction theorems, unknown in the Legendre theory, allow symbolic integration without imposing conditions on the parameters and the limits of integration (see §19.29(ii)). …
17: 32.13 Reductions of Partial Differential Equations
§32.13 Reductions of Partial Differential Equations
has the scaling reductionhas the scaling reductionEquation (32.13.3) also has the similarity reductionhas the scaling reduction
18: 31.7 Relations to Other Functions
§31.7(i) Reductions to the Gauss Hypergeometric Function
Other reductions of H to a F 1 2 , with at least one free parameter, exist iff the pair ( a , p ) takes one of a finite number of values, where q = α β p . Below are three such reductions with three and two parameters. … For additional reductions, see Maier (2005). Joyce (1994) gives a reduction in which the independent variable is transformed not polynomially or rationally, but algebraically. …
19: Peter A. Clarkson
 Kruskal, he developed the “direct method” for determining symmetry solutions of partial differential equations in New similarity reductions of the Boussinesq equation (with M. …He is also coauthor of the book From Nonlinearity to Coherence: Universal Features of Nonlinear Behaviour in Many-Body Physics (with J. …
20: Bibliography C
  • B. C. Carlson and J. FitzSimons (2000) Reduction theorems for elliptic integrands with the square root of two quadratic factors. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 118 (1-2), pp. 71–85.
  • B. C. Carlson (1999) Toward symbolic integration of elliptic integrals. J. Symbolic Comput. 28 (6), pp. 739–753.
  • B. C. Carlson (2002) Three improvements in reduction and computation of elliptic integrals. J. Res. Nat. Inst. Standards Tech. 107 (5), pp. 413–418.
  • B. C. Carlson (2006b) Table of integrals of squared Jacobian elliptic functions and reductions of related hypergeometric R -functions. Math. Comp. 75 (255), pp. 1309–1318.
  • P. A. Clarkson and M. D. Kruskal (1989) New similarity reductions of the Boussinesq equation. J. Math. Phys. 30 (10), pp. 2201–2213.