About the Project

canonical denominator (or numerator)

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—20 of 45 matching pages

11: 36.8 Convergent Series Expansions
§36.8 Convergent Series Expansions
β–Ί
Ξ¨ K ⁑ ( 𝐱 ) = 2 K + 2 ⁒ n = 0 exp ⁑ ( i ⁒ Ο€ ⁒ ( 2 ⁒ n + 1 ) 2 ⁒ ( K + 2 ) ) ⁒ Ξ“ ⁑ ( 2 ⁒ n + 1 K + 2 ) ⁒ a 2 ⁒ n ⁑ ( 𝐱 ) , K even,
β–ΊFor multinomial power series for Ξ¨ K ⁑ ( 𝐱 ) , see Connor and Curtis (1982). β–Ί
36.8.3 3 2 / 3 4 ⁒ Ο€ 2 ⁒ Ξ¨ ( H ) ⁑ ( 3 1 / 3 ⁒ 𝐱 ) = Ai ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( y ) ⁒ n = 0 ( 3 1 / 3 ⁒ i ⁒ z ) n ⁒ c n ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ c n ⁑ ( y ) n ! + Ai ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( y ) ⁒ n = 2 ( 3 1 / 3 ⁒ i ⁒ z ) n ⁒ c n ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ d n ⁑ ( y ) n ! + Ai ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( y ) ⁒ n = 2 ( 3 1 / 3 ⁒ i ⁒ z ) n ⁒ d n ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ c n ⁑ ( y ) n ! + Ai ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ Ai ⁑ ( y ) ⁒ n = 1 ( 3 1 / 3 ⁒ i ⁒ z ) n ⁒ d n ⁑ ( x ) ⁒ d n ⁑ ( y ) n ! ,
β–Ί
36.8.4 Ξ¨ ( E ) ⁑ ( 𝐱 ) = 2 ⁒ Ο€ 2 ⁒ ( 2 3 ) 2 / 3 ⁒ n = 0 ( i ⁒ ( 2 / 3 ) 2 / 3 ⁒ z ) n n ! ⁒ ⁑ ( f n ⁑ ( x + i ⁒ y 12 1 / 3 , x i ⁒ y 12 1 / 3 ) ) ,
12: 14.14 Continued Fractions
β–Ί
14.14.1 1 2 ⁒ ( x 2 1 ) 1 / 2 ⁒ P Ξ½ ΞΌ ⁑ ( x ) P Ξ½ ΞΌ 1 ⁑ ( x ) = x 0 y 0 + x 1 y 1 + x 2 y 2 + β‹― ,
β–Ίwhere … β–Ί
14.14.3 ( Ξ½ ΞΌ ) ⁒ Q Ξ½ ΞΌ ⁑ ( x ) Q Ξ½ 1 ΞΌ ⁑ ( x ) = x 0 y 0 x 1 y 1 x 2 y 2 β‹― , Ξ½ ΞΌ ,
13: 18.13 Continued Fractions
β–Ί T n ⁑ ( x ) is the denominator of the n th approximant to: …and U n ⁑ ( x ) is the denominator of the n th approximant to: … β–Ί P n ⁑ ( x ) is the denominator of the n th approximant to: … β–Ί L n ⁑ ( x ) is the denominator of the n th approximant to: … β–Ί H n ⁑ ( x ) is the denominator of the n th approximant to: …
14: Errata
β–ΊWe have significantly expanded the section on associated orthogonal polynomials, including expanded properties of associated Laguerre, Hermite, Meixner–Pollaczek, and corecursive orthogonal and numerator and denominator orthogonal polynomials. … β–Ί
  • Equation (17.4.6)

    The multi-product notation ( q , c ; q ) m ⁒ ( q , c ; q ) n in the denominator of the right-hand side was used.

  • β–Ί
  • Figures 36.3.9, 36.3.10, 36.3.11, 36.3.12

    Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.9: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 0 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.10: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 1 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.11: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 2 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.12: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 3 ) | .

    Reported 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi.

  • β–Ί
  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph ⁑ Ψ ( H ) ⁑ ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • β–Ί
  • Equation (36.10.14)
    36.10.14 3 ⁒ ( 2 Ψ ( E ) x 2 2 Ψ ( E ) y 2 ) + 2 ⁒ i ⁒ z ⁒ Ψ ( E ) x x ⁒ Ψ ( E ) = 0

    Originally this equation appeared with Ξ¨ ( H ) x in the second term, rather than Ξ¨ ( E ) x .

    Reported 2010-04-02.

  • 15: 36.12 Uniform Approximation of Integrals
    §36.12 Uniform Approximation of Integrals
    β–ΊThe canonical integrals (36.2.4) provide a basis for uniform asymptotic approximations of oscillatory integrals. … β–ΊThis technique can be applied to generate a hierarchy of approximations for the diffraction catastrophes Ξ¨ K ⁑ ( 𝐱 ; k ) in (36.2.10) away from 𝐱 = 𝟎 , in terms of canonical integrals Ξ¨ J ⁑ ( ΞΎ ⁑ ( 𝐱 ; k ) ) for J < K . For example, the diffraction catastrophe Ξ¨ 2 ⁑ ( x , y ; k ) defined by (36.2.10), and corresponding to the Pearcey integral (36.2.14), can be approximated by the Airy function Ξ¨ 1 ⁑ ( ΞΎ ⁑ ( x , y ; k ) ) when k is large, provided that x and y are not small. … β–ΊFor further information concerning integrals with several coalescing saddle points see Arnol’d et al. (1988), Berry and Howls (1993, 1994), Bleistein (1967), Duistermaat (1974), Ludwig (1966), Olde Daalhuis (2000), and Ursell (1972, 1980).
    16: 36.15 Methods of Computation
    β–ΊThis can be carried out by direct numerical evaluation of canonical integrals along a finite segment of the real axis including all real critical points of Ξ¦ , with contributions from the contour outside this range approximated by the first terms of an asymptotic series associated with the endpoints. … β–ΊFor numerical solution of partial differential equations satisfied by the canonical integrals see Connor et al. (1983).
    17: 36.5 Stokes Sets
    β–Ί
    §36.5(ii) Cuspoids
    β–Ί
    §36.5(iii) Umbilics
    β–Ί
    §36.5(iv) Visualizations
    β–ΊRed and blue numbers in each region correspond, respectively, to the numbers of real and complex critical points that contribute to the asymptotics of the canonical integral away from the bifurcation sets. … β–Ί
    β–ΊSee accompanying textβ–Ί
    Figure 36.5.8: Sheets of the Stokes surface for the elliptic umbilic catastrophe (colored and with mesh) and the bifurcation set (gray). Magnify
    18: 18.30 Associated OP’s
    β–Ί
    Numerator and Denominator Polynomials
    β–ΊThe p n ( 0 ) ⁑ ( x ) are also referred to as the numerator polynomials, the p n ⁑ ( x ) then being the denominator polynomials, in that the n -th approximant of the continued fraction, z β„‚ , … β–Ί
    Markov’s Theorem
    β–ΊThe ratio p n ( 0 ) ⁑ ( z ) / p n ⁑ ( z ) , as defined here, thus provides the same statement of Markov’s Theorem, as in (18.2.9_5), but now in terms of differently obtained numerator and denominator polynomials. …
    19: Bibliography U
    β–Ί
  • T. Uzer, J. T. Muckerman, and M. S. Child (1983) Collisions and umbilic catastrophes. The hyperbolic umbilic canonical diffraction integral. Molecular Phys. 50 (6), pp. 1215–1230.
  • 20: 27.21 Tables
    β–ΊGlaisher (1940) contains four tables: Table I tabulates, for all n 10 4 : (a) the canonical factorization of n into powers of primes; (b) the Euler totient Ο• ⁑ ( n ) ; (c) the divisor function d ⁑ ( n ) ; (d) the sum Οƒ ⁑ ( n ) of these divisors. …