About the Project

OP%E2%80%99s

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

21—30 of 609 matching pages

21: 18.33 Polynomials Orthogonal on the Unit Circle
Simon (2005a, b) gives the general theory of these OPs in terms of monic OPs Φ n ( x ) , see §18.33(vi). …
§18.33(iii) Connection with OPs on the Line
Let { p n ( x ) } and { q n ( x ) } , n = 0 , 1 , , be OPs with weight functions w 1 ( x ) and w 2 ( x ) , respectively, on ( 1 , 1 ) . … Instead of (18.33.9) one might take monic OPs { q n ( x ) } with weight function ( 1 + x ) w 1 ( x ) , and then express q n ( 1 2 ( z + z 1 ) ) in terms of ϕ 2 n ( z ± 1 ) or ϕ 2 n + 1 ( z ± 1 ) . After a quadratic transformation (18.2.23) this would express OPs on [ 1 , 1 ] with an even orthogonality measure in terms of the ϕ n . …
22: 18.30 Associated OP’s
§18.30 Associated OPs
§18.30(vi) Corecursive Orthogonal Polynomials
Note that this is the same recurrence as in (18.2.8) for the traditional OPs, but with a different initialization. …
Associated Monic OPs
Relationship of Monic Corecursive and Monic Associated OPs
23: 18.9 Recurrence Relations and Derivatives
For the other classical OPs see Table 18.9.1; compare also §18.2(iv). … For the other classical OPs see Table 18.9.2. … For the monic versions of the classical OPs the recurrence coefficients b n and c n (there written as α n and β n , respectively) are given in §3.5(vi). They imply the recurrence coefficients for the orthonormal versions of the classical OPs as well, see again §3.5(vi). … The following three formulas change the degree but preserve the parameters, see (18.2.42)–(18.2.44) for similar formulas for more general OPs. …
24: 18.6 Symmetry, Special Values, and Limits to Monomials
18.6.1 L n ( α ) ( 0 ) = ( α + 1 ) n n ! .
Table 18.6.1: Classical OPs: symmetry and special values.
p n ( x ) p n ( x ) p n ( 1 ) p 2 n ( 0 ) p 2 n + 1 ( 0 )
25: DLMF Project News
error generating summary
26: 18.27 q -Hahn Class
The q -hypergeometric OPs comprise the q -Hahn class (or q -linear lattice class) OPs and the Askey–Wilson class (or q -quadratic lattice class) OPs18.28). … A (nonexhaustive) classification of such systems of OPs was made by Hahn (1949). There are 18 families of OPs of q -Hahn class. … All these systems of OPs have orthogonality properties of the form …Some of the systems of OPs that occur in the classification do not have a unique orthogonality property. …
27: 18.20 Hahn Class: Explicit Representations
Table 18.20.1: Krawtchouk, Meixner, and Charlier OPs: Rodrigues formulas (18.20.1).
p n ( x ) F ( x ) κ n
28: 18.5 Explicit Representations
18.5.5 p n ( x ) = 1 κ n w ( x ) d n d x n ( w ( x ) ( F ( x ) ) n ) .
Table 18.5.1: Classical OPs: Rodrigues formulas (18.5.5).
p n ( x ) w ( x ) F ( x ) κ n
U 6 ( x ) = 64 x 6 80 x 4 + 24 x 2 1 .
29: 18.28 Askey–Wilson Class
The Askey–Wilson class OPs comprise the four-parameter families of Askey–Wilson polynomials and of q -Racah polynomials, and cases of these families obtained by specialization of parameters. The Askey–Wilson polynomials form a system of OPs { p n ( x ) } , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , , that are orthogonal with respect to a weight function on a bounded interval, possibly supplemented with discrete weights on a finite set. … In the remainder of this section the Askey–Wilson class OPs are defined by their q -hypergeometric representations, followed by their orthogonal properties. … Leonard (1982) classified all (finite or infinite) discrete systems of OPs p n ( x ) on a set { x ( m ) } for which there is a system of discrete OPs q m ( y ) on a set { y ( n ) } such that p n ( x ( m ) ) = q m ( y ( n ) ) . … Bannai and Ito (1984) introduced OPs, called the Bannai–Ito polynomials which are the limit for q 1 of the q -Racah polynomials. …
30: 18.10 Integral Representations
Table 18.10.1: Classical OPs: contour integral representations (18.10.8).
p n ( x ) g 0 ( x ) g 1 ( z , x ) g 2 ( z , x ) c Conditions