About the Project

imaginary-argument%20transformations

AdvancedHelp

(0.005 seconds)

1—10 of 246 matching pages

1: 1.14 Integral Transforms
§1.14 Integral Transforms
§1.14(i) Fourier Transform
§1.14(iii) Laplace Transform
Fourier Transform
Laplace Transform
2: 10.1 Special Notation
For older notations see British Association for the Advancement of Science (1937, pp. xix–xx) and Watson (1944, Chapters 1–3).
3: 19.7 Connection Formulas
Reciprocal-Modulus Transformation
Imaginary-Modulus Transformation
Imaginary-Argument Transformation
For two further transformations of this type see Erdélyi et al. (1953b, p. 316). …
4: 8.6 Integral Representations
8.6.10 γ ( a , z ) = 1 2 π i c i c + i Γ ( s ) a s z a s d s , | ph z | < 1 2 π , a 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
8.6.12 Γ ( a , z ) = z a 1 e z Γ ( 1 a ) 1 2 π i c i c + i Γ ( s + 1 a ) π z s sin ( π s ) d s , | ph z | < 3 2 π , a 1 , 2 , 3 , .
5: 14.34 Software
  • Gil and Segura (1998). Integer parameters and purely imaginary arguments. Fortran.

  • 6: Bibliography B
  • G. Backenstoss (1970) Pionic atoms. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 20, pp. 467–508.
  • A. Bañuelos and R. A. Depine (1980) A program for computing the Riemann zeta function for complex argument. Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 441–445.
  • R. Barakat (1961) Evaluation of the incomplete gamma function of imaginary argument by Chebyshev polynomials. Math. Comp. 15 (73), pp. 7–11.
  • K. L. Bell and N. S. Scott (1980) Coulomb functions (negative energies). Comput. Phys. Comm. 20 (3), pp. 447–458.
  • W. G. Bickley (1935) Some solutions of the problem of forced convection. Philos. Mag. Series 7 20, pp. 322–343.
  • 7: 10.25 Definitions
    Its solutions are called modified Bessel functions or Bessel functions of imaginary argument. …
    8: 20 Theta Functions
    Chapter 20 Theta Functions
    9: 20.10 Integrals
    §20.10(i) Mellin Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
    20.10.1 0 x s 1 θ 2 ( 0 | i x 2 ) d x = 2 s ( 1 2 s ) π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 1 ,
    20.10.2 0 x s 1 ( θ 3 ( 0 | i x 2 ) 1 ) d x = π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 1 ,
    20.10.3 0 x s 1 ( 1 θ 4 ( 0 | i x 2 ) ) d x = ( 1 2 1 s ) π s / 2 Γ ( 1 2 s ) ζ ( s ) , s > 0 .
    §20.10(ii) Laplace Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
    10: Bibliography N
  • D. Naylor (1989) On an integral transform involving a class of Mathieu functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (6), pp. 1500–1513.
  • D. Naylor (1990) On an asymptotic expansion of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform. Applicable Anal. 39 (4), pp. 249–263.
  • D. Naylor (1996) On an asymptotic expansion of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform. Methods Appl. Anal. 3 (1), pp. 98–108.
  • W. J. Nellis and B. C. Carlson (1966) Reduction and evaluation of elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 223–231.
  • E. W. Ng and M. Geller (1969) A table of integrals of the error functions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect B. 73B, pp. 1–20.