About the Project

Dirichlet L-functions

AdvancedHelp

(0.004 seconds)

21—29 of 29 matching pages

21: Bibliography J
  • N. Joshi and A. V. Kitaev (2005) The Dirichlet boundary value problem for real solutions of the first Painlevé equation on segments in non-positive semi-axis. J. Reine Angew. Math. 583, pp. 29–86.
  • 22: Bibliography G
  • G. Gasper (1975) Formulas of the Dirichlet-Mehler Type. In Fractional Calculus and its Applications, B. Ross (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 457, pp. 207–215.
  • K. Girstmair (1990b) Dirichlet convolution of cotangent numbers and relative class number formulas. Monatsh. Math. 110 (3-4), pp. 231–256.
  • 23: 18.10 Integral Representations
    §18.10(i) Dirichlet–Mehler-Type Integral Representations
    24: 25.11 Hurwitz Zeta Function
    25.11.36Removed because it is just (25.15.1) combined with (25.15.3).
    25: Software Index
    26: 19.16 Definitions
    For generalizations and further information, especially representation of the R -function as a Dirichlet average, see Carlson (1977b). …
    27: Bibliography M
  • H. Maass (1971) Siegel’s modular forms and Dirichlet series. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 216, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • 28: 1.18 Linear Second Order Differential Operators and Eigenfunction Expansions
    §1.18(ii) L 2 spaces on intervals in
    For 𝒟 ( T ) we can take C 2 ( X ) , with appropriate boundary conditions, and with compact support if X is bounded, which space is dense in L 2 ( X ) , and for X unbounded require that possible non- L 2 eigenfunctions of (1.18.28), with real eigenvalues, are non-zero but bounded on open intervals, including ± . … The implicit boundary conditions taken here are that the ϕ n ( x ) and ϕ n ( x ) vanish as x ± , which in this case is equivalent to requiring ϕ n ( x ) L 2 ( X ) , see Pauling and Wilson (1985, pp. 67–82) for a discussion of this latter point. … Eigenfunctions corresponding to the continuous spectrum are non- L 2 functions. … The well must be deep and broad enough to allow existence of such L 2 discrete states. …
    29: Errata
  • Section 27.11

    Immediately below (27.11.2), the bound θ 0 for Dirichlet’s divisor problem (currently still unsolved) has been changed from 12 37 Kolesnik (1969) to 131 416 Huxley (2003).

  • Equation (25.15.10)
    25.15.10 L ( 0 , χ ) = { 1 k r = 1 k 1 r χ ( r ) , χ χ 1 , 0 , χ = χ 1 .

    The upper-index of the finite sum which originally was k , was replaced with k 1 since χ ( k ) = 0 .

    Reported by Gergő Nemes on 2021-08-23

  • Equation (25.11.36)

    We have emphasized the link with the Dirichlet L -function, and used the fact that χ ( k ) = 0 . A sentence just below (25.11.36) was added indicating that one should make a comparison with (25.15.1) and (25.15.3).