About the Project

relation to Hurwitz zeta function

AdvancedHelp

(0.005 seconds)

11—13 of 13 matching pages

11: Bibliography M
  • B. Markman (1965) Contribution no. 14. The Riemann zeta function. BIT 5, pp. 138–141.
  • F. Matta and A. Reichel (1971) Uniform computation of the error function and other related functions. Math. Comp. 25 (114), pp. 339–344.
  • G. J. Miel (1981) Evaluation of complex logarithms and related functions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18 (4), pp. 744–750.
  • J. Miller and V. S. Adamchik (1998) Derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta function for rational arguments. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 100 (2), pp. 201–206.
  • S. C. Milne (1985c) A new symmetry related to 𝑆𝑈 ( n ) for classical basic hypergeometric series. Adv. in Math. 57 (1), pp. 71–90.
  • 12: Bibliography R
  • W. P. Reinhardt (2021a) Erratum to:Relationships between the zeros, weights, and weight functions of orthogonal polynomials: Derivative rule approach to Stieltjes and spectral imaging. Computing in Science and Engineering 23 (4), pp. 91.
  • W. P. Reinhardt (2021b) Relationships between the zeros, weights, and weight functions of orthogonal polynomials: Derivative rule approach to Stieltjes and spectral imaging. Computing in Science and Engineering 23 (3), pp. 56–64.
  • R. Reynolds and A. Stauffer (2021) Infinite Sum of the Incomplete Gamma Function Expressed in Terms of the Hurwitz Zeta Function. Mathematics 9 (16).
  • R. Roy (2017) Elliptic and modular functions from Gauss to Dedekind to Hecke. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • J. Rushchitsky and S. Rushchitska (2000) On Simple Waves with Profiles in the form of some Special Functions—Chebyshev-Hermite, Mathieu, Whittaker—in Two-phase Media. In Differential Operators and Related Topics, Vol. I (Odessa, 1997), Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Vol. 117, pp. 313–322.
  • 13: Errata
  • Source citations

    Specific source citations and proof metadata are now given for all equations in Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions.

  • Chapters 14 Legendre and Related Functions, 15 Hypergeometric Function

    The Gegenbauer function C α ( λ ) ( z ) , was labeled inadvertently as the ultraspherical (Gegenbauer) polynomial C n ( λ ) ( z ) . In order to resolve this inconsistency, this function now links correctly to its definition. This change affects Gegenbauer functions which appear in §§14.3(iv), 15.9(iii).

  • Equation (19.25.37)

    The Weierstrass zeta function was incorrectly linked to the definition of the Riemann zeta function. However, to the eye, the function appeared correct. The link was corrected.

  • Equations (25.11.6), (25.11.19), and (25.11.20)

    Originally all six integrands in these equations were incorrect because their numerators contained the function B ~ 2 ( x ) . The correct function is B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 2 . The new equations are:

    25.11.6 ζ ( s , a ) = 1 a s ( 1 2 + a s 1 ) s ( s + 1 ) 2 0 B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ( x + a ) s + 2 d x , s 1 , s > 1 , a > 0

    Reported 2016-05-08 by Clemens Heuberger.

    25.11.19 ζ ( s , a ) = ln a a s ( 1 2 + a s 1 ) a 1 s ( s 1 ) 2 + s ( s + 1 ) 2 0 ( B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ) ln ( x + a ) ( x + a ) s + 2 d x ( 2 s + 1 ) 2 0 B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ( x + a ) s + 2 d x , s > 1 , s 1 , a > 0

    Reported 2016-06-27 by Gergő Nemes.

    25.11.20 ( 1 ) k ζ ( k ) ( s , a ) = ( ln a ) k a s ( 1 2 + a s 1 ) + k ! a 1 s r = 0 k 1 ( ln a ) r r ! ( s 1 ) k r + 1 s ( s + 1 ) 2 0 ( B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ) ( ln ( x + a ) ) k ( x + a ) s + 2 d x + k ( 2 s + 1 ) 2 0 ( B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ) ( ln ( x + a ) ) k 1 ( x + a ) s + 2 d x k ( k 1 ) 2 0 ( B ~ 2 ( x ) B 2 ) ( ln ( x + a ) ) k 2 ( x + a ) s + 2 d x , s > 1 , s 1 , a > 0

    Reported 2016-06-27 by Gergő Nemes.

  • Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions

    A number of additions and changes have been made to the metadata to reflect new and changed references as well as to how some equations have been derived.