About the Project

ninej symbols

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

11—15 of 15 matching pages

11: 16.7 Relations to Other Functions
For 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols see Chapter 34. …
12: 34 3j, 6j, 9j Symbols
Chapter 34 3 j , 6 j , 9 j Symbols
13: 16.4 Argument Unity
See Raynal (1979) for a statement in terms of 3 j symbols (Chapter 34). …
14: 34.3 Basic Properties: 3 j Symbol
Similar conventions apply to all subsequent summations in this chapter.
15: Errata
  • Section 34.1

    The relation between Clebsch-Gordan and 3 j symbols was clarified, and the sign of m 3 was changed for readability. The reference Condon and Shortley (1935) for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959) and the references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise in §34.1.

  • Section 34.1

    The reference for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Condon and Shortley (1935), was replaced by Edmonds (1974) and Rotenberg et al. (1959). The references for 3 j , 6 j , 9 j symbols were made more precise.

  • Equation (34.7.4)
    34.7.4 ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = m r 1 , m r 2 , r = 1 , 2 , 3 ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 )

    Originally the third 3 j symbol in the summation was written incorrectly as ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) .

    Reported 2015-01-19 by Yan-Rui Liu.