with respect to integration

SearchAdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

1—10 of 62 matching pages

1: 19.13 Integrals of Elliptic Integrals

… ►

§19.13(i) Integration with Respect to the Modulus

… ►

§19.13(ii) Integration with Respect to the Amplitude

…

2: 1.1 Special Notation

… ► ►►►

$x,y$	real variables.
…
$L^2(X,d\alpha )$	the space of all Lebesgue–Stieltjes measurable functions on $X$ which are square integrable with respect to $d\alpha$.
…

…

3: 18.3 Definitions

… ►

Table 18.3.1: Orthogonality properties for classical OP’s: intervals, weight functions, standardizations, leading coefficients, and parameter constraints. …

► ►►

Name	$p_n(x)$	$(a,b)$	$w(x)$	$h_n$	$k_n$	${\tilde{k}}_n/k_n$	Constraints
…

►

…

4: 3.11 Approximation Techniques

… ►They enjoy an orthogonal property with respect to integrals: …

5: 1.4 Calculus of One Variable

… ►Stieltjes integrability for $f$ with respect to $\alpha$ can be defined similarly as Riemann integrability in the case that $\alpha (x)$ is differentiable with respect to $x$; a generalization follows below. … ►Similarly the Stieltjes integral can be generalized to a Lebesgue–Stieltjes integral with respect to the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $d\mu (x)$ and it is well defined for functions $f$ which are integrable with respect to that more general measure. … ►

1.4.23_2 $${\int }_a^{b}f(x)d\alpha (x)={\int }_a^{b}f(x)w(x)dx,$$ $f$ integrable with respectto $d\alpha$.

ⓘ

Symbols:

$dx$: differential of $x$ , $\int$: integral and $w(x)$: weight function

Referenced by:

§1.4(v)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/1.4.E23_2

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Addition (effective with 1.2.0):

This equation was added.

See also:

Annotations for §1.4(v), §1.4(v), §1.4 and Ch.1

…

6: 1.18 Linear Second Order Differential Operators and Eigenfunction Expansions

… ►For a Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure $d\alpha$ on $X$ let $L^2(X,d\alpha )$ be the space of all Lebesgue–Stieltjes measurable complex-valued functions on $X$ which are square integrable with respect to $d\alpha$, …

7: 36.2 Catastrophes and Canonical Integrals

… ►with the contour passing to the lower right of $u=0$. …with the contour passing to the upper right of $u=0$. … ► ${\mathrm{\Psi }}_1$ is related to the Airy function (§9.2): … … ►Addendum: For further special cases see §36.2(iv) …

8: 20.10 Integrals

… ►

§20.10(i) Mellin Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter

►

20.10.1 $${\int }_0^{\mathrm{\infty }}{x}^{s-1}{\theta }_2\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2)dx=2^s(1-2^{-s}){\pi }^{-s/2}\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(\frac{1}{2}s\right)\zeta \left(s\right),$$ $\mathrm{\Re }s>1$,

ⓘ

Symbols:

$\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(z\right)$: gamma function, ${\theta }_j\left(z\right|\tau )$: theta function, $\zeta \left(s\right)$: Riemann zeta function, $\pi$: the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, $dx$: differential of $x$ , $\mathrm{i}$: imaginary unit, $\int$: integral and $\mathrm{\Re }$: real part

Keywords:

Mellin transform

Referenced by:

§20.10(i), Erratum (V1.1.5) for §20.10(i)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/20.10.E1

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Modification (effective with 1.1.5):

Originally the constraint was $\mathrm{\Re }s>2$. This can be relaxed to $\mathrm{\Re }s>1$ because ${\theta }_2\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2)=x^{-1}{\theta }_4\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^{-2})\sim x^{-1}$ as $x\to 0+$, which follows from (20.7.31) and (20.4.5).

See also:

Annotations for §20.10(i), §20.10 and Ch.20

►

20.10.2 $${\int }_0^{\mathrm{\infty }}{x}^{s-1}({\theta }_3\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2)-1)dx={\pi }^{-s/2}\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(\frac{1}{2}s\right)\zeta \left(s\right),$$ $\mathrm{\Re }s>1$,

ⓘ

Symbols:

$\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(z\right)$: gamma function, ${\theta }_j\left(z\right|\tau )$: theta function, $\zeta \left(s\right)$: Riemann zeta function, $\pi$: the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, $dx$: differential of $x$ , $\mathrm{i}$: imaginary unit, $\int$: integral and $\mathrm{\Re }$: real part

Keywords:

Mellin transform

Referenced by:

§20.10(i), Erratum (V1.1.5) for §20.10(i)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/20.10.E2

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Modification (effective with 1.1.5):

Originally the constraint was $\mathrm{\Re }s>2$. This can be relaxed to $\mathrm{\Re }s>1$ because ${\theta }_3\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2)=x^{-1}{\theta }_3\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^{-2})\sim x^{-1}$ as $x\to 0+$, which follows from (20.7.32) and (20.4.4).

See also:

Annotations for §20.10(i), §20.10 and Ch.20

►

20.10.3 $${\int }_0^{\mathrm{\infty }}{x}^{s-1}(1-{\theta }_4\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2))dx=(1-2^{1-s}){\pi }^{-s/2}\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(\frac{1}{2}s\right)\zeta \left(s\right),$$ $\mathrm{\Re }s>0$.

ⓘ

Symbols:

$\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(z\right)$: gamma function, ${\theta }_j\left(z\right|\tau )$: theta function, $\zeta \left(s\right)$: Riemann zeta function, $\pi$: the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, $dx$: differential of $x$ , $\mathrm{i}$: imaginary unit, $\int$: integral and $\mathrm{\Re }$: real part

Keywords:

Mellin transform

Referenced by:

§20.10(i), Erratum (V1.1.5) for §20.10(i)

Permalink:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/20.10.E3

Encodings:

pMML, png, TeX

Modification (effective with 1.1.5):

Originally the constraint was $\mathrm{\Re }s>2$. This can be relaxed to $\mathrm{\Re }s>0$ because $1-{\theta }_4\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^2)=1-x^{-1}{\theta }_2\left(0\right|\mathrm{i}{x}^{-2})\sim 1$ as $x\to 0+$, which follows from (20.7.33) and (20.4.3).

See also:

Annotations for §20.10(i), §20.10 and Ch.20

… ►

§20.10(ii) Laplace Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter

…

9: 18.18 Sums

… ►In all three cases of Jacobi, Laguerre and Hermite, if $f(x)$ is $L^2$ on the corresponding interval with respect to the corresponding weight function and if $a_n,b_n,d_n$ are given by (18.18.1), (18.18.5), (18.18.7), respectively, then the respective series expansions (18.18.2), (18.18.4), (18.18.6) are valid with the sums converging in $L^2$ sense. …

10: 1.17 Integral and Series Representations of the Dirac Delta

… ►In the language of physics and applied mathematics, these equations indicate the normalizations chosen for these non-$L^2$ improper eigenfunctions of the differential operators (with derivatives respect to spatial co-ordinates) which generate them; the normalizations (1.17.12_1) and (1.17.12_2) are explicitly derived in Friedman (1990, Ch. 4), the others follow similarly. …