About the Project

representations by Euler–Maclaurin formula

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

10 matching pages

1: 25.2 Definition and Expansions
§25.2(iii) Representations by the EulerMaclaurin Formula
2: 25.11 Hurwitz Zeta Function
§25.11(iii) Representations by the EulerMaclaurin Formula
3: Errata
  • Chapter 1 Additions

    The following additions were made in Chapter 1:

  • Expansion

    §4.13 has been enlarged. The Lambert W -function is multi-valued and we use the notation W k ( x ) , k , for the branches. The original two solutions are identified via Wp ( x ) = W 0 ( x ) and Wm ( x ) = W ± 1 ( x 0 i ) .

    Other changes are the introduction of the Wright ω -function and tree T -function in (4.13.1_2) and (4.13.1_3), simplification formulas (4.13.3_1) and (4.13.3_2), explicit representation (4.13.4_1) for d n W d z n , additional Maclaurin series (4.13.5_1) and (4.13.5_2), an explicit expansion about the branch point at z = e 1 in (4.13.9_1), extending the number of terms in asymptotic expansions (4.13.10) and (4.13.11), and including several integrals and integral representations for Lambert W -functions in the end of the section.

  • Paragraph Inversion Formula (in §35.2)

    The wording was changed to make the integration variable more apparent.

  • Equations (15.6.1)–(15.6.9)

    The Olver hypergeometric function 𝐅 ( a , b ; c ; z ) , previously omitted from the left-hand sides to make the formulas more concise, has been added. In Equations (15.6.1)–(15.6.5), (15.6.7)–(15.6.9), the constraint | ph ( 1 z ) | < π has been added. In (15.6.6), the constraint | ph ( z ) | < π has been added. In Section 15.6 Integral Representations, the sentence immediately following (15.6.9), “These representations are valid when | ph ( 1 z ) | < π , except (15.6.6) which holds for | ph ( z ) | < π .”, has been removed.

  • Equation (5.11.8)

    It was reported by Nico Temme on 2015-02-28 that the asymptotic formula for Ln Γ ( z + h ) is valid for h ( ) ; originally it was unnecessarily restricted to [ 0 , 1 ] .

  • 4: Bibliography E
  • G. P. Egorychev (1984) Integral Representation and the Computation of Combinatorial Sums. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 59, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
  • D. Elliott (1998) The Euler-Maclaurin formula revisited. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 40 (E), pp. E27–E76 (electronic).
  • T. Estermann (1959) On the representations of a number as a sum of three squares. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 9, pp. 575–594.
  • L. Euler (1768) Institutiones Calculi Integralis. Opera Omnia (1), Vol. 11, pp. 110–113.
  • J. A. Ewell (1990) A new series representation for ζ ( 3 ) . Amer. Math. Monthly 97 (3), pp. 219–220.
  • 5: Bibliography B
  • Á. Baricz and T. K. Pogány (2013) Integral representations and summations of the modified Struve function. Acta Math. Hungar. 141 (3), pp. 254–281.
  • W. Barrett (1981) Mathieu functions of general order: Connection formulae, base functions and asymptotic formulae. I–V. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 301, pp. 75–162.
  • B. C. Berndt (1975a) Character analogues of the Poisson and Euler-MacLaurin summation formulas with applications. J. Number Theory 7 (4), pp. 413–445.
  • B. C. Berndt (1975b) Periodic Bernoulli numbers, summation formulas and applications. In Theory and Application of Special Functions (Proc. Advanced Sem., Math. Res. Center, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., 1975), pp. 143–189.
  • P. L. Butzer and M. Hauss (1992) Riemann zeta function: Rapidly converging series and integral representations. Appl. Math. Lett. 5 (2), pp. 83–88.
  • 6: 9.12 Scorer Functions
    where …
    §9.12(v) Connection Formulas
    §9.12(vi) Maclaurin Series
    §9.12(vii) Integral Representations
    7: Bibliography F
  • P. Flajolet and B. Salvy (1998) Euler sums and contour integral representations. Experiment. Math. 7 (1), pp. 15–35.
  • J. P. M. Flude (1998) The Edmonds asymptotic formulas for the 3 j and 6 j symbols. J. Math. Phys. 39 (7), pp. 3906–3915.
  • W. B. Ford (1960) Studies on Divergent Series and Summability & The Asymptotic Developments of Functions Defined by Maclaurin Series. Chelsea Publishing Co., New York.
  • G. Freud (1976) On the coefficients in the recursion formulae of orthogonal polynomials. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A 76 (1), pp. 1–6.
  • 8: 13.29 Methods of Computation
    Although the Maclaurin series expansion (13.2.2) converges for all finite values of z , it is cumbersome to use when | z | is large owing to slowness of convergence and cancellation. … For U ( a , b , z ) and W κ , μ ( z ) we may integrate along outward rays from the origin in the sectors 1 2 π < | ph z | < 3 2 π , with initial values obtained from connection formulas in §13.2(vii), §13.14(vii). …
    §13.29(iii) Integral Representations
    The integral representations (13.4.1) and (13.4.4) can be used to compute the Kummer functions, and (13.16.1) and (13.16.5) for the Whittaker functions. …
    13.29.8 w ( n ) π e 1 2 z z 1 4 ( 4 a 2 b + 1 ) Γ ( a ) Γ ( a + 1 b ) n 1 4 ( 4 a 2 b 3 ) e 2 n z ,
    9: Bibliography H
  • B. Hall (2015) Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representations. Second edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 222, Springer, Cham.
  • M. Hauss (1997) An Euler-Maclaurin-type formula involving conjugate Bernoulli polynomials and an application to ζ ( 2 m + 1 ) . Commun. Appl. Anal. 1 (1), pp. 15–32.
  • M. Hauss (1998) A Boole-type Formula involving Conjugate Euler Polynomials. In Charlemagne and his Heritage. 1200 Years of Civilization and Science in Europe, Vol. 2 (Aachen, 1995), P.L. Butzer, H. Th. Jongen, and W. Oberschelp (Eds.), pp. 361–375.
  • K. Horata (1989) An explicit formula for Bernoulli numbers. Rep. Fac. Sci. Technol. Meijo Univ. 29, pp. 1–6.
  • F. T. Howard (1996a) Explicit formulas for degenerate Bernoulli numbers. Discrete Math. 162 (1-3), pp. 175–185.
  • 10: 18.17 Integrals
    §18.17(ii) Integral Representations for Products
    Ultraspherical
    Legendre
    For addition formulas corresponding to (18.17.5) and (18.17.6) see (18.18.8) and (18.18.9), respectively. … Formulas (18.17.45) and (18.17.49) are integrated forms of the linearization formulas (18.18.22) and (18.18.23), respectively. …