About the Project

relation to minimax polynomials

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

21—30 of 916 matching pages

21: Mourad E. H. Ismail
Ismail has published numerous papers on special functions, orthogonal polynomials, approximation theory, combinatorics, asymptotics, and related topics. His well-known book Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable was published by Cambridge University Press in 2005 and reprinted with corrections in paperback in Ismail (2009). …  190, American Mathematical Society, 1995; Special Functions, q -Series and Related Topics (with D. … Garvan), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001; and Theory and Applications of Special Functions: A volume dedicated to Mizan Rahman (with E. …
22: 7.24 Approximations
  • Hastings (1955) gives several minimax polynomial and rational approximations for erf x , erfc x and the auxiliary functions f ( x ) and g ( x ) .

  • Cody (1969) provides minimax rational approximations for erf x and erfc x . The maximum relative precision is about 20S.

  • Cody (1968) gives minimax rational approximations for the Fresnel integrals (maximum relative precision 19S); for a Fortran algorithm and comments see Snyder (1993).

  • Cody et al. (1970) gives minimax rational approximations to Dawson’s integral F ( x ) (maximum relative precision 20S–22S).

  • Luke (1969b, pp. 323–324) covers 1 2 π erf x and e x 2 F ( x ) for 3 x 3 (the Chebyshev coefficients are given to 20D); π x e x 2 erfc x and 2 x F ( x ) for x 3 (the Chebyshev coefficients are given to 20D and 15D, respectively). Coefficients for the Fresnel integrals are given on pp. 328–330 (20D).

  • 23: 19.38 Approximations
    Minimax polynomial approximations (§3.11(i)) for K ( k ) and E ( k ) in terms of m = k 2 with 0 m < 1 can be found in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, §17.3) with maximum absolute errors ranging from 4×10⁻⁵ to 2×10⁻⁸. Approximations of the same type for K ( k ) and E ( k ) for 0 < k 1 are given in Cody (1965a) with maximum absolute errors ranging from 4×10⁻⁵ to 4×10⁻¹⁸. … The accuracy is controlled by the number of terms retained in the approximation; for real variables the number of significant figures appears to be roughly twice the number of terms retained, perhaps even for ϕ near π / 2 with the improvements made in the 1970 reference. …
    24: 15.9 Relations to Other Functions
    §15.9 Relations to Other Functions
    §15.9(i) Orthogonal Polynomials
    Jacobi
    Legendre
    Meixner
    25: 7.10 Derivatives
    §7.10 Derivatives
    7.10.1 d n + 1 erf z d z n + 1 = ( 1 ) n 2 π H n ( z ) e z 2 , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
    For the Hermite polynomial H n ( z ) see §18.3.
    7.10.2 w ( z ) = 2 z w ( z ) + ( 2 i / π ) ,
    26: 24.4 Basic Properties
    §24.4(ii) Symmetry
    Next, …
    §24.4(vii) Derivatives
    §24.4(ix) Relations to Other Functions
    For the relation of Bernoulli numbers to the Riemann zeta function see §25.6, and to the Eulerian numbers see (26.14.11).
    27: 18.5 Explicit Representations
    Chebyshev
    Related formula: …
    §18.5(iii) Finite Power Series, the Hypergeometric Function, and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
    Laguerre
    Hermite
    28: 29 Lamé Functions
    29: 18.11 Relations to Other Functions
    §18.11 Relations to Other Functions
    See §§18.5(i) and 18.5(iii) for relations to trigonometric functions, the hypergeometric function, and generalized hypergeometric functions.
    Ultraspherical
    Laguerre
    Hermite
    30: 18.21 Hahn Class: Interrelations
    §18.21(ii) Limit Relations and Special Cases
    Hahn Jacobi
    Meixner Laguerre
    Charlier Hermite
    Meixner–Pollaczek Laguerre