About the Project

method%20of%20steepest%20descents

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—20 of 224 matching pages

11: 28 Mathieu Functions and Hill’s Equation
12: Bibliography I
  • L. Infeld and T. E. Hull (1951) The factorization method. Rev. Modern Phys. 23 (1), pp. 21–68.
  • K. Inkeri (1959) The real roots of Bernoulli polynomials. Ann. Univ. Turku. Ser. A I 37, pp. 1–20.
  • M. E. H. Ismail and E. Koelink (2011) The J -matrix method. Adv. in Appl. Math. 46 (1-4), pp. 379–395.
  • A. R. Its, A. S. Fokas, and A. A. Kapaev (1994) On the asymptotic analysis of the Painlevé equations via the isomonodromy method. Nonlinearity 7 (5), pp. 1291–1325.
  • A. R. Its and V. Yu. Novokshënov (1986) The Isomonodromic Deformation Method in the Theory of Painlevé Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1191, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • 13: 8.26 Tables
  • Khamis (1965) tabulates P ( a , x ) for a = 0.05 ( .05 ) 10 ( .1 ) 20 ( .25 ) 70 , 0.0001 x 250 to 10D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, pp. 245–248) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 to 7D; also ( x + n ) e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x 1 = 0 ( .01 ) 0.1 ( .05 ) 0.5 to 6S.

  • Pagurova (1961) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 ( .1 ) 10 to 4-9S; e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 ( 1 ) 10 , x = 10 ( .1 ) 20 to 7D; e x E p ( x ) for p = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 7 ( .05 ) 12 ( .1 ) 20 to 7S or 7D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, Table 19.1) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 15 , 20 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , 1.5 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 50 , 100 to 7D or 8S.

  • 14: 23 Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular
    Functions
    15: Bibliography N
  • National Physical Laboratory (1961) Modern Computing Methods. 2nd edition, Notes on Applied Science, No. 16, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
  • D. Naylor (1989) On an integral transform involving a class of Mathieu functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (6), pp. 1500–1513.
  • W. J. Nellis and B. C. Carlson (1966) Reduction and evaluation of elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 223–231.
  • G. Nemes (2020) An extension of Laplace’s method. Constr. Approx. 51 (2), pp. 247–272.
  • E. W. Ng and M. Geller (1969) A table of integrals of the error functions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect B. 73B, pp. 1–20.
  • 16: Bibliography K
  • R. B. Kearfott, M. Dawande, K. Du, and C. Hu (1994) Algorithm 737: INTLIB: A portable Fortran 77 interval standard-function library. ACM Trans. Math. Software 20 (4), pp. 447–459.
  • M. K. Kerimov (1980) Methods of computing the Riemann zeta-function and some generalizations of it. USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 20 (6), pp. 212–230.
  • A. V. Kitaev and A. H. Vartanian (2004) Connection formulae for asymptotics of solutions of the degenerate third Painlevé equation. I. Inverse Problems 20 (4), pp. 1165–1206.
  • T. H. Koornwinder (2009) The Askey scheme as a four-manifold with corners. Ramanujan J. 20 (3), pp. 409–439.
  • C. Krattenthaler (1993) HYP and HYPQ. Mathematica packages for the manipulation of binomial sums and hypergeometric series respectively q -binomial sums and basic hypergeometric series. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 30, pp. 61–76.
  • 17: 36 Integrals with Coalescing Saddles
    18: Gergő Nemes
    As of September 20, 2021, Nemes performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions. …
    19: Wolter Groenevelt
    As of September 20, 2022, Groenevelt performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 18 Orthogonal Polynomials. …
    20: 34.9 Graphical Method
    §34.9 Graphical Method
    The graphical method establishes a one-to-one correspondence between an analytic expression and a diagram by assigning a graphical symbol to each function and operation of the analytic expression. …For an account of this method see Brink and Satchler (1993, Chapter VII). For specific examples of the graphical method of representing sums involving the 3 j , 6 j , and 9 j symbols, see Varshalovich et al. (1988, Chapters 11, 12) and Lehman and O’Connell (1973, §3.3).