About the Project

hyperbolic%20functions

AdvancedHelp

(0.004 seconds)

1—10 of 14 matching pages

1: 20.10 Integrals
§20.10 Integrals
§20.10(i) Mellin Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
Here ζ ( s ) again denotes the Riemann zeta function25.2). …
§20.10(ii) Laplace Transforms with respect to the Lattice Parameter
For corresponding results for argument derivatives of the theta functions see Erdélyi et al. (1954a, pp. 224–225) or Oberhettinger and Badii (1973, p. 193). …
2: Bibliography B
  • S. Bochner (1952) Bessel functions and modular relations of higher type and hyperbolic differential equations. Comm. Sém. Math. Univ. Lund [Medd. Lunds Univ. Mat. Sem.] 1952 (Tome Supplementaire), pp. 12–20.
  • 3: 36.2 Catastrophes and Canonical Integrals
    36.2.29 Ψ ( H ) ( 0 , 0 , z ) = Ψ ( H ) ( 0 , 0 , z ) ¯ = 2 1 / 3 3 exp ( 1 27 i z 3 ) Ψ ( E ) ( 0 , 0 , z 2 2 / 3 ) , < z < .
    4: 7.8 Inequalities
    §7.8 Inequalities
    7.8.5 x 2 2 x 2 + 1 x 2 ( 2 x 2 + 5 ) 4 x 4 + 12 x 2 + 3 x 𝖬 ( x ) < 2 x 4 + 9 x 2 + 4 4 x 4 + 20 x 2 + 15 < x 2 + 1 2 x 2 + 3 , x 0 .
    7.8.7 sinh x 2 x < e x 2 F ( x ) = 0 x e t 2 d t < e x 2 1 x , x > 0 .
    The function F ( x ) / 1 e 2 x 2 is strictly decreasing for x > 0 . …
    7.8.8 erf x < 1 e 4 x 2 / π , x > 0 .
    5: Bibliography F
  • FDLIBM (free C library)
  • S. Fempl (1960) Sur certaines sommes des intégral-cosinus. Bull. Soc. Math. Phys. Serbie 12, pp. 13–20 (French).
  • H. E. Fettis and J. C. Caslin (1964) Tables of Elliptic Integrals of the First, Second, and Third Kind. Technical report Technical Report ARL 64-232, Aerospace Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
  • C. L. Frenzen (1990) Error bounds for a uniform asymptotic expansion of the Legendre function Q n m ( cosh z ) . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21 (2), pp. 523–535.
  • G. Freud (1969) On weighted polynomial approximation on the whole real axis. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 20, pp. 223–225.
  • 6: 36.4 Bifurcation Sets
    x = 9 20 z 2 .
    x = 3 20 z 2 ,
    Hyperbolic umbilic bifurcation set (codimension three): … Hyperbolic umbilic cusp line (rib): …
    §36.4(ii) Visualizations
    7: Bibliography M
  • A. J. MacLeod (1996b) Rational approximations, software and test methods for sine and cosine integrals. Numer. Algorithms 12 (3-4), pp. 259–272.
  • W. Magnus and S. Winkler (1966) Hill’s Equation. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 20, Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, New York-London-Sydney.
  • Fr. Mechel (1966) Calculation of the modified Bessel functions of the second kind with complex argument. Math. Comp. 20 (95), pp. 407–412.
  • R. Metzler, J. Klafter, and J. Jortner (1999) Hierarchies and logarithmic oscillations in the temporal relaxation patterns of proteins and other complex systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U .S. A. 96 (20), pp. 11085–11089.
  • D. S. Moak (1981) The q -analogue of the Laguerre polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 81 (1), pp. 20–47.
  • 8: Errata
  • Figures 36.3.9, 36.3.10, 36.3.11, 36.3.12

    Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.9: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.10: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.11: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) | .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Density plot. (b) 3D plot.

    Figure 36.3.12: Modulus of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral function | Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) | .

    Reported 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi.

  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval 8.4 x y 2 8.4 was replaced by 12.0 x y 2 12.0 and 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • Chapters 8, 20, 36

    Several new equations have been added. See (8.17.24), (20.7.34), §20.11(v), (26.12.27), (36.2.28), and (36.2.29).

  • Table 22.5.4

    Originally the limiting form for sc ( z , k ) in the last line of this table was incorrect ( cosh z , instead of sinh z ).

    sn ( z , k ) tanh z cd ( z , k ) 1 dc ( z , k ) 1 ns ( z , k ) coth z
    cn ( z , k ) sech z sd ( z , k ) sinh z nc ( z , k ) cosh z ds ( z , k ) csch z
    dn ( z , k ) sech z nd ( z , k ) cosh z sc ( z , k ) sinh z cs ( z , k ) csch z

    Reported 2010-11-23.

  • References

    Bibliographic citations were added in §§1.13(v), 10.14, 10.21(ii), 18.15(v), 18.32, 30.16(iii), 32.13(ii), and as general references in Chapters 19, 20, 22, and 23.

  • 9: Software Index
    Open Source With Book Commercial
    20 Theta Functions
    ‘✓’ indicates that a software package implements the functions in a section; ‘a’ indicates available functionality through optional or add-on packages; an empty space indicates no known support. … In the list below we identify four main sources of software for computing special functions. …
  • Commercial Software.

    Such software ranges from a collection of reusable software parts (e.g., a library) to fully functional interactive computing environments with an associated computing language. Such software is usually professionally developed, tested, and maintained to high standards. It is available for purchase, often with accompanying updates and consulting support.

  • The following are web-based software repositories with significant holdings in the area of special functions. …
    10: 19.36 Methods of Computation
    When the differences are moderately small, the iteration is stopped, the elementary symmetric functions of certain differences are calculated, and a polynomial consisting of a fixed number of terms of the sum in (19.19.7) is evaluated. …where the elementary symmetric functions E s are defined by (19.19.4). … The step from n to n + 1 is an ascending Landen transformation if θ = 1 (leading ultimately to a hyperbolic case of R C ) or a descending Gauss transformation if θ = 1 (leading to a circular case of R C ). …
    §19.36(iii) Via Theta Functions
    For computation of Legendre’s integral of the third kind, see Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, §§17.7 and 17.8, Examples 15, 17, 19, and 20). …