About the Project

general%20case

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

10 matching pages

1: Bibliography S
  • K. L. Sala (1989) Transformations of the Jacobian amplitude function and its calculation via the arithmetic-geometric mean. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (6), pp. 1514–1528.
  • A. Sharples (1967) Uniform asymptotic forms of modified Mathieu functions. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 20 (3), pp. 365–380.
  • F. C. Smith (1939b) Relations among the fundamental solutions of the generalized hypergeometric equation when p = q + 1 . II. Logarithmic cases. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (12), pp. 927–935.
  • J. R. Stembridge (1995) A Maple package for symmetric functions. J. Symbolic Comput. 20 (5-6), pp. 755–768.
  • F. Stenger (1966b) Error bounds for asymptotic solutions of differential equations. II. The general case. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect. B 70B, pp. 187–210.
  • 2: 20.7 Identities
    See Lawden (1989, pp. 19–20). … These are specific examples of modular transformations as discussed in §23.15; the corresponding results for the general case are given by Rademacher (1973, pp. 181–183). …
    20.7.34 θ 1 ( z , q 2 ) θ 3 ( z , q 2 ) θ 1 ( z , i q ) = θ 2 ( z , q 2 ) θ 4 ( z , q 2 ) θ 2 ( z , i q ) = i 1 / 4 θ 2 ( 0 , q 2 ) θ 4 ( 0 , q 2 ) 2 .
    3: 28.35 Tables
  • Blanch and Clemm (1965) includes values of Mc n ( 2 ) ( x , q ) , Mc n ( 2 ) ( x , q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 7 , x = 0 ( .02 ) 1 ; n = 8 ( 1 ) 15 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 1 . Also Ms n ( 2 ) ( x , q ) , Ms n ( 2 ) ( x , q ) for n = 1 ( 1 ) 7 , x = 0 ( .02 ) 1 ; n = 8 ( 1 ) 15 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 1 . In all cases q = 0 ( .05 ) 1 . Precision is generally 7D. Approximate formulas and graphs are also included.

  • Ince (1932) includes eigenvalues a n , b n , and Fourier coefficients for n = 0 or 1 ( 1 ) 6 , q = 0 ( 1 ) 10 ( 2 ) 20 ( 4 ) 40 ; 7D. Also ce n ( x , q ) , se n ( x , q ) for q = 0 ( 1 ) 10 , x = 1 ( 1 ) 90 , corresponding to the eigenvalues in the tables; 5D. Notation: a n = 𝑏𝑒 n 2 q , b n = 𝑏𝑜 n 2 q .

  • Kirkpatrick (1960) contains tables of the modified functions Ce n ( x , q ) , Se n + 1 ( x , q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 5 , q = 1 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0.1 ( .1 ) 1 ; 4D or 5D.

  • National Bureau of Standards (1967) includes the eigenvalues a n ( q ) , b n ( q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 3 with q = 0 ( .2 ) 20 ( .5 ) 37 ( 1 ) 100 , and n = 4 ( 1 ) 15 with q = 0 ( 2 ) 100 ; Fourier coefficients for ce n ( x , q ) and se n ( x , q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 15 , n = 1 ( 1 ) 15 , respectively, and various values of q in the interval [ 0 , 100 ] ; joining factors g e , n ( q ) , f e , n ( q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 15 with q = 0 ( .5  to  10 ) 100 (but in a different notation). Also, eigenvalues for large values of q . Precision is generally 8D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, pp. 521–532) includes the eigenvalues a n ( q ) , b n + 1 ( q ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 4 , q = 0 ( 1 ) 50 ; n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 ( a ’s) or 19 ( b ’s), q = 1 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 15 , 25 , 50 ( 50 ) 200 . Fourier coefficients for ce n ( x , 10 ) , se n + 1 ( x , 10 ) , n = 0 ( 1 ) 7 . Mathieu functions ce n ( x , 10 ) , se n + 1 ( x , 10 ) , and their first x -derivatives for n = 0 ( 1 ) 4 , x = 0 ( 5 ) 90 . Modified Mathieu functions Mc n ( j ) ( x , 10 ) , Ms n + 1 ( j ) ( x , 10 ) , and their first x -derivatives for n = 0 ( 1 ) 4 , j = 1 , 2 , x = 0 ( .2 ) 4 . Precision is mostly 9S.

  • 4: Bibliography K
  • R. B. Kearfott, M. Dawande, K. Du, and C. Hu (1994) Algorithm 737: INTLIB: A portable Fortran 77 interval standard-function library. ACM Trans. Math. Software 20 (4), pp. 447–459.
  • M. K. Kerimov (1980) Methods of computing the Riemann zeta-function and some generalizations of it. USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 20 (6), pp. 212–230.
  • A. V. Kitaev and A. H. Vartanian (2004) Connection formulae for asymptotics of solutions of the degenerate third Painlevé equation. I. Inverse Problems 20 (4), pp. 1165–1206.
  • T. H. Koornwinder (2009) The Askey scheme as a four-manifold with corners. Ramanujan J. 20 (3), pp. 409–439.
  • E. D. Krupnikov and K. S. Kölbig (1997) Some special cases of the generalized hypergeometric function F q q + 1 . J. Comput. Appl. Math. 78 (1), pp. 79–95.
  • 5: 18.5 Explicit Representations
    §18.5(iii) Finite Power Series, the Hypergeometric Function, and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions
    Hermite
    For this reason, and also in the interest of simplicity, in the case of the Jacobi polynomials P n ( α , β ) ( x ) we assume throughout this chapter that α > 1 and β > 1 , unless stated otherwise. Similarly in the cases of the ultraspherical polynomials C n ( λ ) ( x ) and the Laguerre polynomials L n ( α ) ( x ) we assume that λ > 1 2 , λ 0 , and α > 1 , unless stated otherwise. …
    T 5 ( x ) = 16 x 5 20 x 3 + 5 x ,
    6: 32.8 Rational Solutions
    More generally, … In the general case assume γ δ 0 , so that as in §32.2(ii) we may set γ = 1 and δ = 1 . … In the general case assume δ 0 , so that as in §32.2(ii) we may set δ = 1 2 . …Cases (a) and (b) are special cases of §32.10(v). … In the general case, P VI  has rational solutions if …
    7: 36.4 Bifurcation Sets
    Special Cases
    x = 9 20 z 2 .
    x = 3 20 z 2 ,
    8: 5.11 Asymptotic Expansions
    Wrench (1968) gives exact values of g k up to g 20 . … In the case K = 1 the factor 1 + ζ ( K ) is replaced with 4. … In terms of generalized Bernoulli polynomials B n ( ) ( x ) 24.16(i)), we have for k = 0 , 1 , ,
    5.11.17 G k ( a , b ) = ( a b k ) B k ( a b + 1 ) ( a ) ,
    For the error term in (5.11.19) in the case z = x ( > 0 ) and c = 1 , see Olver (1995). …
    9: 20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
    §20.11 Generalizations and Analogs
    In the case z = 0 identities for theta functions become identities in the complex variable q , with | q | < 1 , that involve rational functions, power series, and continued fractions; see Adiga et al. (1985), McKean and Moll (1999, pp. 156–158), and Andrews et al. (1988, §10.7). … However, in this case q is no longer regarded as an independent complex variable within the unit circle, because k is related to the variable τ = τ ( k ) of the theta functions via (20.9.2). …
    10: Bibliography N
  • D. Naylor (1989) On an integral transform involving a class of Mathieu functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (6), pp. 1500–1513.
  • W. J. Nellis and B. C. Carlson (1966) Reduction and evaluation of elliptic integrals. Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 223–231.
  • G. Nemes (2013c) Generalization of Binet’s Gamma function formulas. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 24 (8), pp. 597–606.
  • P. Nevai (1986) Géza Freud, orthogonal polynomials and Christoffel functions. A case study. J. Approx. Theory 48 (1), pp. 3–167.
  • E. W. Ng and M. Geller (1969) A table of integrals of the error functions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect B. 73B, pp. 1–20.