About the Project

explicit forms

AdvancedHelp

(0.001 seconds)

11—20 of 23 matching pages

11: 3.8 Nonlinear Equations
Sometimes the equation takes the form
§3.8(iv) Zeros of Polynomials
Explicit formulas for the zeros are available if n 4 ; see §§1.11(iii) and 4.43. No explicit general formulas exist when n 5 . …
12: 18.35 Pollaczek Polynomials
The Pollaczek polynomials of type 3 are defined by the recurrence relation (in first form (18.2.8)) …or, equivalently in second form (18.2.10), …the recurrence relation of form (18.2.11_5) becomes … As in the coefficients of the above recurrence relations n and c only occur in the form n + c , the type 3 Pollaczek polynomials may also be called the associated type 2 Pollaczek polynomials by using the terminology of §18.30. … we have the explicit representations …
13: 18.38 Mathematical Applications
A symmetric Laurent polynomial is a function of the form …where Q 0 is a constant with explicit expression in terms of e 1 , e 2 , e 3 , e 4 and q given in Koornwinder (2007a, (2.8)). … See Koornwinder (2007a, (3.13), (4.9), (4.10)) for explicit formulas. … Exceptional OP’s (EOP’s) are those which are ‘missing’ a finite number of lower order polynomials, but yet form complete sets with respect to suitable measures. …
14: 23.9 Laurent and Other Power Series
Explicit coefficients c n in terms of c 2 and c 3 are given up to c 19 in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, p. 636). … Also, Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, (18.5.25)) supplies the first 22 terms in the reverted form of (23.9.2) as 1 / ( z ) 0 . …
15: 8.11 Asymptotic Approximations and Expansions
This reference also contains explicit formulas for b k ( λ ) in terms of Stirling numbers and for the case λ > 1 an asymptotic expansion for b k ( λ ) as k . …
8.11.12 Γ ( z , z ) z z 1 e z ( π 2 z 1 2 1 3 + 2 π 24 z 1 2 4 135 z + 2 π 576 z 3 2 + 8 2835 z 2 + ) , | ph z | 2 π δ .
This reference also contains explicit formulas for the coefficients in terms of Stirling numbers. …
16: 4.13 Lambert W -Function
4.13.3_1 W 0 ( x e x ) = { x , 1 x , (no simpler form) , x < 1 .
4.13.3_2 W ± 1 ( x e x 0 i ) = { (no simpler form) , 1 x , x , x < 1 .
Explicit representations for the p n ( x ) are given in Kalugin and Jeffrey (2011). …See Jeffrey and Murdoch (2017) for an explicit representation for the c n in terms of associated Stirling numbers. …
17: 18.34 Bessel Polynomials
Explicit (but complicated) weight functions w ( x ) taking both positive and negative values have been found such that (18.2.26) holds with d μ ( x ) = w ( x ) d x ; see Durán (1993), Evans et al. (1993), and Maroni (1995). …
18.34.8 lim α P n ( α , a α 2 ) ( 1 + α x ) P n ( α , a α 2 ) ( 1 ) = y n ( x ; a ) .
18: 2.6 Distributional Methods
This leads to integrals of the formAn important asset of the distribution method is that it gives explicit expressions for the remainder terms associated with the resulting asymptotic expansions. … The distribution method outlined here can be extended readily to functions f ( t ) having an asymptotic expansion of the formIt is easily seen that K + forms a commutative, associative linear algebra. … On inserting this identity into (2.6.54), we immediately encounter divergent integrals of the form
19: Bibliography H
  • K. Horata (1989) An explicit formula for Bernoulli numbers. Rep. Fac. Sci. Technol. Meijo Univ. 29, pp. 1–6.
  • F. T. Howard (1996a) Explicit formulas for degenerate Bernoulli numbers. Discrete Math. 162 (1-3), pp. 175–185.
  • J. H. Hubbard and B. B. Hubbard (2002) Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: A Unified Approach. 2nd edition, Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • 20: Bibliography G
  • E. T. Goodwin (1949b) The evaluation of integrals of the form f ( x ) e x 2 𝑑 x . Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45 (2), pp. 241–245.
  • H. W. Gould (1972) Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers. Amer. Math. Monthly 79, pp. 44–51.
  • C. H. Greene, U. Fano, and G. Strinati (1979) General form of the quantum-defect theory. Phys. Rev. A 19 (4), pp. 1485–1509.