explicit%20formulas
♦
4 matching pages ♦
(0.002 seconds)
4 matching pages
1: 5.11 Asymptotic Expansions
…
►Wrench (1968) gives exact values of up to .
…For explicit formulas for in terms of Stirling numbers see Nemes (2013a), and for asymptotic expansions of as see Boyd (1994) and Nemes (2015a).
►
Terminology
►The expansion (5.11.1) is called Stirling’s series (Whittaker and Watson (1927, §12.33)), whereas the expansion (5.11.3), or sometimes just its leading term, is known as Stirling’s formula (Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, §6.1), Olver (1997b, p. 88)). …2: Bibliography N
…
►
On simplified asymptotic formulas for a class of Mathieu functions.
SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15 (6), pp. 1205–1213.
…
►
On an integral transform involving a class of Mathieu functions.
SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (6), pp. 1500–1513.
…
►
Reduction and evaluation of elliptic integrals.
Math. Comp. 20 (94), pp. 223–231.
…
►
An explicit formula for the coefficients in Laplace’s method.
Constr. Approx. 38 (3), pp. 471–487.
…
►
A table of integrals of the error functions.
J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect B. 73B, pp. 1–20.
…
3: Bibliography G
…
►
Contiguous relations and summation and transformation formulae for basic hypergeometric series.
J. Difference Equ. Appl. 19 (12), pp. 2029–2042.
…
►
Construction of Gauss-Christoffel quadrature formulas.
Math. Comp. 22, pp. 251–270.
…
►
Algorithm 939: computation of the Marcum Q-function.
ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 40 (3), pp. 20:1–20:21.
…
►
Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers.
Amer. Math. Monthly 79, pp. 44–51.
…
►
Mutual integrability, quadratic algebras, and dynamical symmetry.
Ann. Phys. 217 (1), pp. 1–20.
…
4: 18.39 Applications in the Physical Sciences
…
►Here are three examples of solutions for (18.39.8) for explicit choices of and with the corresponding to the discrete spectrum.
…
►Explicit normalization is given for the second, third, and fourth of these, paragraphs c) and d), below.
…
►thus recapitulating, for , line 11 of Table 18.8.1, now shown with explicit normalization for the measure .
…
►see Bethe and Salpeter (1957, p. 13), Pauling and Wilson (1985, pp. 130, 131); and noting that this differs from the Rodrigues formula of (18.5.5) for the Laguerre OP’s, in the omission of an in the denominator.
…
►Derivations of (18.39.42) appear in Bethe and Salpeter (1957, pp. 12–20), and Pauling and Wilson (1985, Chapter V and Appendix VII), where the derivations are based on (18.39.36), and is also the notation of Piela (2014, §4.7), typifying the common use of the associated Coulomb–Laguerre polynomials in theoretical quantum chemistry.
…