About the Project
NIST

defined by contour integrals

AdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

1—10 of 14 matching pages

1: 9.14 Incomplete Airy Functions
Incomplete Airy functions are defined by the contour integral (9.5.4) when one of the integration limits is replaced by a variable real or complex parameter. …
2: 1.10 Functions of a Complex Variable
§1.10(viii) Functions Defined by Contour Integrals
3: 2.10 Sums and Sequences
The asymptotic behavior of entire functions defined by Maclaurin series can be approached by converting the sum into a contour integral by use of the residue theorem and applying the methods of §§2.4 and 2.5. …
4: 21.7 Riemann Surfaces
Then the matrix defined by …is a Riemann matrix and it is used to define the corresponding Riemann theta function. … Define the holomorphic differential …Then the prime form on the corresponding compact Riemann surface Γ is defined by … Define the operation …
5: 1.9 Calculus of a Complex Variable
§1.9(iii) Integration
If x ( t ) and y ( t ) are continuous and x ( t ) and y ( t ) are piecewise continuous, then z ( t ) defines a contour. … A simple closed contour is a simple contour, except that z ( a ) = z ( b ) . …
Winding Number
6: Errata
  • Subsection 25.2(ii) Other Infinite Series

    It is now mentioned that (25.2.5), defines the Stieltjes constants γ n . Consequently, γ n in (25.2.4), (25.6.12) are now identified as the Stieltjes constants.

  • Section 1.14

    There have been extensive changes in the notation used for the integral transforms defined in §1.14. These changes are applied throughout the DLMF. The following table summarizes the changes.

    Transform New Abbreviated Old
    Notation Notation Notation
    Fourier ( f ) ( x ) f ( x )
    Fourier Cosine c ( f ) ( x ) c f ( x )
    Fourier Sine s ( f ) ( x ) s f ( x )
    Laplace ( f ) ( s ) f ( s ) ( f ( t ) ; s )
    Mellin ( f ) ( s ) f ( s ) ( f ; s )
    Hilbert ( f ) ( s ) f ( s ) ( f ; s )
    Stieltjes 𝒮 ( f ) ( s ) 𝒮 f ( s ) 𝒮 ( f ; s )

    Previously, for the Fourier, Fourier cosine and Fourier sine transforms, either temporary local notations were used or the Fourier integrals were written out explicitly.

  • Figures 36.3.18, 36.3.19, 36.3.20, 36.3.21

    The scaling error reported on 2016-09-12 by Dan Piponi also applied to contour and density plots for the phase of the hyperbolic umbilic canonical integrals. Scales were corrected in all figures. The interval - 8.4 x - y 2 8.4 was replaced by - 12.0 x - y 2 12.0 and - 12.7 x + y 2 4.2 replaced by - 18.0 x + y 2 6.0 . All plots and interactive visualizations were regenerated to improve image quality.

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.18: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 0 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.19: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 1 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.20: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 2 ) .

    See accompanying text See accompanying text
    (a) Contour plot. (b) Density plot.

    Figure 36.3.21: Phase of hyperbolic umbilic canonical integral ph Ψ ( H ) ( x , y , 3 ) .

    Reported 2016-09-28.

  • Subsections 1.15(vi), 1.15(vii), 2.6(iii)

    A number of changes were made with regard to fractional integrals and derivatives. In §1.15(vi) a reference to Miller and Ross (1993) was added, the fractional integral operator of order α was more precisely identified as the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order α , and a paragraph was added below (1.15.50) to generalize (1.15.47). In §1.15(vii) the sentence defining the fractional derivative was clarified. In §2.6(iii) the identification of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator was made consistent with §1.15(vi).

  • Equations (22.19.6), (22.19.7), (22.19.8), (22.19.9)

    These equations were rewritten with the modulus (second argument) of the Jacobian elliptic function defined explicitly in the preceding line of text.

  • 7: 9.13 Generalized Airy Functions
    For properties of the zeros of the functions defined in this subsection see Laforgia and Muldoon (1988) and references given therein. …
    §9.13(ii) Generalizations from Integral Representations
    Reid (1972) and Drazin and Reid (1981, Appendix) introduce the following contour integrals in constructing approximate solutions to the Orr--Sommerfeld equation for fluid flow: … Further properties of these functions, and also of similar contour integrals containing an additional factor ( ln t ) q , q = 1 , 2 , , in the integrand, are derived in Reid (1972), Drazin and Reid (1981, Appendix), and Baldwin (1985). …
    8: 9.17 Methods of Computation
    A comprehensive and powerful approach is to integrate the defining differential equation (9.2.1) by direct numerical methods. …
    §9.17(iii) Integral Representations
    Among the integral representations of the Airy functions the Stieltjes transform (9.10.18) furnishes a way of computing Ai ( z ) in the complex plane, once values of this function can be generated on the positive real axis. … In the first method the integration path for the contour integral (9.5.4) is deformed to coincide with paths of steepest descent (§2.4(iv)). …The second method is to apply generalized Gauss–Laguerre quadrature (§3.5(v)) to the integral (9.5.8). …
    9: 3.3 Interpolation
    where C is a simple closed contour in D described in the positive rotational sense and enclosing the points z , z 1 , z 2 , , z n . … and A k n are the Lagrangian interpolation coefficients defined by … Let c n be defined by … where ω n + 1 ( ζ ) is given by (3.3.3), and C is a simple closed contour in D described in the positive rotational sense and enclosing z 0 , z 1 , , z n . … For interpolation of a bounded function f on the cardinal function of f is defined by …
    10: 15.9 Relations to Other Functions
    The Jacobi transform is defined as
    15.9.12 f ~ ( λ ) = 0 f ( t ) ϕ λ ( α , β ) ( t ) ( 2 sinh t ) 2 α + 1 ( 2 cosh t ) 2 β + 1 d t ,
    15.9.13 f ( t ) = 1 2 π i - i i f ~ ( i λ ) Φ i λ ( α , β ) ( t ) Γ ( 1 2 ( α + β + 1 + λ ) ) Γ ( 1 2 ( α - β + 1 + λ ) ) Γ ( α + 1 ) Γ ( λ ) 2 α + β + 1 - λ d λ ,
    where the contour of integration is located to the right of the poles of the gamma functions in the integrand, and … It is defined by: …