About the Project

comparison%20with%20Clenshaw%E2%80%93Curtis%20formula

AdvancedHelp

(0.003 seconds)

1—10 of 331 matching pages

1: 20 Theta Functions
Chapter 20 Theta Functions
2: 18.40 Methods of Computation
For applications in which the OP’s appear only as terms in series expansions (compare §18.18(i)) the need to compute them can be avoided altogether by use instead of Clenshaw’s algorithm (§3.11(ii)) and its straightforward generalization to OP’s other than Chebyshev. For further information see Clenshaw (1955), Gautschi (2004, §§2.1, 8.1), and Mason and Handscomb (2003, §2.4). … Results of low ( 2 to 3 decimal digits) precision for w ( x ) are easily obtained for N 10 to 20 . … Comparisons of the precisions of Lagrange and PWCF interpolations to obtain the derivatives, are shown in Figure 18.40.2. …
3: 8 Incomplete Gamma and Related
Functions
4: 28 Mathieu Functions and Hill’s Equation
5: 8.26 Tables
  • Khamis (1965) tabulates P ( a , x ) for a = 0.05 ( .05 ) 10 ( .1 ) 20 ( .25 ) 70 , 0.0001 x 250 to 10D.

  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, pp. 245–248) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 to 7D; also ( x + n ) e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x 1 = 0 ( .01 ) 0.1 ( .05 ) 0.5 to 6S.

  • Pagurova (1961) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 ( .1 ) 10 to 4-9S; e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 ( 1 ) 10 , x = 10 ( .1 ) 20 to 7D; e x E p ( x ) for p = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 7 ( .05 ) 12 ( .1 ) 20 to 7S or 7D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, Table 19.1) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 15 , 20 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , 1.5 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 50 , 100 to 7D or 8S.

  • 6: 23 Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular
    Functions
    7: Bibliography R
  • A. Ralston (1965) Rational Chebyshev approximation by Remes’ algorithms. Numer. Math. 7 (4), pp. 322–330.
  • J. Raynal (1979) On the definition and properties of generalized 6 - j  symbols. J. Math. Phys. 20 (12), pp. 2398–2415.
  • I. S. Reed, D. W. Tufts, X. Yu, T. K. Truong, M. T. Shih, and X. Yin (1990) Fourier analysis and signal processing by use of the Möbius inversion formula. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing 38, pp. 458–470.
  • K. Reinsch and W. Raab (2000) Elliptic Integrals of the First and Second Kind – Comparison of Bulirsch’s and Carlson’s Algorithms for Numerical Calculation. In Special Functions (Hong Kong, 1999), C. Dunkl, M. Ismail, and R. Wong (Eds.), pp. 293–308.
  • H. Rosengren (1999) Another proof of the triple sum formula for Wigner 9 j -symbols. J. Math. Phys. 40 (12), pp. 6689–6691.
  • 8: 33.24 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, Chapter 14) tabulates F 0 ( η , ρ ) , G 0 ( η , ρ ) , F 0 ( η , ρ ) , and G 0 ( η , ρ ) for η = 0.5 ( .5 ) 20 and ρ = 1 ( 1 ) 20 , 5S; C 0 ( η ) for η = 0 ( .05 ) 3 , 6S.

  • Curtis (1964a) tabulates P ( ϵ , r ) , Q ( ϵ , r ) 33.1), and related functions for = 0 , 1 , 2 and ϵ = 2 ( .2 ) 2 , with x = 0 ( .1 ) 4 for ϵ < 0 and x = 0 ( .1 ) 10 for ϵ 0 ; 6D.

  • 9: Gergő Nemes
    As of September 20, 2021, Nemes performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 25 Zeta and Related Functions. …
    10: Wolter Groenevelt
    As of September 20, 2022, Groenevelt performed a complete analysis and acted as main consultant for the update of the source citation and proof metadata for every formula in Chapter 18 Orthogonal Polynomials. …