Weierstrass M-test

SearchAdvancedHelp

(0.002 seconds)

31—36 of 36 matching pages

31: Errata

… ►

This subsection has been significantly updated. In particular, the following formulae have been corrected. Equation (19.25.35) has been replaced by

19.25.35 $$z+2\omega =\pm R_F(\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_1,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_2,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_3),$$

in which the left-hand side $z$ has been replaced by $z+2\omega$ for some $2\omega \in 𝕃$, and the right-hand side has been multiplied by $\pm 1$. Equation (19.25.37) has been replaced by

19.25.37 $$\zeta \left(z+2\omega \right)+(z+2\omega )\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)=\pm 2R_G(\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_1,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_2,\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)-e_3),$$

in which the left-hand side $\zeta \left(z\right)+z\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$ has been replaced by $\zeta \left(z+2\omega \right)+(z+2\omega )\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)$ and the right-hand side has been multiplied by $\pm 1$. Equation (19.25.39) has been replaced by

19.25.39 $$\zeta \left({\omega }_j\right)+{\omega }_j{e}_j=2R_G(0,e_j-e_k,e_j-e_{\mathrm{\ell }}),$$

in which the left-hand side ${\eta }_j$ was replaced by $\zeta \left({\omega }_j\right)$, for some $2{\omega }_j\in 𝕃$ and $\mathrm{\wp }\left({\omega }_j\right)=e_j$. Equation (19.25.40) has been replaced by

19.25.40 $$z+2\omega =\pm \sigma \left(z\right)R_F({\sigma }_1^2(z),{\sigma }_2^2(z),{\sigma }_3^2(z)),$$

in which the left-hand side $z$ has been replaced by $z+2\omega$, and the right-hand side was multiplied by $\pm 1$. For more details see §19.25(vi).

… ►

23.12.2 $$\zeta \left(z\right)=\frac{{\pi }^2}{4{\omega }_1^2}\left(\frac{z}{3}+\frac{2{\omega }_1}{\pi }\cot \left(\frac{\pi z}{2{\omega }_1}\right)-8\left(z-\frac{{\omega }_1}{\pi }\sin \left(\frac{\pi z}{{\omega }_1}\right)\right)q^2+O\left(q^4\right)\right)$$

Originally, the factor of 2 was missing from the denominator of the argument of the $\cot$ function.

Reported by Blagoje Oblak on 2019-05-27

… ►

The Weierstrass lattice roots $e_j,$ were linked inadvertently as the base of the natural logarithm. In order to resolve this inconsistency, the lattice roots $e_j$, and lattice invariants $g_2$, $g_3$, now link to their respective definitions (see §§23.2(i), 23.3(i)).

Reported by Felix Ospald.

►

The Weierstrass zeta function was incorrectly linked to the definition of the Riemann zeta function. However, to the eye, the function appeared correct. The link was corrected.

… ►

23.2.4 $$\mathrm{\wp }\left(z\right)=\frac{1}{z^2}+\sum _{w\in 𝕃\setminus \{0\}}\left(\frac{1}{{(z-w)}^2}-\frac{1}{w^2}\right)$$

Originally the denominator ${(z-w)}^2$ was given incorrectly as $(z-w^2)$.

Reported 2012-02-16 by James D. Walker.

…

32: 32.13 Reductions of Partial Differential Equations

… ►Depending whether $A=0$ or $A\ne 0$, $v(z)$ is expressible in terms of the Weierstrass elliptic function (§23.2) or solutions of ${\text{P}}_{\text{I}}$, respectively. …

33: 1.10 Functions of a Complex Variable

… ►

$M$-test

… ►

Weierstrass Product

…

34: 20.11 Generalizations and Analogs

… ►As in §20.11(ii), the modulus $k$ of elliptic integrals (§19.2(ii)), Jacobian elliptic functions (§22.2), and Weierstrass elliptic functions (§23.6(ii)) can be expanded in $q$-series via (20.9.1). …

35: Software Index

… ► ►►►

	Open Source													With Book						Commercial
…
23 Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular Functions
…

…

36: 1.9 Calculus of a Complex Variable

… ►

Weierstrass $M$-test

…