About the Project

%E7%AB%9E%E5%BD%A9%E8%B6%B3%E7%90%83%E8%BF%87%E5%85%B3%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F3%C3%971%E3%80%90%E4%BA%9A%E5%8D%9A%E5%AE%98%E6%96%B9qee9.com%E3%80%91%E7%94%B5%E8%84%91%E6%AC%A2%E4%B9%90%E6%96%97%E5%9C%B0%E4%B8%BB%E5%9C%A8%E5%93%AA%E9%87%8CNuq7IN

AdvancedHelp

Did you mean %E7%AB%9E%E5%BD%A9%E8%B6%B3%E7%90%83%E8%BF%87%E5%85%B3%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F3%C3%971%E3%80%90%E4%BA%9A%E5%8D%9A%E5%AE%98%E6%96%welcom%E3%80%91%E7%94%B5%E8%84%91%E6%AC%A2%E4%B9%90%E6%96%97%E5%9C%B0%E4%B8%BB%E5%9C%A8%E5%93%AA%E9%87%8CNuq7IN ?

(0.033 seconds)

1—10 of 552 matching pages

1: 34.6 Definition: 9 j Symbol
§34.6 Definition: 9 j Symbol
The 9 j symbol may be defined either in terms of 3 j symbols or equivalently in terms of 6 j symbols:
34.6.1 { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = all  m r s ( j 11 j 12 j 13 m 11 m 12 m 13 ) ( j 21 j 22 j 23 m 21 m 22 m 23 ) ( j 31 j 32 j 33 m 31 m 32 m 33 ) ( j 11 j 21 j 31 m 11 m 21 m 31 ) ( j 12 j 22 j 32 m 12 m 22 m 32 ) ( j 13 j 23 j 33 m 13 m 23 m 33 ) ,
34.6.2 { j 11 j 12 j 13 j 21 j 22 j 23 j 31 j 32 j 33 } = j ( 1 ) 2 j ( 2 j + 1 ) { j 11 j 21 j 31 j 32 j 33 j } { j 12 j 22 j 32 j 21 j j 23 } { j 13 j 23 j 33 j j 11 j 12 } .
The 9 j symbol may also be written as a finite triple sum equivalent to a terminating generalized hypergeometric series of three variables with unit arguments. …
2: 34.12 Physical Applications
§34.12 Physical Applications
The angular momentum coupling coefficients ( 3 j , 6 j , and 9 j symbols) are essential in the fields of nuclear, atomic, and molecular physics. … 3 j , 6 j , and 9 j symbols are also found in multipole expansions of solutions of the Laplace and Helmholtz equations; see Carlson and Rushbrooke (1950) and Judd (1976).
3: 9 Airy and Related Functions
Chapter 9 Airy and Related Functions
4: Bibliography C
  • R. G. Campos (1995) A quadrature formula for the Hankel transform. Numer. Algorithms 9 (2), pp. 343–354.
  • B. C. Carlson (1978) Short proofs of three theorems on elliptic integrals. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (3), pp. 524–528.
  • T. S. Chihara and M. E. H. Ismail (1993) Extremal measures for a system of orthogonal polynomials. Constr. Approx. 9, pp. 111–119.
  • J. S. Christiansen and M. E. H. Ismail (2006) A moment problem and a family of integral evaluations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (9), pp. 4071–4097.
  • P. A. Clarkson (1991) Nonclassical Symmetry Reductions and Exact Solutions for Physically Significant Nonlinear Evolution Equations. In Nonlinear and Chaotic Phenomena in Plasmas, Solids and Fluids (Edmonton, AB, 1990), W. Rozmus and J. A. Tuszynski (Eds.), pp. 72–79.
  • 5: 24.2 Definitions and Generating Functions
    E 2 n + 1 = 0 ,
    24.2.9 E n = 2 n E n ( 1 2 ) = integer ,
    E ~ n ( x ) = E n ( x ) , 0 x < 1 ,
    E ~ n ( x + 1 ) = E ~ n ( x ) , x .
    Table 24.2.4: Euler numbers E n .
    n E n
    6: 8.26 Tables
  • Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, pp. 245–248) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 to 7D; also ( x + n ) e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 20 , x 1 = 0 ( .01 ) 0.1 ( .05 ) 0.5 to 6S.

  • Chiccoli et al. (1988) presents a short table of E p ( x ) for p = 9 2 ( 1 ) 1 2 , 0 x 200 to 14S.

  • Pagurova (1961) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 0 ( 1 ) 20 , x = 0 ( .01 ) 2 ( .1 ) 10 to 4-9S; e x E n ( x ) for n = 2 ( 1 ) 10 , x = 10 ( .1 ) 20 to 7D; e x E p ( x ) for p = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 7 ( .05 ) 12 ( .1 ) 20 to 7S or 7D.

  • Stankiewicz (1968) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 1 ( 1 ) 10 , x = 0.01 ( .01 ) 5 to 7D.

  • Zhang and Jin (1996, Table 19.1) tabulates E n ( x ) for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 15 , 20 , x = 0 ( .1 ) 1 , 1.5 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 20 , 30 , 50 , 100 to 7D or 8S.

  • 7: 34 3j, 6j, 9j Symbols
    Chapter 34 3 j , 6 j , 9 j Symbols
    8: 34.14 Tables
    §34.14 Tables
    Tables of exact values of the squares of the 3 j and 6 j symbols in which all parameters are 8 are given in Rotenberg et al. (1959), together with a bibliography of earlier tables of 3 j , 6 j , and 9 j symbols on pp. … Some selected 9 j symbols are also given. … 16-17; for 9 j symbols on p. …  310–332, and for the 9 j symbols on pp. …
    9: 19.36 Methods of Computation
    where the elementary symmetric functions E s are defined by (19.19.4). … Accurate values of F ( ϕ , k ) E ( ϕ , k ) for k 2 near 0 can be obtained from R D by (19.2.6) and (19.25.13). … E ( ϕ , k ) can be evaluated by using (19.25.7), and R D by using (19.21.10), but cancellations may become significant. Thompson (1997, pp. 499, 504) uses descending Landen transformations for both F ( ϕ , k ) and E ( ϕ , k ) . … Lee (1990) compares the use of theta functions for computation of K ( k ) , E ( k ) , and K ( k ) E ( k ) , 0 k 2 1 , with four other methods. …
    10: 16.26 Approximations
    For discussions of the approximation of generalized hypergeometric functions and the Meijer G -function in terms of polynomials, rational functions, and Chebyshev polynomials see Luke (1975, §§5.12 - 5.13) and Luke (1977b, Chapters 1 and 9).